You can think that but intelligence is genetic. Virtually every scientific breakthrough has been from whites.
This is blatantly false. Where the hell are you getting this information from? China's nearly outpacing America on scientific discovery.
If you truly believe what you say is fact, you're naive.
Race doesn't really play a part in it, as you can see in that chart with math scores, all races can score lowly, all races can score highly.
Asians are very close to whites, but the difference from blacks is drastic.
Holy shit, you're just a straight up racist.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiensWe're all human regardless of the amount of melatonin in our skin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGAqYNFQdZ4So its just a coincidence that all the athletes in the 100m olympic sprint are all black?
Whites and blacks evolved differently, whites had to innovate in order to survive in the harsh climate up north. blacks were living in a tropical climate so their brains didn't have to evolve.
I recommend you read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence before continuing anymore in this thread. You probably won't considering how quickly you replied to my post regarding the homo sapien and Don't be a sucker link.
If you believe genetics defines intelligence by itself, should totally check out genetics of race and intelligence.
Why in the world would I trust wikipedia? They have an agenda to push, wikipedia is filled with lies.
You're mentally challenged. Wikipedia lists its sources at the bottom of the goddamned page.
Wikipedia also isn't a centralized or bias entity. It literally exists to spread information that is sourced. But if you don't
trust research, you can fuck right off from using a computer.
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1177/0095798401027002004This article presents a synthesis of arguments disputing the existence of racialethnic
differences in mental ability, and it challenges the classicist model of “intelligence”
on which hereditarian assumptions of racial disparity are based. A
review of the literature reveals the following eight major premises held by supporters
of this perspective: (a) intelligence is unidimensional and can be represented
by a single factor, g; (b) intelligence is fixed within individuals and across
generations; (c) IQ tests accurately measure this fixed ability; (d) IQ tests are
equally valid across racial, ethnic, and cultural groups; (e) intelligence determines
individuals’ professional and social standings; (f) environment plays little
role in determining an individual’s intelligence; (g) the intelligence of populations
is deteriorating over time; and (h) scores on IQ tests are consistent with
classical statistical and measurement theory. Each premise is refuted on the basis
of historical, sociological, psychological, and statistical evidence