Author

Topic: [BOUNTY] GOLD Stablecoin – $200,000 - payouts in BTC, ETH, GOLD - page 265. (Read 173076 times)

member
Activity: 579
Merit: 13
Are you kind to your neighbor? Think it through
Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.
Cause, still on the calculation phase you already got the payment in august but still don't know whent they will sent the token  -_-. Oh god please read the rules, The most shit thing about bounty hunter always not reading the information bounty but they read/see about the reward.



"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue.
Now they try to solve it.

Honestly, since this bounty using stable token, most of the bounty hunter tries to cheating with copy-paste or using multiple accounts. You can check at these thread most newbie with 1-5 activity join the bounty. The team made a good decision to limited a newbie to join the campaign, i hope the team also make other rules "Maximum content you can create or limited the participant"

The problem only your statement, you accusing them can't afford to pay just because your result content got "Low Quality". I will understand your statement if your article was accepted but they not paid for your content. That's called can't afford to pay.

Chaw, Ended the conversation. I bit lazy to continue argue with someone who can't read the rules.


I also see this thread, many newbies who join in low quality content, this is very suspicious of a new account to be made directly join this campaign,

Only those who enter the spreadsheet are quality content and will pay on October 10-11.


I think it’s not a must you make a contribution.
On what grounds where those blogs termed low quality ?

Just ignore or walk past
member
Activity: 569
Merit: 88
Credibility: 999
Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.
Cause, still on the calculation phase you already got the payment in august but still don't know whent they will sent the token  -_-. Oh god please read the rules, The most shit thing about bounty hunter always not reading the information bounty but they read/see about the reward.



"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue.
Now they try to solve it.

Honestly, since this bounty using stable token, most of the bounty hunter tries to cheating with copy-paste or using multiple accounts. You can check at these thread most newbie with 1-5 activity join the bounty. The team made a good decision to limited a newbie to join the campaign, i hope the team also make other rules "Maximum content you can create or limited the participant"

The problem only your statement, you accusing them can't afford to pay just because your result content got "Low Quality". I will understand your statement if your article was accepted but they not paid for your content. That's called can't afford to pay.

Chaw, Ended the conversation. I bit lazy to continue argue with someone who can't read the rules.


I also see this thread, many newbies who join in low quality content, this is very suspicious of a new account to be made directly join this campaign,

Only those who enter the spreadsheet are quality content and will pay on October 10-11.

LMAO.... I know you were sent. I feel it running down my spine. However I'm not a newbie. I've heard the newbie word a lot...... Smiles

Peace ✌
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 284
Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.
Cause, still on the calculation phase you already got the payment in august but still don't know whent they will sent the token  -_-. Oh god please read the rules, The most shit thing about bounty hunter always not reading the information bounty but they read/see about the reward.



"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue.
Now they try to solve it.

Honestly, since this bounty using stable token, most of the bounty hunter tries to cheating with copy-paste or using multiple accounts. You can check at these thread most newbie with 1-5 activity join the bounty. The team made a good decision to limited a newbie to join the campaign, i hope the team also make other rules "Maximum content you can create or limited the participant"

The problem only your statement, you accusing them can't afford to pay just because your result content got "Low Quality". I will understand your statement if your article was accepted but they not paid for your content. That's called can't afford to pay.

Chaw, Ended the conversation. I bit lazy to continue argue with someone who can't read the rules.


I also see this thread, many newbies who join in low quality content, this is very suspicious of a new account to be made directly join this campaign,

Only those who enter the spreadsheet are quality content and will pay on October 10-11.
newbie
Activity: 518
Merit: 0
member
Activity: 569
Merit: 88
Credibility: 999
Dear Bounty participants,

Added information about the Content bounty campaign. Due to big amount of low-quality article we were forced to add only approved articles. If you did not find your article in the spreadsheet, then it has not been approved due to low quality, not unique, etc.

Twitter Campaign Week 3(30.09-06.10): https://forms.gle/11sTDLueNfJ1QQqv7
Report Link Week 3: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PbZr2BcvTrqMw3IQjRLeLMsypbfc9H7se5YakFPYDGI/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,
Support Team @ Digital Gold
https://gold.storage (https://gold.storage)




Please, do you mean to say all the articles on the spreadsheet now are all of the good quality?
This one for instance (https://medium.com/@gribovodasasha/gold-stablecoin-es-un-proyecto-que-vale-la-pena-considerar-la-inversi) can't be found but it has been rewarded.  I don't think your team really analysis the submissions well. 


If that article received a reward why didn't mine?   https://steemit.com/blockchain/@tissuesurgeon/digital-gold-blockchain-meets-the-gold-market

Exactly, they just reward like 10% of the entire submissions and label others low rate without even going through them. Bounty hunters are really suffering in this industry

Yea, there's a lot of suffering... And someone wakes up from bed to tell me that I don't read the rules. Honestly, I just don't want to argue because that dude doesn't even understand what's going on.... Or maybe he understands but won't let the truth come outta his mouth.

LMAO. No matter how bitter the truth I say is, K will support the Digital Gold platform with what I can (not just because of the bounty, but because I like the ideology of the platform).

jr. member
Activity: 107
Merit: 5
Dear Bounty participants,

Added information about the Content bounty campaign. Due to big amount of low-quality article we were forced to add only approved articles. If you did not find your article in the spreadsheet, then it has not been approved due to low quality, not unique, etc.

Twitter Campaign Week 3(30.09-06.10): https://forms.gle/11sTDLueNfJ1QQqv7
Report Link Week 3: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PbZr2BcvTrqMw3IQjRLeLMsypbfc9H7se5YakFPYDGI/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,
Support Team @ Digital Gold
https://gold.storage (https://gold.storage)




Please, do you mean to say all the articles on the spreadsheet now are all of the good quality?
This one for instance (https://medium.com/@gribovodasasha/gold-stablecoin-es-un-proyecto-que-vale-la-pena-considerar-la-inversi) can't be found but it has been rewarded.  I don't think your team really analysis the submissions well. 


If that article received a reward why didn't mine?   https://steemit.com/blockchain/@tissuesurgeon/digital-gold-blockchain-meets-the-gold-market

Exactly, they just reward like 10% of the entire submissions and label others low rate without even going through them. Bounty hunters are really suffering in this industry
copper member
Activity: 676
Merit: 181

How do I contact the telegram promotion campaign? And there is no reward spread sheet on telegram promotion

Dear sieunhan321pro,

Please contact directly to the PM and we will discuss everything.

Regards,
Support Team @ Digital Gold
https://gold.storage (https://gold.storage)
full member
Activity: 776
Merit: 146
#Authentication Post
Type of campaign: Content
Bitcointalk Username: cyberdg
Article link : https://steemit.com/gold/@cyberjz/digital-gold-stablecoin-fully-backed-by-gold-2
Telegram username: @cyberdg
ERC20 wallet address: 0x225478Ce2388caCD4DB039c0DC6c61AB2E066F89

Excuse me sir, please recheck again for my submission. Because that post doesn't appear on the spreadsheet
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.
Cause, still on the calculation phase you already got the payment in august but still don't know whent they will sent the token  -_-. Oh god please read the rules, The most shit thing about bounty hunter always not reading the information bounty but they read/see about the reward.



"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue.
Now they try to solve it.

Honestly, since this bounty using stable token, most of the bounty hunter tries to cheating with copy-paste or using multiple accounts. You can check at these thread most newbie with 1-5 activity join the bounty. The team made a good decision to limited a newbie to join the campaign, i hope the team also make other rules "Maximum content you can create or limited the participant"

The problem only your statement, you accusing them can't afford to pay just because your result content got "Low Quality". I will understand your statement if your article was accepted but they not paid for your content. That's called can't afford to pay.

Chaw, Ended the conversation. I bit lazy to continue argue with someone who can't read the rules.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 255
#Proof of authentication
Campaign: Twitter
Bitcointalk Username: sayaya17
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sayaya17-924739
Twitter profile URL: https://twitter.com/ayanishop1
member
Activity: 569
Merit: 88
Credibility: 999
-snip-
The company paid them with their own quality content, If the content was marked as "Low Quality" then they will pay for that rate. The shit thing i see, the participant was not really satisfying about the review content from the team they marked the content as "Low Quality" after getting a payment they deleted the content. It means they just like scammed the team.

Checked the spreadsheet, not everyone got "Low Quality" . Marked them as "Low Quality" and they still get the payment, it's mean the team still respect about the user. Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020. The budget divided to a few campaigns, they also don't want the budget out of the fund for the content campaign until the bounty was finished.

Do you want a big payment? Then join the signature campaign if you also care about the "Quality", As far i know the selection for the signature campaign was really strict. They only accepted a quality user.

Quote
Just like i was said "If you don't really satisfy from the team decisioun" you can leave/skip the bounty.

Quote
The exact amount will depend on the originality of the content, the number of views and comments, and the size of the website's audience.
Don't forget about this, don't just talk about the content cause the review not always based on the content.

Nna men! 😅
"after getting a payment they deleted the content."

Note: no one has been paid yet.

"Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020"

Now you're talking!!! This is the issue. Thanks for politely telling everyone. That's all the bounty hunters wanted to hear 🤷‍♂.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
-snip-
The company paid them with their own quality content, If the content was marked as "Low Quality" then they will pay for that rate. The shit thing i see, the participant was not really satisfying about the review content from the team they marked the content as "Low Quality" after getting a payment they deleted the content. It means they just like scammed the team.

Checked the spreadsheet, not everyone got "Low Quality" . Marked them as "Low Quality" and they still get the payment, it's mean the team still respect about the user. Also, you should know since the content doesn't have a maximum participant they need to maintain the budget carefully cause the bounty running until 2020. The budget divided to a few campaigns, they also don't want the budget out of the fund for the content campaign until the bounty was finished.

Do you want a big payment? Then join the signature campaign if you also care about the "Quality", As far i know the selection for the signature campaign was really strict. They only accepted a quality user.

Quote
Just like i was said "If you don't really satisfy from the team decisioun" you can leave/skip the bounty.

Quote
The exact amount will depend on the originality of the content, the number of views and comments, and the size of the website's audience.
Don't forget about this, don't just talk about the content cause the review not always based on the content.
member
Activity: 569
Merit: 88
Credibility: 999
-snip-
The quality not always about the content, most of the content campaigns have some a few different aspects to determine the quality. It could be :
  • The unique content
  • The relevant topic between the project
  • The viewer reaction ( View, Comment, etc)

If you make good content but nobody watch/reading the content, then the content not really can't bring a benefit for the project. Let's see about your video, your video was a screen recording its just a reading website from the website information. Also if you see from the view/comment its was pretty low. Got a low quality was really enough, at least you got some payment for your own work.

I don't know what wrong with these people. I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content, that's how are you doing business? To rate your article it's based on other people review not from you, Of course, if you rate your own you will rete the content as good quality.

How about this....will u say this is also low quality

https://steemit.com/digital/@chucho40/digital-gold

Pls review...pls

Some part of your content was copy-paste from other sources, here the original : https://bebusinessed.com/history/the-history-of-gold/

Your entry should be rejected.

The funny things, they said the team was cant afford to pay the participant. In the past 2 months where are you?, they make a payment was really smooth also you can directly exchange the token to major crypto. Another campaign was paying by a shit token and need to wait a few months to get listed at the exchange, nobody force you to join the bounty if you feels the reward was pretty small then leave it.

"I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content"

LMAO! With all due respect, why didn't they complain last month? Why this month? 🤔. BTW, don't blame them if they delete their content 🤷‍♂. If the company can't pay them then the company shouldn't bother about the content. Ba no be quality? Them delete am na 🤷‍♂ lol.

Peace ✌
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
-snip-
The quality not always about the content, most of the content campaigns have some a few different aspects to determine the quality. It could be :
  • The unique content
  • The relevant topic between the project
  • The viewer reaction ( View, Comment, etc)

If you make good content but nobody watch/reading the content, then the content not really can't bring a benefit for the project. Let's see about your video, your video was a screen recording its just a reading website from the website information. Also if you see from the view/comment its was pretty low. Got a low quality was really enough, at least you got some payment for your own work.

I don't know what wrong with these people. I see some people not really satisfying about the reward and deleted the content, that's how are you doing business? To rate your article it's based on other people review not from you, Of course, if you rate your own you will rete the content as good quality.

How about this....will u say this is also low quality

https://steemit.com/digital/@chucho40/digital-gold

Pls review...pls

Some part of your content was copy-paste from other sources, here the original : https://bebusinessed.com/history/the-history-of-gold/

Your entry should be rejected.

The funny things, they said the team was cant afford to pay the participant. In the past 2 months where are you?, they make a payment was really smooth also you can directly exchange the token to major crypto. Another campaign was paying by a shit token and need to wait a few months to get listed at the exchange, nobody force you to join the bounty if you feels the reward was pretty small then leave it.
Jump to: