Topic: Blockchain bug *urgent* (Read 1498 times)
Why lock the thread? this isn't something small but needs more discussion and some experts should comment on this issue, how can it be addresses changing? what is advanced view in blockchain? I know segwit isn't activated yet I'm not stupid but I know segwit is about using multisig addresses and transactions I wanted to know if this could be very well some kind of exploit?
I encountered this issue also just yesterday when I sent btc to pay someone using his/her coins.ph wallet address I doubled and triple check his wallet address and its the same but in the transaction ID its different I doubled check the transaction ID from my myceluim app and the one I sent to him via PM and the address are totally different just what OP's issue(different address because all coins.ph wallet address starts with 3 but on the network it starts with 1) And I observed also on the blockchain ledger that the address I used to send to my coins.ph is different to my coins.ph account but I just let it for couple of minutes without posting here or sending support ticket to coins.ph then it just fixed suddenly so theres no need to worry.
Got a reply from coins.ph , my wallet alread synced and got the btc. So it is not blockchain afterall. Thanks to everyone here
I'm just glad to see that OP's problem was solved. Kindly lock the thread. Got a reply from coins.ph , my wallet account already synced and got shows the btc. So it is not blockchain afterall. Thanks to everyone here
You should not call it a wallet when it is not a wallet. It is an account. There is a huge difference. If your Bitcoins are in a wallet then you own and control them. If your Bitcoins are in an account then you have lent your Bitcoins to them. They own and control the Bitcoins - you do not.
Got a reply from coins.ph , my wallet alread synced and got the btc. So it is not blockchain afterall. Thanks to everyone here
I just have to ask op if he sent this to his btc or peso wallet. It might just Be he is looking at the wrong wallet. If not, this is a coins.ph issue. He just have to wait for the support but may take hours before they even reply to a report.
https://blockchain.info/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95?show_adv=false
click "show scripts & coinbase" link to toggle
I see. I never use the "Hide scripts & coinbase" option so I have never seen this.click "show scripts & coinbase" link to toggle
I checked a few other multisig transactions and it turns out that with the "Hide scripts & coinbase" I always got incorrect information and with the "Show scripts & coinbase" I always got correct information.
Since, in this case, both 38fDdi6VRdLBj78iFgJTSgautnPqkyYZd2 and 17yCiAc3sj1odwSH8ads24DykG789xDWJy show the same hash (4c71d2c874e3125bf26ad92ee8433307c59588fe) I expect it is just a bug in the display calculation routine when in the "Hide scripts & coinbase" mode. Probably worth reporting to blockchain.info
If it is not blockchain, then its coins.ph problem. They have a very poor support.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
https://blockchain.info/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95?show_adv=false
click "show scripts & coinbase" link to toggle
click "show scripts & coinbase" link to toggle
OK, now that is strange. When I look it up on blockchain it shows the correct information. Do you get the correct or incorrect information when you click the link in my previous post?
Please post the link that gave you that incorrect information.
Please post the link that gave you that incorrect information.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Burt if you look this up on blockchain.info it shows a different output, you have to click 'show scripts and coinbase' to see the multisig output.
I think its a blockchain.info bug. Other explorer are showing correct address.
I do not understand what you mean. All three:https://blockexplorer.com/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95
and
https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95/
and
https://blockchain.info/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95
Show exactly the same transaction with exactly the same results:
Input to the transaction was:
14TxaUPJkSqSotXW2GdBt45mq8P3H24T4i (0.063248 BTC)
Outputs of the transaction were:
38fDdi6VRdLBj78iFgJTSgautnPqkyYZd2 - (Spent) 0.0526 BTC
1GrE3mohvRHbUWXuoChMdoAoHuBZuARrHu - (Unspent) 0.01034253 BTC
Again, both block chain browsers are showing exactly the same transaction. Why do you think they are different?
Exactly, have no clue, but do you? seems to me you're as clueless as everyone else here, could you tell me how does someone sending bitcoins to an address starting with 3 funds ends up in an address that starts with 1?
Yes, I do know what I am talking about here. What the hell are you talking about? This is not even a tricky transaction.
All that happened is that 0.063248 BTC was sent from 14TxaUPJkSqSotXW2GdBt45mq8P3H24T4i, 0.0526 BTC of it went to 38fDdi6VRdLBj78iFgJTSgautnPqkyYZd2 (which was later spent) and the change of 0.01034253 BTC was sent to, and is still sitting unspent at, 1GrE3mohvRHbUWXuoChMdoAoHuBZuARrHu
This is just a normal run of the mill everyday transaction. I have no idea what you are running on about especially since SegWit has not been turned on and may never be turned on.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
I think its a blockchain.info bug. Other explorer are showing correct address.
Blockchain also shows correct info... they are not different. Issue is the coins were
spent in another transaction with a lot of other multisig address inputs... so you need to show this to coins.ph
I think its a blockchain.info bug. Other explorer are showing correct address.
This is a very simplistic opinion on your issue, coming from my perspective, but the thing is you're using an online wallet and that wallet technically owns the keys. If they replace your address every time you receive something to it (like blockchain), they still list you as "owning" that Bitcoin, but it can get transferred out because of the different key.
As for why they aren't displaying you as owning it, that's up to the provider. No idea why. Contact the wallet and ask them.
As for why they aren't displaying you as owning it, that's up to the provider. No idea why. Contact the wallet and ask them.
why .05260000 ?
This is a very simplistic opinion on your issue, coming from my perspective, but the thing is you're using an online wallet and that wallet technically owns the keys. If they replace your address every time you receive something to it (like blockchain), they still list you as "owning" that Bitcoin, but it can get transferred out because of the different key.
As for why they aren't displaying you as owning it, that's up to the provider. No idea why. Contact the wallet and ask them.
As for why they aren't displaying you as owning it, that's up to the provider. No idea why. Contact the wallet and ask them.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
As it appears this might be an attempt to exploit segwit since multisig addresses are used in sw, I don't know but this may very well be some sorts of attack or propaganda against sw by BU lovers?
You have no idea what you are talking about do you.the address showing a 1 never got any funds..i assume that is some kind of default but the transaction is a P2SH.
SW isn't activated yet which is why your theory didn't make any sense.
As it appears this might be an attempt to exploit segwit since multisig addresses are used in sw, I don't know but this may very well be some sorts of attack or propaganda against sw by BU lovers?
You have no idea what you are talking about do you.legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
go here: https://blockchain.info/tx/51dc4bd0a0ea087cbae7840e28e08008d2da4053c7dd12f0d3362042eac45d95
click "show scripts and coinbase" you will see the outputs change...
I am not an expert on this but i know the address starting with 3 is multisig address,
so it is like the script of the multisig output then set to another one or something.
maybe someone who knows more can elaborate on whats going on
I expect all of this BTC movement you are seeing is inside the coins.ph system. His "wallet" is just a database entry - totally independent of these addresses. I could be wrong but that is what it looks like: he has a coins.ph account not a Bitcoin wallet.click "show scripts and coinbase" you will see the outputs change...
I am not an expert on this but i know the address starting with 3 is multisig address,
so it is like the script of the multisig output then set to another one or something.
maybe someone who knows more can elaborate on whats going on
probably..since the output was spent with a bunch of other multisig addresses. OP, you should ask coins.ph
As it appears this might be an attempt to exploit segwit since multisig addresses are used in sw, I don't know but this may very well be some sorts of attack or propaganda against sw by BU lovers?
You have no idea what you are talking about do you. Jump to: