Note : The account owner has contacted. He stated that it has nothing to do with this person. I apologize to him.
Apology accepted. Thank you.
I'm a "her" btw, not a "him". But it's OK.
Topic: blurryeyed, Unfair negative About Trust (Read 255 times)
Note : The account owner has contacted. He stated that it has nothing to do with this person. I apologize to him.
Apology accepted. Thank you.
I'm a "her" btw, not a "him". But it's OK.
Second, when was the last Yobit campaign?
Over a year ago, that's when I tagged him. It's taken him a year & now he gives me a day to reply before starting this crybaby BS thread......lol Probably wants to sell the account clean or has been refused sig campaigns.
Who cares. I don't.
I hope you get out of puberty as soon as possible and become a man.
Second, when was the last Yobit campaign?
Over a year ago, that's when I tagged him. It's taken him a year & now he gives me a day to reply before starting this crybaby BS thread......lol Probably wants to sell the account clean or has been refused sig campaigns.
Who cares. I don't.
OP, first thing is that you should remove your retaliatory feedback on blurryeyed. I get that you're pissed off, but you're basically doing the same thing you've charged him with doing (and I'm not saying your wrong there, either).
Second, when was the last Yobit campaign? There isn't one running now is there? I noticed you're not wearing any Yobit advertisement in your sig space now, and I hadn't heard of Yobit having a campaign in months. Regardless, I do think that blurryeyed ought to reconsider his negative on you. Yobit is controversial indeed, and even a lot of DT members swear they're a scam--but if you don't consider their stupid investbox scheme and their newest Ponzi thing, they're not a straight-up scam exchange.
Not that I would vouch for them, because I won't. They've never scammed me, but I've read the horror stories about their customer service and think they're one of the shittiest exchanges out there (if not one of the scammiest IMO).
Second, when was the last Yobit campaign? There isn't one running now is there? I noticed you're not wearing any Yobit advertisement in your sig space now, and I hadn't heard of Yobit having a campaign in months. Regardless, I do think that blurryeyed ought to reconsider his negative on you. Yobit is controversial indeed, and even a lot of DT members swear they're a scam--but if you don't consider their stupid investbox scheme and their newest Ponzi thing, they're not a straight-up scam exchange.
Not that I would vouch for them, because I won't. They've never scammed me, but I've read the horror stories about their customer service and think they're one of the shittiest exchanges out there (if not one of the scammiest IMO).
@vincetcm:
Hello crybaby.
I didn't reply to your PM because I've not logged in for a month or two, but if I had logged in & seen your PM within the one day window you gave me my answer would still be the same. F*ck you.
If you want to prostitute your profile for a few sats to promote a known scam then you'll have to put your big boy pants on over your nappy & deal with the shit.
You're not the first scam promoter I've tagged who squeals like a drowning rat & you won't be the last. Now you're a trust abusing scam promoter instead of just a scam promoter - great job.
Hello crybaby.
I didn't reply to your PM because I've not logged in for a month or two, but if I had logged in & seen your PM within the one day window you gave me my answer would still be the same. F*ck you.
If you want to prostitute your profile for a few sats to promote a known scam then you'll have to put your big boy pants on over your nappy & deal with the shit.
You're not the first scam promoter I've tagged who squeals like a drowning rat & you won't be the last. Now you're a trust abusing scam promoter instead of just a scam promoter - great job.
You complain about wrong use of negative feedback but then go ahead to abuse it too. Two wrongs don't make a right.
The accounts in question are not on DT and have been distrusted by a number of members perhaps due to the decisions they have been making.
IconFirm - https://loyce.club/trust/2021-01-23_Sat_04.05h/841288.html
blurryeyed - https://loyce.club/trust/2021-01-23_Sat_04.05h/885996.html
So I don't see why you are so worried.
Some people never reverse their negative feedback however wrong it may be even if you send them a message to review it. So, as long as they are not on DT, everything so be good.
The accounts in question are not on DT and have been distrusted by a number of members perhaps due to the decisions they have been making.
IconFirm - https://loyce.club/trust/2021-01-23_Sat_04.05h/841288.html
blurryeyed - https://loyce.club/trust/2021-01-23_Sat_04.05h/885996.html
So I don't see why you are so worried.
That's not the fact actually. If the tag is not appropriate, there should be a way I think. And I believe the red tag is a wrong one for promoting yobit.
I had also taken such tag in this way, that I shouldn’t have problem with tag which are not from DT but now I'm carrying with a negative tag which certainly is wrong use of the feedback system. The user was not in DT but recently he got into DT2.
Who knows someday blurryeyed will also be in DT2.
Why worry about something you can not control?I had also taken such tag in this way, that I shouldn’t have problem with tag which are not from DT but now I'm carrying with a negative tag which certainly is wrong use of the feedback system. The user was not in DT but recently he got into DT2.
Who knows someday blurryeyed will also be in DT2.
Some people never reverse their negative feedback however wrong it may be even if you send them a message to review it. So, as long as they are not on DT, everything so be good.
Participating in a campaign that is legal in the forum is not a crime.
Who will determine campaigns are legal or illegal? Am I missing something what does mean legal on the forum? I can't find any rules about the legal and illegal campaign. The forum will not prevent you even you wear Bitconnect signature now, does it mean that will be legal? I would ask the moderators to do what's necessary.
Surprising even a Hero Member doesn't know how works trust the system and wondering you are involving moderators regarding your feedback. Also seems you are abusing the trusted network by leaving retaliatory negative feedback. Anyway, I think @suchmoon forgot to leave neutral feedback on your profile due to promoting Yobit. And I think so neutral feedback is enough to mark Yobit participants.
Participating in a campaign that is legal in the forum is not a crime.
If with "not a crime" you mean it's allowed by forum rules, then indeed it's allowed on the forum. But scamming, and running a scam exchange, is allowed too! Feedback is generally considered to be useful for things that aren't covered by forum rules, and promoting a scam makes it likely some people are going to call you out and tag you for that.What's with the retaliation negative feedback?
This would be a great text for Neutral feedback, but it's trust abuse to make it negative. Please read my Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
The only person that can remove your negative feedback is the user who placed it. Retaliating doesn't help your case.
If you think someone's feedback is inaccurate, exclude them from your Trust list.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Both accounts blurryeyed and IconFirm are not selected into DT and his neg tags have not visible to many other members here. Many people make ~ to them just because of inappropriate negative feedbacks.
Neutral feedback is okay in this case, just my opinion.
OP, I don't think that will be a problem for you as long as you are correct here.
I had also taken such tag in this way, that I shouldn’t have problem with tag which are not from DT but now I'm carrying with a negative tag which certainly is wrong use of the feedback system. The user was not in DT but recently he got into DT2.
Who knows someday blurryeyed will also be in DT2.
Trust isn't moderated so there's nothing Mods or anyone else can do about the feedback. Are they on DT now or something as I don't see the feedback as trusted but assume that's why it's an issue now. Negative feedback for wearing the Yobit signature was deemed not appropriate last year I believe when the campaign launched. It did I think result in a bunch of temp bans... can't remember.
Either way you've done all you can by PMing them. They either respond or do not, but you just have to move on and ignore it. Any reason they left this feedback now that you know of? They didn't put a reference down, which makes it less than ideal feedback anyways.
Either way you've done all you can by PMing them. They either respond or do not, but you just have to move on and ignore it. Any reason they left this feedback now that you know of? They didn't put a reference down, which makes it less than ideal feedback anyways.
Both accounts blurryeyed and IconFirm are not selected into DT and his neg tags have not visible to many other members here. Many people make ~ to them just because of inappropriate negative feedbacks.
Neutral feedback is okay in this case, just my opinion.
OP, I don't think that will be a problem for you as long as you are correct here.
Trust isn't moderated so there's nothing Mods or anyone else can do about the feedback. Are they on DT now or something as I don't see the feedback as trusted but assume that's why it's an issue now. Negative feedback for wearing the Yobit signature was deemed not appropriate last year I believe when the campaign launched. It did I think result in a bunch of temp bans... can't remember.
Either way you've done all you can by PMing them. They either respond or do not, but you just have to move on and ignore it. Any reason they left this feedback now that you know of? They didn't put a reference down, which makes it less than ideal feedback anyways.
Either way you've done all you can by PMing them. They either respond or do not, but you just have to move on and ignore it. Any reason they left this feedback now that you know of? They didn't put a reference down, which makes it less than ideal feedback anyways.
This user has problems with the YOBIT exchange. Therefore, it attacks people using YOBIT signature.
Participating in a campaign that is legal in the forum is not a crime.
I do not know the person, we did not have any interaction.
Last week I texted him and his other account to fix the trust.
It did not give a feedback to my message.
I would ask the moderators to do what's necessary.
Thanks.
profile blurryeyed
second account IconFirm
Note : The account owner has contacted. He stated that it has nothing to do with this person. I apologize to him.
Participating in a campaign that is legal in the forum is not a crime.
I do not know the person, we did not have any interaction.
Last week I texted him and his other account to fix the trust.
It did not give a feedback to my message.
I would ask the moderators to do what's necessary.
Thanks.
profile blurryeyed
Note : The account owner has contacted. He stated that it has nothing to do with this person. I apologize to him.
Jump to: