Interesting.
Holy cow. It seems the SHFL team simply picked what they liked and ran with it, there are fewer tabs and no mention of DAOs in the Shuffle whitepaper (yet). Hence it seems that the Shuffle whitepaper has fewer information than the Fullhouse whitepaper as well, so SHFL did only pick a few things from Fullhouse and kept quiet so far on this.
Based on your whitepaper, you've launched just this April of 2024 whilst for Shuffle, they've been launched in February of 2023. Since you are saying that they probably have picked a part of your whitepaper but it shouldn't be the opposite because they've launched earlier than you? and there's no way that both of you are sister company based on what you have said, so there's no connection between you and shuffle.
I believe it's not exactly plagiarized white paper but it's written in similar formatting and that's why I believe the one who wrote the white papers might be the same person. However, if both casinos have no issue with it then it won't be bothersome of someone else. Let's see what Shuffle says about this.
Exactly. What is interesting here is, maybe if any of them hired the writer of their whitepaper then that's the kind of work he had done and submitted to either of them and just did copied the format and modified it. The format are really likely so let's hear them out to get some clarity. Nice find OP.
