Mr Gee, what is bitcoin's use case in the current environment of kyc and crack downs on crypto exchanges? I'm all ears. And don't say some GD stupid bullshit about how it's a storage of value. Underneath my mattress is a better one. Fees are way to high and way to unstable to use as a currency. What. Is. The. Use. Case.
I have no obligation to answer your stupid-ass trolling interrogation that attempts to put some kind of burden on me to explain what bitcoin is to you, when you seem to not understand what value it has (especially when you are discounting store of value - that has a lot more to it than the fiat that you have under your mattress that are likely to depreciate in value in 100 years and be worth 1-2% of what they were worth when you put them there (if you are lucky).
If you believe that there is no value in having control over your money and a system that challenges the (lack of) sound money of all governments (that might even start out with good intentions but turn into fiscally irresponsible dweebs when they realize that they can print more and more and more money), and a system that has never previously existed, then you seem to NOT understand what is going on in terms of bitcoin's hashing power or the challenge (or disruption potential) that bitcoin is contributing to the scheme of monetary possibilities (including giving gold, silver and other pms a definite run for their money in terms of portability, divisibility and the practicality of use and ultimate non-inflation of the BTC supply beyond the original algorithm parameters - absent some kind of overwhelming consensus to change it.. which would likely not come easily.).
Why the fuck are there so many computers mining bitcoin?, someone knows something about the value of bitcoin if they are investing that much into securing it, no? Oh no. You, WinslowIII, are the smartest person in the room, and you seem to understand some kind of meaningful veto-ing power threat to bitcoin (aka kyc.. . or that exchanges closing or burdened out of existence would actually cause the death of bitcoin)
)
Your fees are too high proposition, or even any kind of claim that bitcoin processes transactions too slow are both non-substantiated talking points, and if you have proof about those claims, then the burden is on you. So far, as far as I have been able to tell, bitcoin continues to have a considerable amount of transactions that go on the blockchain, and there are second layer solutions that are optional to folks to use too (even though they are still in relatively early testing stages).
It seems to me that you have the burden to establish your dumbass nonsenical proposition that bitcoin does not have any use cases, because I continue to see growth and development and the expansion of its seven network effects (look up network effects discussed by Trace Mayer if you want to learn more about that angle of bitcoin's ongoing growth).
You don't have nothing, even though you spout off some dumbass conclusory interrogations that seem to presume the conclusions that you would like to believe to be true.. so in the end, if you don't believe bitcoin has any use case, then don't buy it and go out there and bet against it (by shorting, perhaps?). Good luck.
Oh no, you are too desperate for shorting bitcoin, and you would rather spread FUD based on wild unsubstantiated assertion, amirite, newbie troll/shill?