█=█ BoostCoin █=█ New team, new plans - page 179.

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Hi, can someone help me out with configuring my .bat.
SGminer giving me some troubles and I can't figure out what the problem is (Though I suspect it might be intensity related).
I' running two R9 280x's.
Cheers for your troubles.

I run R9 280's as well, but with all default setting, no overclocking, so im not sure i'll be able to help much.
One thing to try it a new .bat file similar to this, and also delete any .bin files in the SGminer folder

Code:

timeout /t 10

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

sgminer -k marucoin -I 19 --auto-gpu --auto-fan --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://<> -u username -p password

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

There is something funky about block 537. if you are resyncing a new wallet it may stop at block 537, if it does, simply restart the wallet to get past it.

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Quote from: policymaker on May 18, 2014, 03:01:40 PM

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 02:39:23 PM

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.

so what is the plan? after this block the coin will be OK to mine again? I want to point my ati card to nova pool but my resources are limited and I want to w8 till its surely fixed!

Yes we need to wait for word from nova pool that their wallet has been updated

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 02:39:23 PM

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.

Agreed, let the PoS blocks solve automatically until after 1300, shortly after that the diff will drop, then start pumping again

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Quote from: policymaker on May 18, 2014, 02:24:18 PM

mammix is this minable with nvidia ccminer? Or not? They havent replied in cuda miner thread(I guess not?)

Unfortunately not, cudaminer will need to be able to hash the 13 different algos that make up x13.
Maybe someone has already looked into an x11 version of Cuda i'm not sure. if they have then adding the extra 2 hash algos should not be too difficult

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 02:39:23 PM

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.

so what is the plan? after this block the coin will be OK to mine again? I want to point my ati card to nova pool but my resources are limited and I want to w8 till its surely fixed!

mumus

sr. member

Activity: 291

Merit: 250

The boost.suprnova.cc pool is online with active miners who tries to solve the high diff block, but in my opinion it's waste of hash power. We should start mining after block height 1300. Block are resolved with PoS now.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

mammix is this minable with nvidia ccminer? Or not? They havent replied in cuda miner thread(I guess not?)

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 01:54:25 PM

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 12:43:24 PM

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 07:38:54 AM

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 04:17:38 AM

Quote from: MacMuffin on May 18, 2014, 12:27:44 AM

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear the behind this coin there is a professional programmer.

+1 Thank you from me too...
Is there any alive pool now , maybe Suprnova?

mumus

sr. member

Activity: 291

Merit: 250

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 12:43:24 PM

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 07:38:54 AM

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 04:17:38 AM

Quote from: MacMuffin on May 18, 2014, 12:27:44 AM

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

OK. Thanks for the update and sorry if I underestimated your work. It's good the hear that behind this coin there is a professional programmer.

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

★ v1.1.0.0 Wallet client downloads ★
Windows:
https://mega.co.nz/#!UcoSHKrT!sF7a8UxsWAIIIUmUfGuWVMsBR1Q18-289HJ5-XctZj0

Source:
https://github.com/mammix2/BoostCoin

This fixes the difficulty problems after block 1300. As said before this will cause a hard fork at block 1300 due to the Proof Or Work setting being different thereafter. You must all update your wallets as soon as possible. The OSX wallet will be ready in the next few hours.

Also updated are the PoS interest rates, and someone asked for a logo in the wallet so i put that in too

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Quote from: mumus on May 18, 2014, 07:38:54 AM

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 04:17:38 AM

Quote from: MacMuffin on May 18, 2014, 12:27:44 AM

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

Ah yes GOODcoin, i helped them with that coin too

To confirm, this release will cause a hard fork at the determined block number. This is because anyone on the old wallet will get an invalid Proof of Work for any blocks mined after. Once the wallets are released the seednodes will be updated, so its advisable to delete the peers.dat file to make sure the first time the new wallet connects is to the new updated wallets

mumus

sr. member

Activity: 291

Merit: 250

Quote from: mammix2 on May 18, 2014, 04:17:38 AM

Quote from: MacMuffin on May 18, 2014, 12:27:44 AM

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

I would suggest reconsidering releasing only a difficulty fix to the wild without doing a proper hard fork from a specific block number. (fortunately the coin has PoS blocks). I'm not an expert but as far as I know without a proper hard fork and giving enough time for everybody to update, the chances for blockchain forks are pretty high. One coin that I know of and had similar problems and succeed to do a proper update, was Goodcoin (https://github.com/stolenjs/gcfinal)

MacMuffin

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: tricass on May 18, 2014, 05:02:27 AM

given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?

I actually minted some coins so I think the new blocks are PoS blocks.

tricass

sr. member

Activity: 394

Merit: 250

Crypto enthusiast

given the pools haven't found a single block for over 41h and diff still high who are the ones mining this coin?

mammix2

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1004

Quote from: MacMuffin on May 18, 2014, 12:27:44 AM

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

Very soon, i've got the fix coded in and has been proven on testnet and on a private fork of the Main chain.
All i need to do is compile both Windows and OSX wallets and release them.

Im away today but should be able to get them done this evening when i'm back

MacMuffin

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Any ETA on the fix, other than the at block 2000?

brother3

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 500

Quote from: hero18688 on May 17, 2014, 10:14:27 AM

Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.

I just hope people don't mine on a bad fork

hero18688

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Blocks over 600.There must be another pool or hashmonster.

brother3

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 500

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on May 17, 2014, 08:32:18 AM

Quote from: niejian_2003 on May 17, 2014, 08:26:14 AM

There are no new mine pool. . boost.suprnova.cc points less than a block away

+1 ... What happoned with Suprnova , It seems It stucked on block 537...

Awaiting fix from dev...

Topic: █=█ BoostCoin █=█ New team, new plans - page 179. (Read 299700 times)