Topic: Blockchain 3.0 - page 2. (Read 721 times)

Well i don't know if I can offer all them things but I think I have a revolutionary new concept that
I want to test out that uses Distributed Network Architecture (DNA) that will scale to spread the loads
across multiple servers (Not miners, not using any) that separates the network from the coins so it becomes
a bean counter as such much like ETH "smart contracts" offers to alt-coins so these coins become native to the network.

Wallets will need just one interface to hold various coin denominations but unlike Bitcoin that is real slim in terms of data size
per transaction at about 250 bytes this coin network will require double that amount per transaction and use "Gas" to pay for
hosting transaction server and will require a variable conversion rate between the currency and the price of "gas"

One node fits all (Like Bitcoin) is not going to work here and the coins network will require
1. Replicated DSN type address serves to host the backbone block-chain (approx size estimated)
2. Archive server that become redundant but added for safety and security
3. Transaction servers (Nodes groups providing redundancy)

I intend on skinning this project out myself and then reeving it up on a LAN to test it with 1-2 billion transaction and I have
been careful not to give too much away but I believe some middle ground between VISA and Bitcoin exists and maybe I have
the answer.

@doomad : ok thanks for the advice

anyone can share more link about blockchain 3.0  I am newbie and want to read and learn it

It sounds like people are getting confused (intentionally or unintentionally) about the concept of the blockchain and cryptocurrency implementation technology.

Perhaps a different naming could be cryptocurrency 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, etc...
But even that would be incorrect because higher revision number indicates the older version is being abandoned to support the new revision.

In the case of blockchain and cryptocurrency, the original version Bitcoin has been incrementally improving from 1.0 but still a dominant force and has not abandoned its base technology.

The market reporters using these revision numbers should really learn about the technology before throwing these terminology.

Any project calling themselves "Blockchain 3.0" is immediately deducted credibility points.  A substantive description of what your coin actually does and the technology it utilises in the process is infinitely preferable to stupid marketing buzzwords and gimmicks that tell people absolutely nothing.  I could come up with any random idea and call it blockchain 3.0 or even 4.0.  It doesn't mean anything because so many idiots are using the same phrase for all sorts of different crapcoins because they want people to have the (usually completely misguided) impression that these coins are going to be the "next big thing".

It's just bullshit marketing jargon.  Please don't encourage it.

Here is a nice article to read ->>> Blockchain 3.0 To Be More Developer Friendly - https://xtrabytes.today/additional-features/blockchain-3-0-developer-friendly/

Who will be named Blockchain 3.0. Direct Acyclic Graph or DAG may be it.
DAG is a directed graph data structure that uses a topological ordering. The sequence can only go from earlier to later.
DAG is often applied to problems related to data processing, scheduling, finding the best route in navigation, and data compression.

Hi ,

I hear on several websites about the blockchain 3.0, do you know what is the difference witht the previous blockchains ?

What will be the impact on crypto using anterior version of blockchain 3.0 ?

What are the crypto using blockchain 3.0 (they maybe are the future ..  )

A lot of question, i know but thanks for your help !