Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 47. (Read 10495 times)
A large number of participants is not such a terrible problem. Much worse is that projects do not pay money to their bounty hunters. This is a much bigger problem.
I think that ICO projects will not limit the number of participants. Why should they? The number of participants will work according to market rules. Once this task is unattractive, the amount will be reduced
agree that a lot, but many want to get coins without investing finance, but this is not much in relation to the global economy as a whole, while we use the fact that there are so many people yet)
at the moment nothing can be done about it, but in any case, you can make some money on this system and this is good, for some people this is the main income
Yes, I also noticed that recently there are a lot of participants in the projects. It is usually very difficult to get into a normal project because many people try to get there.
I agree there have been too many participants lately. Join the bounty. See that enough people already involved, think about how many will get, I think, "enough." And in the morning there are already twice as many participants.
Naturally, the complexity of the work, especially profitable, becomes more complicated with time. New people must come, but the pool of work expands. I do not see anything terrible in this. Just have to choose more vainly.
I think you're just being greedy. You don't want to work anymore. Any work with time becomes more complicated. Yes, there are new members, but there is more work. Learn how to pick places. And not go where all the river flows.
I like it every time there's a new bounty campaign that has a great project with the famous team member of it because the first thing that comes to my mind is that this ICO will surely be successful in the future. Indeed, that as long as there are more participants in a bounty campaign. That's the strength of the Bounty program. Bounty is suitable for those who earn monthly income and earn extra income in Crypto
My opinion is that this is simply a complete lack of forethought by bounty managers and project teams. Sometimes I write serious, good quality articles, but only for campaigns that aren't flooded with too many shit articles diluting the stakes. As you can guess, I rarely write articles. If I see max stakes awarded to some 300 word foreign language post on SteemIt, you can be assured I'm not promoting that ICO. They can keep that content, and best of luck to them with it.
It seems to me that after the system of merits was introduced at the forum, the problem of a large number of participants is partially solved.
Its fine if the participants today of bounty campaigns are too many because it only means that the campaign is highly trusted so we can still believe that there will be ico's who are going to be successful in the future...
I agree that bounties gathering to many participants now . This make most part of social media bounties not attractive to spend our time on it , because 1-3 months of work usually bring us 5-50 $ per campaign , which is not a big money at all for a most part of people . But there are some poor countries , where these is a decent money and social media bounties are full of people from those places . They will work even if they will earn only a few bucks per campaign , because it is still a good money for them . So , nothing strange that we have thouthands participants in bounties today and I think those numbers will only increase in the future 
I think bounty too many participants because bounty is a gift in the world of online games with one marketing strategy to provide market penetration as much as possible. Activities such as share and comment on social media accounts ICO organizers, writing articles on blogs, making videos, Bitcointalk, and so forth.We will get rewards in the form of token / coin crypto, which amount depends on what we follow.
Yes, there were many participants, but also campaigns became more! Signature campaign we choose one, can not participate in several, but in Twitter and Facebook more than 2000 participants in some campaigns! That's plenty!
I doubt that the ICO projects will limit participants of bounty. More and more people are learning about the bounty campaigns. increasing the number of participants is a simple inevitability.
Many beginners will not get a good profit and will leave. It is necessary to participate in a large number of campaigns to have income now.
Many beginners will not get a good profit and will leave. It is necessary to participate in a large number of campaigns to have income now.
Bounty with too many participants reduces the amount of your payout. Facebook,Twitter and telegram campaign has the most participants and I think signature campaign is different.
yeah you are correct it's too bad when we get a small reward .but nowadays bounty managers limit the participants to keep rewards high
Of course bounty campaigns are getting harder these days. Thousand participants. But its normally, cuz how much each member of the bounty will receive is not important for the campaign..
Today, there are really a lot of participants in bounty companies, sometimes it does not even make sense to take part in bounty companies, there are also problems with payments.
Jump to: