This is usually when a site changes the API Format return.
I will check in the next hours about this problem.
Last Time Poloniex had a problem it was for the same reason.
Topic: 【BOT】 🌟 C.A.T. Cryptocurrency Automatic Trader 🌟 (New Price List 04/2021) - page 205. (Read 531556 times)
September 25, 2015, 06:14:42 AM
September 25, 2015, 06:01:11 AM
Code:
2015-09-25 05:45:14| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:46:53| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:48:32| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:50:10| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:51:49| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:53:30| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:55:11| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:56:51| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 05:58:25| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:00:06| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:01:46| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:03:23| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:05:01| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:06:41| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:08:20| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:10:00| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:11:39| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:13:16| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:14:58| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:16:37| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:18:13| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:19:54| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:21:33| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:23:09| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:24:50| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:26:29| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:28:10| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:30:19| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:31:25| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
2015-09-25 06:33:04| Call Aborted! Json Result Error during returnTradeHistory Call Is Aborted After 10 retry
September 20, 2015, 07:53:08 AM
How about introducing a closed group for C.A.T. traders to try and improve each other by sharing thoughts, wishes and strategies?
September 19, 2015, 04:42:01 PM
Hi I am interested in purchasing CAT, I am curious do you have an option to run the application in headless mode?
Not meant to answer on behalf of Sampey, but I run C.A.T. on a VPS on Ubuntu Linux with xrdp. Whenever I want to access C.A.T. I connect to the xrdp service from anywhere.HTH
September 19, 2015, 02:10:16 PM
Hi I am interested in purchasing CAT, I am curious do you have an option to run the application in headless mode?
September 19, 2015, 02:03:41 PM
You can try this way
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
Hi Sampey,
the option create ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES does not work when you remove it.
It still makes pong orders even if you uncheck it.
Then I thought of two more options to add as a parameter.
- Delay second PING-PONG creating with X time.
- Never create second PING-PONG with less than X% difference between last PONG trade.
This way you can chain PING-PONG orders with some time in between to let the market cool down a bit.
Bit lost on the buy/sell pool thing.
Would you maybe consider adding an option to cat thats a bit simplified and lets a user just create nothing but sells always using no more than X coins but always randomizes the amount with an option that if ticked could be STOP when x coins have been sold. All the while still doing the -1 to stay ontop of the sell side.
Hope this makes sense but the way you described it and what the other guy said just has be a bit confused.
Edit: Tried to follow what you said the best I could and bot ended up doing more than one sell order.
September 19, 2015, 11:30:44 AM
You can try this way
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
Hi Sampey,
the option create ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES does not work when you remove it.
It still makes pong orders even if you uncheck it.
Then I thought of two more options to add as a parameter.
- Delay second PING-PONG creating with X time.
- Never create second PING-PONG with less than X% difference between last PONG trade.
This way you can chain PING-PONG orders with some time in between to let the market cool down a bit.
September 19, 2015, 08:02:17 AM
You can try this way
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
You can set a % GAIN OF 999 so pong will never ben completed
Remove option ALWAYS CREATE ORDERS FROM TRADES.
And C.A.T. won't create any PONG.
Then.
You can set a BUY/SELL Pool high value (Value is in total, you can have a preview of new order calculation) and you can limit with option "Stop Ping Creation if total orders amount is > X"
You can set Never Create Ping with Quantity > Y
Result will be very similar to the one you ask me.
September 19, 2015, 07:04:56 AM
I can't give you more info looking at a screenshot, are these orders ping-pong-both? It depends by how they are working inside C.A.T.
Started originally as two ping pongs.Edit: Can I create just pings "sells" with CAT that never go below x price and always do the +1 to stay on top ?
I got a good balance of existing coins I want to sell but can't babysit the market but don't want to pong the coin from the sells.
Hope that made sense, Ty.
Yes you can use all the Never Buy/Sell Under/Over available.
So after one sell completes, instead of trying to do a buy like it does now. I'd like it to do another sell between 1 & x with x being the value set in case of this example. It does another sell between 1 & 350 and repeats til coin sdupply is depleted or i stop it.
Understand now ?
September 19, 2015, 05:04:34 AM
I can't give you more info looking at a screenshot, are these orders ping-pong-both? It depends by how they are working inside C.A.T.
Started originally as two ping pongs.Edit: Can I create just pings "sells" with CAT that never go below x price and always do the +1 to stay on top ?
I got a good balance of existing coins I want to sell but can't babysit the market but don't want to pong the coin from the sells.
Hope that made sense, Ty.
Yes you can use all the Never Buy/Sell Under/Over available.
September 18, 2015, 08:02:13 PM
I can't give you more info looking at a screenshot, are these orders ping-pong-both? It depends by how they are working inside C.A.T.
Started originally as two ping pongs.Edit: Can I create just pings "sells" with CAT that never go below x price and always do the +1 to stay on top ?
I got a good balance of existing coins I want to sell but can't babysit the market but don't want to pong the coin from the sells.
Hope that made sense, Ty.
September 18, 2015, 02:52:19 PM
I can't give you more info looking at a screenshot, are these orders ping-pong-both? It depends by how they are working inside C.A.T.
September 18, 2015, 02:27:51 PM
In addition to my last two replied...
I've been running CAT for about 24hrs now... noticed this while working today but I seemed to have started competing with myself. Still going on now...
I've been running CAT for about 24hrs now... noticed this while working today but I seemed to have started competing with myself. Still going on now...
September 18, 2015, 08:04:31 AM
Ok now i remember.
Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
That option would be nice. As for priority, I thought trex / any exchange didn't do that. So like if someone sells 1000 coins. It's even distributed among all open orders at same price.Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
September 17, 2015, 06:30:33 PM
Ok now i remember.
Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
That option would be nice. As for priority, I thought trex / any exchange didn't do that. So like if someone sells 1000 coins. It's even distributed among all open orders at same price. Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
September 17, 2015, 06:29:16 PM
Ok now i remember.
Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
Many users doesn't wants to be always on top "alone" because bot can compete each other in an infinite +1 +1 +1 +1
So actually if you're on TOP you will remain on top (But remember that your order have priority over orders added later).
So, the only thing i can do is add an option "Always stay Alone on Top Orders Book" so users are able to choose.
September 17, 2015, 06:25:46 PM
I'm working in debug mode.
Probably i have found a case when recalculation is not triggered when you have the best price (with other users).
So, if i found this problem, i will correct immediatedly and release in 3.2 Version
Sounds good, please try to maybe look into the other thing too in the example where I used 5 orders and gap was left in between prices if I'm making sense ;-) Probably i have found a case when recalculation is not triggered when you have the best price (with other users).
So, if i found this problem, i will correct immediatedly and release in 3.2 Version
September 17, 2015, 06:23:16 PM
I'm working in debug mode.
Probably i have found a case when recalculation is not triggered when you have the best price (with other users).
So, if i found this problem, i will correct immediatedly and release in 3.2 Version
Probably i have found a case when recalculation is not triggered when you have the best price (with other users).
So, if i found this problem, i will correct immediatedly and release in 3.2 Version
September 17, 2015, 06:14:43 PM
Yes it was me.
I'm taking a look in debug mode
Ty... also like I said in other example.I'm taking a look in debug mode
Well, lets say I have order 1 @ 0.00000127, with the middle three orders gone because their owners cancelled them. Shouldnt CAT recalculate my buy at 0.00000124 ? The way it does now it leaves it at 0.00000127 costing me an extra 0.00000003 sats.
I hope this makes sense but recalucation only seems to work to give you the best price on the buy / sell side but not recalculate when other people remove their orders.
Recalculate functions try to set your order in the best position (and according to your parameter).
So, in your example, CAT will recalculate price at 0.00000124 during recalculation routine.
But remember that Recalculation routine occurs every X Lookup (X Is Dynamic, you can set from the Ping-Pong parameter panel).
September 17, 2015, 06:11:08 PM
Yes it was me.
I'm taking a look in debug mode
I'm taking a look in debug mode
Jump to: