Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics - page 64.

JonSnow

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: willphase on April 03, 2013, 06:33:39 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Do you happen to know what happens when btc is sent to an expired "Shared Send" address? My bitcoin supplier sent a large amount without confirming the btc address with me, and ended up sending it to an expired "Shared Send" address of mine ... so now he's threatening my life and I'd really like to hear from Ben/piuk about that. lol. Annnnnddddddd stress level 1000000!

Piuk reads this thread so this is probably the best way to get in contact with him. Are the transactions confirmed on the expired address - or are they not confirming? If the latter, I would just wait for them to confirm, I've recently had some tx that take a day to confirm, even with a fee... the network is just very overloaded at the moment.

Will

The transaction that was sent to one of my "Shared Send" expired addresses now has over 100 confirmations. It's for $20k. Sad

The other unconfirmed transactions I would wait for, but they are transactions sent out to clients who bought the btc from us, and who are now also joining in on being pissed.

willphase

hero member

Activity: 767

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Do you happen to know what happens when btc is sent to an expired "Shared Send" address? My bitcoin supplier sent a large amount without confirming the btc address with me, and ended up sending it to an expired "Shared Send" address of mine ... so now he's threatening my life and I'd really like to hear from Ben/piuk about that. lol. Annnnnddddddd stress level 1000000!

Piuk reads this thread so this is probably the best way to get in contact with him. Are the transactions confirmed on the expired address - or are they not confirming? If the latter, I would just wait for them to confirm, I've recently had some tx that take a day to confirm, even with a fee... the network is just very overloaded at the moment.

Will

jamesg

vip

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

AKA: gigavps

Quote from: JonSnow on April 03, 2013, 05:58:05 PM

Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.

The transaction will eventually go through. If you would like to speed it up, Luke-jr, the owner of the eligius.st mining pool has a way to prioritize a specific transaction.

You can PM him on the forums and ask for his help.

As for blockchain.info not including a fee, I'm sure Ben will look into it and get it resolved.

JonSnow

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

It is blockchain specific - it involves my blockchain wallet and a transaction someone mistakenly sent to one of the "one time use only" Shared Send addresses associated with our account.

mcris444

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Quote from: JonSnow on April 03, 2013, 05:58:05 PM

Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.

The questions you are asking is not blockchain.info specific, but bitcoin protocol specific. So he is not the only one who can answer your questions.

JonSnow

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.

JonSnow

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Apparently in spite of having our wallet set to include the highest fee possible, the two "unconfirmed" transactions were broadcast without any fee whatsoever.

TheButterZone

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1032

RIP Mommy

Boycott:
blockchain.info for everything but informational purposes
mtgox.com for getting intermittently DDOSd in order to tank the price, most recently ~$34 in about 12 hours

deadweasel

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: giantdragon on April 03, 2013, 03:37:22 PM

Quote from: picobit on April 03, 2013, 12:48:34 PM

In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm.

small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days.

why is it happening now?

deadweasel

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: 2weiX on April 03, 2013, 04:13:37 PM

also unconfirmed for ages now:

https://blockchain.info/tx/a64ab804eeb0f20752714a04fdc0b965dda106a9eb6125a84bf50c015b6596de

any help?

same boat as you.

https://blockchain.info/tx/30deffd409515b085375abcb1dc04c00d55b9040130fecf2661ab8083122f621

2weiX

legendary

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1005

this space intentionally left blank

also unconfirmed for ages now:

https://blockchain.info/tx/a64ab804eeb0f20752714a04fdc0b965dda106a9eb6125a84bf50c015b6596de

any help?

giantdragon

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1002

Quote from: picobit on April 03, 2013, 12:48:34 PM

In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm.

I am telling about standard payments and tried myself - small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days.

JonSnow

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

What happens if someone send bitcoins to one of the Shared Send addresses that is no longer valid?

picobit

hero member

Activity: 547

Merit: 500

Decor in numeris

Quote from: giantdragon on April 03, 2013, 12:26:53 PM

Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?

In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm.

giantdragon

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1002

Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?

malevolent

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 1722

Quote from: techwtf on April 03, 2013, 05:47:43 AM

http://blockchain.info/tx/590a504f5cd2494bc0c0e49bd71069fe11aaf7016980e3d911a97e464951fa2e
WTF this tx...

Basically what your nickname says.

Technical WTF

techwtf

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

http://blockchain.info/tx/590a504f5cd2494bc0c0e49bd71069fe11aaf7016980e3d911a97e464951fa2e
WTF this tx...

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4794

Quote from: SgtSpike on April 01, 2013, 07:17:39 PM

That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct? I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.

Based on that statement, "miners revenue divided by the number of transactions", it would seem that the chart makes the assumption that market forces drive up mining costs until they approach break-even with revenue.

So the chart takes the total block reward expressed in U.S. dollars (subsidy + fees) and divides it by the total number of transactions in the block.

If the reward is high, and mining costs have not grown fast enough to keep up, then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially high. If the mining reward does not keep up with costs, but miners continue to mine at a loss (perhaps with visions of future value?) then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially low.

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: molecular on April 01, 2013, 05:42:44 PM

Those transaction costs seem high:

That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct? I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.

molecular

donator

Activity: 2772

Merit: 1019

Those transaction costs seem high:

Topic: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics - page 64. (Read 482537 times)