Topic: bittit - Sell your pictures for Bitcoins - page 5. (Read 14621 times)

BCP i'm thinking that's a false positive AVAST isn't reporting anything from it neither is AVG

Microsoft Security Essentials caught it right away, was just checking out your other sites in your signature.


Was found in \Documents and Settings\xxx\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Cache\   I am guessing it was something through adfly, but I didn't check what other networks were on the page before just closing out.

Love the site great concept i cant seem to upload an image tho. I think it just chucks me off half way through. maybe you can add a uplaod bar so we can see progress as im not sure whats going on exactly.

Thanks

Well I thought that the javascript popup when you first enter was enough to warn you about that. :-)


Oh and I did some major changes to the site. NSFW is seperated now and only original content can be uploaded.

And I don't see anything in my blog. I scanned it with virustotal and it comes up clean. How did you get that warning BitcoinPorn?

PS: Also to upload NSFW pictures you have to verify yourself with a procedure similar to /r/gonewild. Sorry for the fuss...

I have no idea, there is no threads advertising his blog in his signature, so I won't make a thread or anything about it, just at least want to let him know and I guess anyone reading this particular thread.  I'm sure it is just through one of the many ad networks running off the blog.

Should we publicly announce this? How serious is this malicious ware?

Also, you seem to have a virus through your blog site in your signature.

Exploit:JS/Blacole.A

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBaum's_World#Copyright_infringement

Having the ability to have an end user be able to flag content is a way to cover your ass somewhat I believe, I do not know the specifics.     I think there is some cool ideas that could come from how the site is set up, but I just worry about stolen image abuse, it seems really easy.

I wish you luck, I honestly do, but I just hope more steps are taken to make sure people who create visual content on the internet will not have to worry about profits being taken from them.

Good idea. You can do it if I add the ability to have a different comment for fully paid pictures: Stitch the three together, upload them and then put a link to the zipfile in the comment. Not the best way though and it also misses the point of raising the resolution of individual pictures. I would prefer to upload a zipfile and then have the site to show as many forms as the pictures to set a price/address/comment for each one of them. What'd you think?

We accept hairy tits. :-P


Fixed. WTF was I thinking.


I am trying as hard as I can to avoid illegal photos. Although I am not sure if checking them myself puts me in a better legal position than having them autoaccepted and just allowing users to flag them. Bad thing is that there are no accounts (and I'd like to keep it that way) so I can't really ban users, so someone could troll the site while now he can only troll me.

That can be done and I can implement a tag system too. Might take a few days though cause I lack the time right now.
Nobody pays to view the picture. Users pay to increase the resolution of the picture but the picture is available to all. There is no point doing this on a per user basis since a user could grab the high res and give it to everyone.
Again the price is not paid per user. Whenever someone pays a portion of the final price, the picture grows towards its max res and it's available to eveyone. The closest thing I can think of is to report pictures with bad tags so that they are fixed/removed.


What happened to ebaums? If you are worried about image regulation I can do it myself along with a friend for now and I preffer to keep it instead of allowing flagging of content. Unless someone has better (legal) advice. BTW I don't know if that is what you mean but we don't take any cut from the picture sales. The bitcoins get sent directly to the sellers wallet and we just monitor the transactions to raise the resolution as appropriate.


So should I put it in the wiki somewhere?

You got it all wrong.  The people who pay for porn are not at all the same people who know where to get it for free.   Two completely separate audiences.



Anyways, just seen this link in /r/Bitcion, still having the same thought, how would this not go the way of eBaumsworld?   Except the users are taking a cut along with eBaum.  Which is funny as I know Bitcoin sort of brings that 'no rules' feel to the internet much like eBaum tried to claim as his defense in the first place.  I just fear the first person ballsy enough to try and put something created by a SomethingAwful Goon on the site to see how that goes down.

Anyways, I still like the Bittit concept and think as long as it is on top of image regulation, it could be awesome.

One way to solve the hairy tit problem might be to:

- in addition to age verification, ask for sexual orientation

- users who view new photos get to rate them and newly posted/unrated pics are cheap to view

- higher rated pics by users of the same sexual orientation cost a bit more for later users to view

So, in the hairy tits scenario, gay/bi/bear lovers would rate higher than I would as a straight male. Other straight males would see the low res hairy tits as cheap to view. Gay/bi/bear lovers would see the low rez hairy tits as a bit more expensive to view.

Sheesh...bitcoin...is there any problem it cant solve?

then we'll all just flag the ones that someone else is selling though! really just kidding flagging should only mark it for moderation and an email alert nothing more

Or just upload them and let users flag inappropriate pictures.

Your photo has been uploaded successfully and it will be approved in the next few days.


^ that is way too long these days hours should be more like it at worst

"Hotest" is misspelled.

  HAHA, the low rez version would not show the hair so the buyer might have his/her 'mood' interupted when they receive it. ;p

Is it a problem if the tits are super hairy?

I like it, but i want to be able to include photo sets(25-50 pics in a zip with 2-3 in low res as a display)

I just made this site with a friend. You can upload an original picture and set a price for it. Then the picture will be shown at the front page of the site in a low resolution and users will have to pay to increase the resolution. It seemed like a nice sale model to me so here it is: bittit.info.

BTW I hesitate to add this to the wiki because I don't know which section it falls under. I realize that the best users for a site like this would be the people over /r/gonewild and I intend to allow such usage (that's why I ask for age confirmation to first-time visitors). If someone could tell me which is the proper place for it I'd be happy. :-)