Most people who got there btc from legit transactions wouldn't need any mixing service.
If I really want to "mix" my coins, I will probably just send them to a dice site and withdraw.
Topic: Blockchain.com Shared send feature gone????? - page 2. (Read 5147 times)
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service?
If everyone uses this, eventually all coins end up being "tainted".
Wow. That is awesome.
Damn straight! If Matthew N. Wright was still around, he would update the following image:
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]
I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.
Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?
A few of my family members have invested in bitcoin. Nearly all of our address share taint (I've checked!). I don't see why my sister can't cash out her coins independently of my grandmother. So what if they share taint?
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]
I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.
Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?
A few of my family members have invested in bitcoin. Nearly all of our address share taint (I've checked!). I don't see why my sister can't cash out her coins independently of my grandmother. So what if they share taint?
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]
I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.
Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?
Thanks for sharing this!
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]
I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.
Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?
I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service?
Wow. That is awesome.
Anyone know why?
Jump to: