You forgot to include playbetr and freebitco.in in your list. Either is great because they don't ask for KYC. Freebitco.in has also no gambling license or whatsoever which is a plus imo. Some people won't agree with this probably but I think more regulation brings more problems to this space so I think less regulation is better. Why would any casino need a gambling license anyway unless they deal with FIAT and crypto casinos shouln't deal with FIAT so regulation/KYC/gambling license is a no no for me.
I actually agree with what you are saying, the less regulation there is, the less burden we place on the anonymity of gamblers. Only 1 thing that is the yardstick is the gambler's trust which strengthens the casino. And regarding Fiat and regulations that must have a clear license the government can at least retrieve data whenever it is needed and when this happens in crypto casinos it will not be very relevant. Isn't that how crypto casinos should be? maintain the identity of the gambler but by providing a good reputation. Unfortunately, these casinos will be increasingly rare in the future.
This is the ideal, in fact, if things were like this, there would be no type of regulations and prohibitions of countries to enter casinos, in addition to this, as there are also casinos that due to their license do not allow some players of certain nationalities to not be able to playing I do not agree, for me it is in favor of the policies that governments or third parties have always sought, if a casino does not ask for KYC, it is because it knows very well what it was created for, as well as accepting VPN, because I believe that what matters is that you can play and put money, I think that's where everything is based, and other things like withdrawals, because if you want them to apply special policies, just to avoid money laundering.
if does 1xbit will definitely wins here 
