Topic: Bounties are STUPID - page 5. (Read 4894 times)
hahaha very funny, then create your own ico, dont make any assumptions about others doing ico and giving out 2℅ to their bounty participants.
The thing is, in crypto one can't get real hard consequences for spamming paid with bounties.
Each crypto team might say - hey, we just opened an invite contest and asked everyone to be honest,
not to post spam and not to use bots! So QUALIFIED promotion just gets drowned into oceans of spam and mindless reposts.
Each crypto team might say - hey, we just opened an invite contest and asked everyone to be honest,
not to post spam and not to use bots! So QUALIFIED promotion just gets drowned into oceans of spam and mindless reposts.
Bounties are in a way one of the cheapest way to advertise your ICO project.
Most of us in the bounty campaign also become ICO contributors. The advantage for us bounty hunters is that it lessens the cost of owning the token - e.g. if I contribute 9 eth, then I get 1 eth worth of tokens, that's like a 10% off due to bounty.
I mostly do signature campaign bounty, I realized that they offer more bounty for signature campaign because it already targets those people in the crypto space, where as facebook, linkedin, etc may not bring those viewers or readers into the ICO campaign. Seeing a signature multiple times being carried by so many people probably does have some subliminal effect and out of curiosity might entice bct readers to know more about the project and eventually join the ICO as well.
Most of us in the bounty campaign also become ICO contributors. The advantage for us bounty hunters is that it lessens the cost of owning the token - e.g. if I contribute 9 eth, then I get 1 eth worth of tokens, that's like a 10% off due to bounty.
I mostly do signature campaign bounty, I realized that they offer more bounty for signature campaign because it already targets those people in the crypto space, where as facebook, linkedin, etc may not bring those viewers or readers into the ICO campaign. Seeing a signature multiple times being carried by so many people probably does have some subliminal effect and out of curiosity might entice bct readers to know more about the project and eventually join the ICO as well.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
It's actually true specially for everyone who sells immediately after they receive their bounty rewards. It plummets the price of the token in the market by a significant margin and it's pretty baffling how true ICO investors could take this kind of price manipulation.
A project will not be many known if they don't have marketing team and a bounty hunter is part of it too. 2% only a little when we really see the detail of the allocation. Perhaps the biggest problem is when a lot of the cheaters and the project ended up with scam. But there still nothing wrong with bounty because of our mutual benefit.
all benefit like us, project TEAM, investors and all involved if managed properly. we also work as we often do, bounty hunters make advertisements for projects so that many people who know and projects get more famous.
What defines a quality post? This is subjective judgment once the grammar is correct and the sentence conveys the opinion of the writer. How can you accuse bounty hunters for selling off coins right after receiving them? This is not true because 1% to 2% allocation for bounties cannot significantly contribute the dumping of a coin. Sell offs comes from the team and investors who hold large percentage of the entire tokens, trust me.
Nope disagree we all know there are so many bounty scamms, participating in bounty campaign base on my experience is profitable, depend how you can choose good bounty project.
Not really. It doesn't matter how good the idea of the project, if the market situation is similar as we're seeing now the chance to succeed is extremely small.
A project will not be many known if they don't have marketing team and a bounty hunter is part of it too. 2% only a little when we really see the detail of the allocation. Perhaps the biggest problem is when a lot of the cheaters and the project ended up with scam. But there still nothing wrong with bounty because of our mutual benefit.
Nope disagree we all know there are so many bounty scamms, participating in bounty campaign base on my experience is profitable, depend how you can choose good bounty project.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
I agree with your opinion! A lot of bounties today that gives a nut for their participants. Most of them are giving us a cent only because they say that it is a gift. I joined for more than 6 months but I only received few tokens on my wallet. They deceived every tokens we earn. Now, I gradually lose my excitement in participating bounty programs due to the small distribution of tokens and long waiting for earnings.Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
I agree with your opinion! A lot of bounties today that gives a nut for their participants. Most of them are giving us a cent only because they say that it is a gift. I joined for more than 6 months but I only received few tokens on my wallet. They deceived every tokens we earn. Now, I gradually lose my excitement in participating bounty programs due to the small distribution of tokens and long waiting for earnings. Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
lol, you are funny. you`d never have an ICO or it will be 100% failed. What is your marketing plan? How to make a community? how to gain some HYPE and attention?
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Yes you might be correct about it. Yet ICOs are sometimes a failure and would probably give you feelings of anger towards it. They cannot blame you for your actions because they might have not given you justice. So maybe you hate bounties? And or maybe 2% was never enough for you! Or you hate bounty hunters because you have problems with them. Maybe you can expound more of your feelings so that the community can really understand you very well. Thanks.
yes, it is like ignorance when an ico gives a little reward to those who want to cooperate with the Ico project itself. but in my opinion an ico definitely has a purpose that is useful for their own ico project when an ico provides bounty programs to people. an ico manager, surely someone who is very intelligent and has thought positively and negatively for all programs that are run by an ico. there must be a very profitable goal for an ico, when ico opens a bounty program. and what is clear is that ico is known by many people and accepted in the market.
Are you also hunting for bounties? if so, don't say stupid to the bounty.
Are you also hunting for bounties? if so, don't say stupid to the bounty.
I disagree with you. bounty brings a lot of useful to the project and because of this, the project can collect more money
Looking what kind of generosity. I personally find some species useless. For example - social networks. due to the fact that there are a lot of multi-accounts with stitched subscriptions, this type of advertising becomes poor quality.
Maybe you have been scammed many times before that is why the change of mind, I have been scammed too but still want to go because we are the only ones who can accept this kind of works where you will get paid for a token that is just I owed you on the start of its inception.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
2 percent of the total bounty accumulation is not that really small. It can really provide good profit in forms of token. Though not all the members of the bounty are following the rules, the project is still advertised no matter what.
in 2017, the author did not think so and actively took part in subscription campaigns. I wonder what made him change his mind ...
Bounty is needed for the development of projects. But the trouble is that we are not fighting with fakes. This is for us 2% is not enough, because there are a lot of scammers, and for the project it is a lot of money.
Bounty is needed for the development of projects. But the trouble is that we are not fighting with fakes. This is for us 2% is not enough, because there are a lot of scammers, and for the project it is a lot of money.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
maybe now what you are saying is true but I still have strong hopes and beliefs going forward the gift with ico will be profitable Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
So how they are going to promote their ICO they will have to spend thousands of dollars out of their pocket just to see their ICO in facebook and other social media account, they can opted to advertise here but they must pay right away forum administrator will not accept credits and with your own token.
Jump to: