[Bot] Automatic Signature Campaign Manager | Quality Control | Analytics | +MORE

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: marcotheminer on April 06, 2017, 11:42:12 AM

Please let me know what features are most desirable!

Let's get to that later : P
I do remember checking the thread previously,never saw the dashboard pictures! Looks beautiful.You just changed the signature campaign management game.Are you using bulma.io for the css part along with vue.js ?

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Please let me know what features are most desirable!

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Collider on March 23, 2017, 08:05:16 PM

Hey Marco
Good to see you back in action. I was a part of your bit x campaign in the past which was one of the best campaign till date. All the best for your upcoming projects.
Regards

Thank you and I'm glad you enjoyed that campaign!

Collider

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Hey Marco
Good to see you back in action. I was a part of your bit x campaign in the past which was one of the best campaign till date. All the best for your upcoming projects.
Regards

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: illusioNiZt on March 22, 2017, 01:51:21 PM

Thanks for posting screenshots it looks really good so far is this browser based?, good luck with the project.

Yes, and thank you.

illusioNiZt

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 252

Thanks for posting screenshots it looks really good so far is this browser based?, good luck with the project.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 22, 2017, 07:58:22 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on March 22, 2017, 12:13:49 AM

Quote from: ranlo on March 22, 2017, 12:10:17 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

I was under the impression that part wouldn't be automated, and would instead just pick random posts for you to view and analyze. Most people's quality remains fairly static (meaning they are either good or bad posters).

Correct! That's an excellent way to put it: "most people's quality remains fairly static", a random selection gives you a sample of the whole and so allows you to make an initial observation (all in one place too).

Provided, the 'static' method isn't all that perfect.My post could be highly construtive,lengthy and bypass all the standards of the bot but what if it's off-topic ? I mean the bot won't take the topic/title into consideration while parsing the posts so a smart signature spammer might just post random construtive crap in any thread without any real meaning to it and the bot would still count that as a good post.Damn,too many test cases I can think of right now Tongue

P.S. : Make the bot open-source,we can bring in heavy AI implementations.

The manager reviews the posts, not the bot. The manager can look into the context of the posts of any member if they have a suspicion.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: target on March 22, 2017, 08:03:41 AM

Is this for sale like its going to be available for everyone whose willing to buy?
I am open to possibilities to apply as signature campaign manager although I don't have much experience with it, the bot can help me make decisions and do the stuff a manager can do.

Yes it is, you may contact me if interested.

target

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1041

Is this for sale like its going to be available for everyone whose willing to buy?
I am open to possibilities to apply as signature campaign manager although I don't have much experience with it, the bot can help me make decisions and do the stuff a manager can do.

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 22, 2017, 07:58:22 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on March 22, 2017, 12:13:49 AM

Quote from: ranlo on March 22, 2017, 12:10:17 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

I was under the impression that part wouldn't be automated, and would instead just pick random posts for you to view and analyze. Most people's quality remains fairly static (meaning they are either good or bad posters).

Correct! That's an excellent way to put it: "most people's quality remains fairly static", a random selection gives you a sample of the whole and so allows you to make an initial observation (all in one place too).

Provided, the 'static' method isn't all that perfect.My post could be highly construtive,lengthy and bypass all the standards of the bot but what if it's off-topic ? I mean the bot won't take the topic/title into consideration while parsing the posts so a smart signature spammer might just post random construtive crap in any thread without any real meaning to it and the bot would still count that as a good post.Damn,too many test cases I can think of right now Tongue

P.S. : Make the bot open-source,we can bring in heavy AI implementations.

Making it opensource would be good, i think the rest of hte coders can share what they have in mind for all of them to test which works best of the participants.

Joel_Jantsen

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1308

Get your game girl

Quote from: marcotheminer on March 22, 2017, 12:13:49 AM

Quote from: ranlo on March 22, 2017, 12:10:17 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

I was under the impression that part wouldn't be automated, and would instead just pick random posts for you to view and analyze. Most people's quality remains fairly static (meaning they are either good or bad posters).

Correct! That's an excellent way to put it: "most people's quality remains fairly static", a random selection gives you a sample of the whole and so allows you to make an initial observation (all in one place too).

Provided, the 'static' method isn't all that perfect.My post could be highly construtive,lengthy and bypass all the standards of the bot but what if it's off-topic ? I mean the bot won't take the topic/title into consideration while parsing the posts so a smart signature spammer might just post random construtive crap in any thread without any real meaning to it and the bot would still count that as a good post.Damn,too many test cases I can think of right now Tongue

P.S. : Make the bot open-source,we can bring in heavy AI implementations.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: ranlo on March 22, 2017, 12:10:17 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

I was under the impression that part wouldn't be automated, and would instead just pick random posts for you to view and analyze. Most people's quality remains fairly static (meaning they are either good or bad posters).

Correct! That's an excellent way to put it: "most people's quality remains fairly static", a random selection gives you a sample of the whole and so allows you to make an initial observation (all in one place too).

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: ice18 on March 21, 2017, 11:26:08 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on March 21, 2017, 06:24:59 PM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

The bot randomly selects a number of posts from enrolled members, which are displayed on one page in text form for a manager to quickly scan through. If spam is noticed, the manager can click on the member to confirm a suspicion and remove, ban, or penalise the member.

If this feature will function accurately to avoid spammers and eliminate bad quality post, It will be a great help to campaign managers, even members with no experience in managing campaigns can do the job easily.Good job OP.

That's the aim! To allow anyone to manage a campaign without much prior knowledge and/or experience. It greatly reduces the cost of running and managing a campaign and significantly reduces the amount of time needed to do so.

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

I was under the impression that part wouldn't be automated, and would instead just pick random posts for you to view and analyze. Most people's quality remains fairly static (meaning they are either good or bad posters).

ice18

hero member

Activity: 2492

Merit: 542

Quote from: marcotheminer on March 21, 2017, 06:24:59 PM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

The bot randomly selects a number of posts from enrolled members, which are displayed on one page in text form for a manager to quickly scan through. If spam is noticed, the manager can click on the member to confirm a suspicion and remove, ban, or penalise the member.

If this feature will function accurately to avoid spammers and eliminate bad quality post, It will be a great help to campaign managers, even members with no experience in managing campaigns can do the job easily.Good job OP.

maydna

hero member

Activity: 2912

Merit: 556

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI

from what i see in the picture, the manager will easily to control the campaign in the dashboard, because its completed data that show by the bot. there are a data that show where category for the member post and its show in the percentage, i think the manager will not having difficult to check one by one all participants and its done by the bot. congratulate sir, i hope this bot can have success journey, btw i am curious with the price.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: LTU_btc on March 21, 2017, 06:49:07 PM

Is it the same bot which was used on Coinsbank signature campaign? If I remember correctly, there was some complaints that users didn't get payouts on time or their posts were counted incorrectly. If there are no bugs anymore it's great. Coinsbank was one of the best signature campaigns on bitcointalk.
And even if campaign are runned by bot, most important part is to have good mannager. Best example of it is Bitmixer: earlier it had tons of spammers, but when Lauda started to manage it, mostly shitposters were removed.

The bot has been re-coded, but yes it is similar to the Coinsbank campaign bot in features and operational ability! We may still encounter problems as with any application (none yet thankfully!), they will be tackled the moment, if, they arise.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1330

Slava Ukraini!

Is it the same bot which was used on Coinsbank signature campaign? If I remember correctly, there was some complaints that users didn't get payouts on time or their posts were counted incorrectly. If there are no bugs anymore it's great. Coinsbank was one of the best signature campaigns on bitcointalk.
And even if campaign are runned by bot, most important part is to have good mannager. Best example of it is Bitmixer: earlier it had tons of spammers, but when Lauda started to manage it, mostly shitposters were removed.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: illusioNiZt on March 21, 2017, 01:38:22 PM

Well you have a really nice idea which can benefit a lot of future campaigns in many ways good luck with your project, can you post some screenshots of it? thank you.

Some, not all, areas of the bot currently:

Dashboard

Details of a member

Configuration Panels

Payment Scheduling

Analytics

Ban

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Arcteryx on March 21, 2017, 02:33:47 PM

Coinroll had the same bot when they were still having users register on their application site just like this and vert similar to the one bitmixer uses. But they don't accept anymore applicants as it's a closed campaign now and for good. Undecided

Their bot seems to work and their campaigners are not complaining about having their stats show up on their own site's account page.
Payments are sent out manually but that seemed to be the only complaint but their members simply got use to those being delayed by a few days. Six days max at one point I think but that was in the middle of the campaign and not at the very start like what had happened with your product today with the last campaign using it, Tidex.
So maybe work out your bugs with devs from that campaign to make your offering of this to all campaigns a more perfect product.
Only suggesting this to you since you ran the bit-x (coinsbank) signature campaign and that was one of the best and longest running ones on here.
I couldn't even get in there with people being very pleased with how that was run by you and bitboy$.
So you know how these should run from the inside out and are the only one who can actually come out with a solid product for all signature campaign managers to use.

Thank you. My experience as a campaign manager does provide the knowledge needed to create a well-rounded and useful (and functioning) bot.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 21, 2017, 01:17:33 PM

How can a bot separate a "good quality post" from a "bad quality post" ? Ignore the message if your bot is using NLP and advanced AI concepts to perform the analysis.It's sort of a big achievement if a bot does that successfully.I will be curious to look at the code.

The bot randomly selects a number of posts from enrolled members, which are displayed on one page in text form for a manager to quickly scan through. If spam is noticed, the manager can click on the member to confirm a suspicion and remove, ban, or penalise the member.

Topic: [Bot] Automatic Signature Campaign Manager | Quality Control | Analytics | +MORE (Read 1550 times)