Topic: BMR vs MRO. Time to make it fair. (Read 2106 times)

Everyone did not get used it. the renaming made it a community coin and not a tft coin.
And that is a good thing.

Monero was voted by community. Lamenting after the fact is silly.

There are now few bcn clones.  Why not direct attention to those and offer support. I remember at the very beginning people called the coin a shitcoin. Scam coin and pump and dump. It seemed people formed their opinion without reading the thread. Please go over the original thread and educate yourself. Now it seems those individuals that made a rash decision see their mistake. To what end is unknown to me. Read the posts from bcn, bitmonero, monero, honeypenny.  LEARN about the coin and offer your support to the coin you think is worth you attention. 

Firstly I liked both names but agressive Monero fans made my sympathy for it go down

Bitmonero is a pretty cool name for a coin. Everyone got used to it and there was no need to rename

Oh, ok.
But I will not give up

IMO that BitMonero is better just because we used to this name. And, personally , I like ''bit'' in the name

I like both.
Biggest problem is that someone is going to launch fake monero 

+1

voted for Bitmonero but it means nothing. all that's kinda stupid

I do prefer Monero over Bitmonero by far.

rias

i thought that it was made clear the miner change was pretty simple. I am not a coder by any means but consensus came across ahhhhh. it was a simple coding change.

there is nothing wrong with alt coins. Rias, why dont you lead the masses and show us how it is done. I have made it clear, I am a sheep. I will follow the most fair and promising tech.

I think most people are sheep and will follow as well. The unfair thing that happend with bitmonero is
1. TFT proposed a vote for name but this voting never materialized. options were never given
--> he chose the name.
2. TFT did not take into consideration the 60 second confirmation time. it was pointed out the possible flaw but he did not awknowlege it.
--he changed it to 1 minute. making it easier to get orphan blocks.
3. OP was not updated regularly. making it very hard for new comers to participate.
--he did not respond and kept mining the coin himself. what he was most content with was getting a fork of bcn. he saw the pontential. given the current HR, he was right. but he jumped first. others volunteered to help. I do not know to what extent he included those people.

I do not think it was instamined. it is difficult now, and I feel you feel left out. I understand that. I tried for 5 days to participate with mro but couldnt. it was directly due to TFT structure.

Because it is an attack Not one regular person has come forward and said they voted BMR. We had asked TFT to reconsider the name even before he was launching. We still mined after he launched it as BMR.

I remember tacotime giving up on an immediate fork because he himself thought and indicated how multiple forks only harm each other and even then sadly it went down to this.

I would have been ok with BMR but then TFT unfolded his flop card which was to merge mine with Bytecoin and I knew where he is coming from, where others like OP/Rias/Bytecoin miners are coming from and even some of the other mysterious ways the CN team is handling MRO. It tells us that MRO is on the right track.

Taking over the control to instamine is the attack on original BitMonero.

monero

I concur.  I voted Monero as soon as the poll went up.

BitMonero is an absolutely awful name.  This may be intended as an attack on the coin.

Maybe because there was never an actual poll on the name, only take-over-the-control operation.

Why do I have the feeling that closely before the end of the 24 hours period, they will coincidentally be a lot of BMR votes?

:whistles:

silly discussion...
I will keep calling it Monero... With or without poll

Monero is a shorter and better name for marketing strategy

How is it even related to Bytecoin?