I don't see a 'bank deposit' button in my wallet - just PingIt and Phone deposit.
Is the Sofort deposit method something you are working on or should it be active now?
Topic: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics - page 93. (Read 482537 times)
November 01, 2012, 11:40:53 AM
November 01, 2012, 10:39:06 AM
piuk, Have you read PM. Why are you ignoring me?
October 31, 2012, 11:30:04 PM
- Ability to supply a private key directly to the API to send funds without needing a My Wallet account.
The instructions for that:
You can now replace the guid in the send api (https://blockchain.info/api/api_send) with a Hex encoded private key.
https://blockchain.info/merchant/4d6c9dff493fcd2da9508e01c8b13461d37e3d8b6df1732942d3257874051362/payment?to=$address&amount=$amount
$address = destination bitcoin address.
$amount = amount to send in satoshi.
https://blockchain.info/merchant/4d6c9dff493fcd2da9508e01c8b13461d37e3d8b6df1732942d3257874051362/payment?to=$address&amount=$amount
$address = destination bitcoin address.
$amount = amount to send in satoshi.
October 31, 2012, 09:49:16 PM
Couple of updates:
- Improved synchronisation to prevent double spends from occurring when submitting a high volume of transactions.
- Merchant API now supports compressed private keys.
- Fee parameter added to send API.
- Ability to supply a private key directly to the API to send funds without needing a My Wallet account.
- Improvements to Bitcoind status monitoring (https://blockchain.info/status_check). Recently two nodes feel behind causing an error "cannot find map prev tx" error when trying to submit certain transactions.
- Improved synchronisation to prevent double spends from occurring when submitting a high volume of transactions.
- Merchant API now supports compressed private keys.
- Fee parameter added to send API.
- Ability to supply a private key directly to the API to send funds without needing a My Wallet account.
- Improvements to Bitcoind status monitoring (https://blockchain.info/status_check). Recently two nodes feel behind causing an error "cannot find map prev tx" error when trying to submit certain transactions.
October 30, 2012, 08:54:26 PM
Quote
The (you received) value is exacly = (value at time of transaction). This happens even on old transactions. Sometimes if I click again to open the transaction summary, the value show correctly.
Thanks, i will look into it.
Thanks, i will look into it.
Update:
1- I see that opening the transaction summary with short interval of time make the value show wrongly
2- If I wait for example a minute, and reopen the transaction summary, the value may show correctly again.
3- (Value at time of transaction) always show the correct information
October 30, 2012, 12:16:24 PM
...
Testing New Deposit Method
Instant bank transfers now available from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
https://blockchain.info/wallet/deposit-bank-transfer
Bitinstant cash deposits have been removed temporarily. For updates see http://blog.bitinstant.com.
-----------
Edit: First few orders processed. However EUR and PLN have been disabled for the moment while I wait for clarification from sofort on an issue.
Testing New Deposit Method
Instant bank transfers now available from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
https://blockchain.info/wallet/deposit-bank-transfer
Bitinstant cash deposits have been removed temporarily. For updates see http://blog.bitinstant.com.
-----------
Edit: First few orders processed. However EUR and PLN have been disabled for the moment while I wait for clarification from sofort on an issue.
Sofort-banking is not available in Spain, please correct that on "How it works" page
October 30, 2012, 07:27:26 AM
piuk, can you reveal the volume going through your anonymizer? More specifically, I'm wondering how many bitcoins can realistically come from the same source per day without those coins getting mixed with themselves.
Coins will never be mixed with themselves, they will just sit until clean funds are available. So If you start sending through enough funds that transactions are getting significantly delayed then you are hitting the limits. However the bonus can be activated to get everything moved through.
The (you received) value is exacly = (value at time of transaction). This happens even on old transactions. Sometimes if I click again to open the transaction summary, the value show correctly.
Thanks, i will look into it. Also thank you for the suggestions, I will revisit them soon.
I was wondering when you would be running into this issue since I first saw the explicit Rubics-white-center-with-text but how about fixing the white center and changing the hue of the whole thing? Or making two center pieces blue? With 2 center pieces of the same color it would obviously not be a Rubics cube 
It's not bad, but it still has the amateurish look of the original logo. I've given everyones feedback to the designer, lets see if he can come up with something better.
Testing New Deposit Method
Instant bank transfers now available from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
https://blockchain.info/wallet/deposit-bank-transfer
Bitinstant cash deposits have been removed temporarily. For updates see http://blog.bitinstant.com.
-----------
Edit: First few orders processed. However EUR and PLN have been disabled for the moment while I wait for clarification from sofort on an issue.
October 29, 2012, 11:20:30 PM
Piuk,
Something strange is happening on transaction summary.
The (you received) value is exacly = (value at time of transaction). This happens even on old transactions. Sometimes if I click again to open the transaction summary, the value show correctly.
Something strange is happening on transaction summary.
The (you received) value is exacly = (value at time of transaction). This happens even on old transactions. Sometimes if I click again to open the transaction summary, the value show correctly.
October 29, 2012, 11:08:55 PM
Old one is way better. Is the rubix cube copyrighted?
Yes, that is why a new one is needed. It's not urgent though.
I was wondering when you would be running into this issue since I first saw the explicit Rubics-white-center-with-text but how about fixing the white center and changing the hue of the whole thing? Or making two center pieces blue? With 2 center pieces of the same color it would obviously not be a Rubics cube
October 29, 2012, 08:29:17 PM
Piuk,
I think will be more interesting if the informations of Transactions Summary not be on a popup window. I would like to see it on a click to expand/collapse.
What do you think?
I think will be more interesting if the informations of Transactions Summary not be on a popup window. I would like to see it on a click to expand/collapse.
What do you think?
October 29, 2012, 03:16:15 PM
Feedback wanted on possible new logo. What one is better?
vs original:
i like the new one! vs original:
October 29, 2012, 09:11:18 AM
Why don't you take the cube apart, and make a chain of colored blocks. Then you can write blockchain alongside it. :-)
I am hopeless at drawing, but I hope you see what I mean.
I am hopeless at drawing, but I hope you see what I mean.
October 29, 2012, 09:03:55 AM
Old one is way better. Is the rubix cube copyrighted?
Yes, that is why a new one is needed. It's not urgent though.
October 29, 2012, 08:57:56 AM
The new one sux.
I actually agree with MPOE-PR for once... I prefer the old one.+1
Old one is way better. Is the rubix cube copyrighted?
October 29, 2012, 06:13:02 AM
piuk, can you reveal the volume going through your anonymizer? More specifically, I'm wondering how many bitcoins can realistically come from the same source per day without those coins getting mixed with themselves.
October 29, 2012, 12:21:36 AM
Maybe with some huge tower on the logo? The blockchain is like a giant robot that everyone listens to...
October 29, 2012, 12:08:21 AM
I like the old one too. More colorful. It's not even the design, it's the monotone blue that feels too cold.
October 28, 2012, 10:47:26 PM
The new one sux.
I actually agree with MPOE-PR for once... I prefer the old one.+1
Old one is way better. Is the rubix cube copyrighted?
October 28, 2012, 08:57:08 PM
old logo is better
October 28, 2012, 08:39:25 PM
The old one is much better.
Jump to: