Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 22. (Read 10499 times)
When you see that there are many participants in a bounty campaign like facebook and twitter, it is a good sign that the ico bounty campaign you are joining with is a hype one. If the bounty allocation for facebook and twitter is so low, and no control in many participants, then you have no choice but to endure it. Next time, its best to join a bounty campaign that sets max allocation to bounty hunters in order for you to get more and more bounty campaign rewards.
It's hard time now for bounty-hunters. So many people try bounty and ICO-projects pay less every months. But you can still earn good money if you will choice good bounty/project.
I think it's impossible to realize.
Participants in bounty companies are really very many, but ICO who spend bounty is also very much.
Therefore, I am sure that eventually everything will normalize by itself.
Nothing to worry about.
Participants in bounty companies are really very many, but ICO who spend bounty is also very much.
Therefore, I am sure that eventually everything will normalize by itself.
Nothing to worry about.
More participants joins bounty campaign because those rewards too high and everyone want it. Lots of programs have hard rules and most of people can't follow those rules and we still have high paying with those campaign. So i think we don't need to care about number of participants and we just need to follow the rules to get high rewards.
Yes, the popularity of bounty is growing, a simple way to make good money. I now own 3 months ago did not participate in the campaigns and didn't know about them
My opinion is to divide the bounty campaign into sublevels, depending on the rank on the forum. And newcomers do not give the right to participate.
Very happy if you can join bounty. But almost all the requirements to participate bounty is minimal junior member. Too bad I'm still a newbie. I can not join it. still waiting. 
In general, I agree that the bounty must accept a limited number of participants so that those who take part can get a good profit, and not a trifle because of the large crowd.
Although, now, due to the fact that bitcoin is extremely unstable, many participants have stopped dealing with bounty companies.
Although, now, due to the fact that bitcoin is extremely unstable, many participants have stopped dealing with bounty companies.
we can not deny the development of the world, especially on bitcoin world, we can not deny and the more who knows the existence of bitcoin, the more newcomers in this crypto world, in fact we have to share with others, fortune in the hands of God, we must be able to accept reality happened
Yes, it is more and more participants in Bounty but more and more ICOs starting as well. Should not be afraid of
competition as You can attend multi Facebook, Twitter campaigns. In Signature campaigns You can wear only one
signature at the same time, this is why You have to make a good research and selection to make sure to participate
in the profitable ones.
Now Bounty hunting not so profitable as year ago, but still profitable and it is reason why we have new Bounty hunters every week. I think that bounty campaigns still have effective way for ICO promotion, because real costs around zero.
many participants in the bounty campaign I think is a natural thing, see now ico enthusiasts more and more, especially if in social media campaigns such as facebook and twitter, both are easy for the participants but different if in the signature campaign, so if you want the reward much better off signing campaigns alone.
Bounty and participation are not so confusion I think so.Its so easy on my way.If its bother with any project restrict with participation limit. Everything will be solved.
I advise you to spend time looking for a prospective bounty with few participants. So you can get a good profit.
All forum users are searching for such prospective bounty which has not much participants, so finally we have projects with 300+ participants in signature campaigns only
In such conditions fewer count of members doesn't mean higher profit 
I think just conditions should be stricter
Participants are exactly the same as before.Now significantly added people but and bounty projects, too,.The main thing is not to start work on platfarmah where 5tis and more people.There certainly money is not who will not see!
And do not say it. The bounty is now paying a penny, which is not enough to pay for transactions on the transfer of tokens on the exchange. You need to start with investments in promising projects.
We are just in early days of Bounties. Still not much people know about bounties. From companies point of view they want more bounty hunters in their projects. More participants means more reachout of the bounty with more investors with much rate of success into ICO. Some day the Bounties will be regulated & have more profit.
although more and more bounty participants I think it has become a trend in this forum, and more and more bounty hunters who break the rules in various bounty and it makes me a little annoyed 
I agree, there are a lot of people involved in Bounty campaigns now. Of course, this is good for developers, but bad for the participants. I think that if impose restrictions, then only on the number of followers in social networks or on the rank
Yes,nowadays people are very attracted with bounty and morwvwe people does facebook and twitter bounty.
it is a success of crypto currency but honestly saying i am not happy with because as much as people are joining to the facebook and twitter campaign benifit amount will become less.
And for that mamy people are not getting coin from bounty..but over all everything..bounty is the better than any other coin earning option.
it is a success of crypto currency but honestly saying i am not happy with because as much as people are joining to the facebook and twitter campaign benifit amount will become less.
And for that mamy people are not getting coin from bounty..but over all everything..bounty is the better than any other coin earning option.
Jump to: