Topic: Bounty campaign - Lately waste of time and energy - page 3. (Read 1573 times)
I really agree with you ,, because some of the bounty of the campaign is a scam, and every bounty of the campaign recruits all members who still want to come always accepted even though bounty members have exceeded 1000 members, and the impasse is that the bet we get does not match what we do
Some really good project pay more and the bounties are paid in ETH. It is the scammy projects that pay less and have all the problems that OP have mentioned. No one is forced to promote those ICO, it is your own choice to promote it and take the risk. Just make wiser choice and ignore the scammy ICOs.
Yeah well, earning money on bounty campaigns is just a little better than counting on a faucet. Can't really expect that it's going to pay out big. You might get what you expected, but you also might not. Especially if the ICO doesn't go well.
I agree completely with the OP.
I've definitely noticed a direct correlation between how well a bounty campaign is organized/implemented AND the overall success of the ICO.
I've definitely noticed a direct correlation between how well a bounty campaign is organized/implemented AND the overall success of the ICO.
This is real talk and its really a waste of time if a certain ICO wont able to pay you out or if they pay they do only give amounts which is very small which isnt really worth for our time and effort. I would really suggest to limit the participants so that bounty distributions or partitions would really be sufficient and would really be worth it for their promoters unlike on dont having limits i can say its not really worth to join in.
Yup, it's true. Some of the campaign managers are also very sloppy, and are not that very organized. Some don't even use escrows so the payments are not trusted. I agree that bounty participants should be paid even when the project fails or when the payout for the token sale is not met. It is unfair for the participants who have exerted effort and wore their signatures for their campaign.
I guess that one should just learn and research on the ICO first before participating so that you don't waste your time and effort.
Once you hit a bad Project then expect you wont really got nothing or would possibly got pennies on all the efforts you do made on promoting them.I have experienced this thing and i can really compare the ico in the past and into the present.I would rather go back in the past because i remember the days which i do earn big amounts on promoting them unlike now,you will just earn the amount not worth on the hard work you done.
Lately, the vast majority of the ICO bounty campaign sucks and not worth your time to promote them.
What I found are the following from my own experience:
Some solutions should standardize the process of marketing the ICO.
My advice: Think twice before promoting an ICO, we are human and your valuable time should be spent on something worth it for the effort.
What I found are the following from my own experience:
- Poor managed campaign without transparent communication and delay.
- Many will not even reach the minimum payout, and you will receive nothing for your effort.
- They accept too many people and when they count the stakes, you receive a little reward not worth the time.
- Too many bugs and slow access to bounty websites.
Some solutions should standardize the process of marketing the ICO.
- Pay bounty participants in ETH or BTC even if the project fails with money protected before the bounty.
- All bounty campaign should migrate to web based solutions to simplify the stakes distribution.
- Limit the people on each campaign to give a good value of your time and energy.
My advice: Think twice before promoting an ICO, we are human and your valuable time should be spent on something worth it for the effort.
GIVE THIS MAN A COOKIE!
he basically listed out all the issue with the current bounty program.
Been promoting campaign that
ICO and not paid
ICO succeed and paid less than it should be
ICO succeed and bounty was ignored
Thanks for voicing out
This is real talk and its really a waste of time if a certain ICO wont able to pay you out or if they pay they do only give amounts which is very small which isnt really worth for our time and effort. I would really suggest to limit the participants so that bounty distributions or partitions would really be sufficient and would really be worth it for their promoters unlike on dont having limits i can say its not really worth to join in.
Yup, it's true. Some of the campaign managers are also very sloppy, and are not that very organized. Some don't even use escrows so the payments are not trusted. I agree that bounty participants should be paid even when the project fails or when the payout for the token sale is not met. It is unfair for the participants who have exerted effort and wore their signatures for their campaign.
I guess that one should just learn and research on the ICO first before participating so that you don't waste your time and effort.
I think you mean that dice ICOs which is a fraud in itself, you can't can't expect to get anything out of it
This is very bad to the whole system
For a small profit all of you keep saying to buy an altcoin, to invest on the project, even if the project is bad
For a small profit all of you keep saying to buy an altcoin, to invest on the project, even if the project is bad
Coindash operated their bounties very well, I think it's my good luck to join.But most of the time , I have to agree with you , plenty of ICO bounties are not worth participating.
Did you already get paid bounties? I haven't received any payment yet. 
Are you feeling stress due to the unsuccessful ico or you will get a low payment for your promotion? But i can say not at all. There are some previous campaign that has really worth with our effort such as bancor.
I got around 5k dollar for my payment to promos the project into the world.
I got around 5k dollar for my payment to promos the project into the world.
Coindash operated their bounties very well, I think it's my good luck to join.But most of the time , I have to agree with you , plenty of ICO bounties are not worth participating.
This is really the risk on joining Bounty campaigns which we wont really know which project do have potential to pay us up on good rates and whos not gonna pay after all the hard work we done and this thing is just really a normal thing as of now and it becomes more and more harder because there are lots of ICOs already which are popping out everywhere which its really very hard to choose up now a good project.
It all depends on the campaign itself, With a good & professional Campaign manager to start with campaign will make everything flow smoothly. As for payments its all gamble for bounty hunters same goes way with the investors, Bounty Hunters spends time and effort while investors spends money.
some projects distribute the token too late not as promised, some are scam, the token is worthless, just waste our time and energy, maybe the project are so many and more just dont have ANN in this forum
It really depends on the ICO itself. I agree with you that many ICO's these days have no good bounty program, some of them not even reaching the minimum cap. I participated in Indorse now. They are very well organized.
This is real talk and its really a waste of time if a certain ICO wont able to pay you out or if they pay they do only give amounts which is very small which isnt really worth for our time and effort. I would really suggest to limit the participants so that bounty distributions or partitions would really be sufficient and would really be worth it for their promoters unlike on dont having limits i can say its not really worth to join in.
it's very true, i sometimes also feel saturated and tired when working on Bounty and that pissed me off is not paid in accordance with our hard work, many bitcointalk users are popping up but there is no limit on the bitcoin hunters to join the campaign that makes the participants' payments very small. 
Lately, the vast majority of the ICO bounty campaign sucks and not worth your time to promote them.
What I found are the following from my own experience:
Some solutions should standardize the process of marketing the ICO.
My advice: Think twice before promoting an ICO, we are human and your valuable time should be spent on something worth it for the effort.
What I found are the following from my own experience:
- Poor managed campaign without transparent communication and delay.
- Many will not even reach the minimum payout, and you will receive nothing for your effort.
- They accept too many people and when they count the stakes, you receive a little reward not worth the time.
- Too many bugs and slow access to bounty websites.
Some solutions should standardize the process of marketing the ICO.
- Pay bounty participants in ETH or BTC even if the project fails with money protected before the bounty.
- All bounty campaign should migrate to web based solutions to simplify the stakes distribution.
- Limit the people on each campaign to give a good value of your time and energy.
My advice: Think twice before promoting an ICO, we are human and your valuable time should be spent on something worth it for the effort.
Jump to: