You are a very hard-working guy, bitmover.
Thanks. I had a lot of time to study JavaScript and python in this quarantine. I like to work on this. I think i will take a break now, before my next project (no plans yet)
Thanks. However, the important thing is at the end, how do you feel about pie chart, bar chart and especially the difference between horizontal versus vertical bar charts?
i had a little chat with a friend who is statistician and he said barcharts are the way to go (just like the article I shared earlier)
Vertical / Horizontal depends on the amount of data you have.
Personally, I will just keep pie charts if I have less than 5 values to compare. Otherwise, bar charts.
I think horizontal ones are more beautiful. But I like vertical ones as well.
Edit:
I will spend time to look at your updates and will focus on the last one, for Segwit.
I noticied some miners are really resistant to segwit
Take a look for example EMCD in daily data.
It mined 3 blocks. No empty blocks. How come they only have 37.2% segwit adoption while all others have 50%?
They are intentionally removing segwit transactions, you can see that when you compare their total reward: it is lower than the others, only 7.08BTC per block, while the average is 7.36.
I am thinking about sharing this kind of data in the mining board, but I am afraid of those moderators who just delete everything lol
I think it is important that people become aware that some mining pools are getting lower rewards just to favor legacy transactions.
Edit2:
This can also be seen here:
There are no miners in the bottom right side of the chart: Low Reward and High Adoption.
But you can see many miners in the bottom left side: Low Reward and low adoption.
All high reward miners are in the top right side: High Reward and High adoption.
if you want to work with the raw data:
https://loyce.club/bitmover/blockdata.lastweek.txthttps://loyce.club/blockdata/blockdata.lastday.txtI have all that data in json format in the domain, which I prefer. I can help you access it if you need.