Blocksize - page 3. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3080

Quote from: oblivi on November 17, 2015, 01:40:17 PM

2 MB so we have extra time to work on the Lightning Network. 8 maybe is a good idea too, but it may be too much of a hardcore step of a sudden that may bring some problems. If there is an huge adoption all of a sudden, its not like 8 would be enough anyway, we need LN.

/thread

(not saying I support 2MB, but even the over-baked BIP101 schedule isn't enough for worldwide levels of adoption, at least according to it's author)

eddie13

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2262

BTC or BUST

Quote from: spazzdla on November 17, 2015, 01:33:39 PM

Quote from: eddie13 on November 17, 2015, 01:31:55 PM

I'm not 100% convinced that it is necessary.. I just hope they don't go and screw it up..

Then vote stay the same.

I think a move to 8MB and hold is a safe move.

Sorry for being such an ignorant noob but how exactly do you place your vote? There is nothing to click.. ??

spazzdla

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Hum.. lots of different opinions... complicates things greatly this does.

spazzdla

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Carlton Banks on November 17, 2015, 01:39:04 PM

Quote from: spazzdla on November 17, 2015, 01:33:39 PM

Quote from: eddie13 on November 17, 2015, 01:31:55 PM

I'm not 100% convinced that it is necessary.. I just hope they don't go and screw it up..

Then vote stay the same.

I think a move to 8MB and hold is a safe move.

Lol what's wrong with 4. I'm not sure that the 4MB option is getting a fair hearing Grin

(tip: split "miners decide/dynamic" into separate categories, both have separate BIPs that could arguably represent each voting option)

Didn't know 4mB was a thing.. lol.

I am lazy and didn't want to change the poll opitions lol.

oblivi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 501

2 MB so we have extra time to work on the Lightning Network. 8 maybe is a good idea too, but it may be too much of a hardcore step of a sudden that may bring some problems. If there is an huge adoption all of a sudden, its not like 8 would be enough anyway, we need LN.

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3080

Quote from: spazzdla on November 17, 2015, 01:33:39 PM

Quote from: eddie13 on November 17, 2015, 01:31:55 PM

I'm not 100% convinced that it is necessary.. I just hope they don't go and screw it up..

Then vote stay the same.

I think a move to 8MB and hold is a safe move.

Lol what's wrong with 4. I'm not sure that the 4MB option is getting a fair hearing Grin

(tip: split "miners decide/dynamic" into separate categories, both have separate BIPs that could arguably represent each voting option)

emelac

full member

Activity: 184

Merit: 100

I choose 8MB because I think that's what the Chinese miners favor. Without their agreement it's pointless changing the block size, and they don't want anything bigger than 8MB as far as I know. The block size argument is damaging bitcoin's image, and I hope it gets resolved before next year.

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Eh I'm fine with whatever bitcoin currently is. And I think most opinions about blocksize are still unchanged, you might wanna check the old threads.

spazzdla

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Quote from: eddie13 on November 17, 2015, 01:31:55 PM

I'm not 100% convinced that it is necessary.. I just hope they don't go and screw it up..

Then vote stay the same.

I think a move to 8MB and hold is a safe move.

eddie13

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2262

BTC or BUST

I'm not 100% convinced that it is necessary.. I just hope they don't go and screw it up..

spazzdla

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

It's been awhile since blocksize has been talked about.. curious to everyones opinion.

Topic: Blocksize - page 3. (Read 2182 times)