Well considering there aren't many bounty hunters that joined in Project A, making the stakes given mostly to that particular bh and when they dump it would just have a minimal effect.
There are breakdowns of the allocation in threads of the bounty and from what I remember, bounties are just fraction of the whole allocation, so if there would be a massive dump from bounty hunters then there would just be small to minimal effect to the price.
Topic: Bounty hunters aren't responsible for dumps (Read 1454 times)
You can solve this problem pretty easy by locking tokens for a defined period of time. For example every month 10% of earned tokens become unlocked and it reduces the selling pressure done by bounty hunters.
if you apply this method it will only give a loss because the assets in the form of cryptocurrency that you have if stored in an exchange or stored anywhere will never be able to provide a guaranteed profit because the cryptocurrency price movements will never be known to go up or down even bitcoin too like that. legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You can solve this problem pretty easy by locking tokens for a defined period of time. For example every month 10% of earned tokens become unlocked and it reduces the selling pressure done by bounty hunters.
it doesn't solve the problem if the project isn't really developed. honestly, I've seen a lot of projects that are really broken because of something like this. it even creates a dump price for each token distribution. however, the best way to avoid this is to attract lots of users, and that is the job of the developer. however, the bounty hunter is not entirely wrong in this matter, because I feel this is a common thing, so developers must think of strategies to avoid dumps caused by bounty hunter sales. 
You can solve this problem pretty easy by locking tokens for a defined period of time. For example every month 10% of earned tokens become unlocked and it reduces the selling pressure done by bounty hunters.
I also think so they never give more than 5% prizes and the bounty hunters also do not sell them directly simultaneously, so if prices go down when listing maybe the project is not good or investors sell most of their coins.
It's even hard to see bounty campaigns that gives up to 5% of their max supply nowadays, Cartesi project only gives 0.10% and so many other bounties too, honestly I haven't joined about with 1% max supply this year so far, its a Stupid claim if teams are insisting that bounty hunters are responsible for value drop.
Whales are responsible for dumps as usual. If bounty hunter so rich that we can name him responsible
Yes, I agree that the allocation that is given to bounty hunters is very low but still even though there's a 1 bounty hunter who dumps a token, it is still had to do with the project. The team and investor ofcourse must also be a fault of it because they have a big amount of token and also they didn't manage the platform right for the sake of the token. There are lots of people who attracts by the price to earn in the project than the good content of the project so still no use for the greed of people.
I also think so they never give more than 5% prizes and the bounty hunters also do not sell them directly simultaneously, so if prices go down when listing maybe the project is not good or investors sell most of their coins.
Yes, i can add here about HY token that is given to bounty hunter in every week but i never seen it goes below to 3$ before ICO payments. When june-2 ICO token given its price come to below 1$ even 0.5$ also though its ICO price 2$. So how we can say bounty hunters are dumpers? i think its fully depends on ICO investors.
thanks.
Bounty hunters are not right one to be blame in the price of dumping in the market.
I don't believe on this a piece of shit. Please excuse me for the terms I had bestowed but I am just
stating the fact only. Before bounty hunters can sell their coin rewards the price of the coins
they have is usually already dumped if they can able to trade their coins in the exchange that's the
common thing happened actually.
I don't believe on this a piece of shit. Please excuse me for the terms I had bestowed but I am just
stating the fact only. Before bounty hunters can sell their coin rewards the price of the coins
they have is usually already dumped if they can able to trade their coins in the exchange that's the
common thing happened actually.
Point 1.
Many bounty hunters hold tokens and coins they earn from bounties, not all of them are dumpers,
Not all of them are dumpers I agree but most of them are joining the bounty campaign for the sake of profit so they are playing a big role too in dumping the token aside from the investors and the team itself who are dumping most of the tokens.Many bounty hunters hold tokens and coins they earn from bounties, not all of them are dumpers,
Point 2.
and it's ridiculous if a project dumps because of bounties and airdrops promotions that's suppose to drive in many investors for them
These kind of promotions will surely help the project but the dumping of the bounty hunters is inevitable. They aren't the "ONLY" responsible for the dumps but also the investors and the team too.and it's ridiculous if a project dumps because of bounties and airdrops promotions that's suppose to drive in many investors for them
Point 3.
Bounties allocations are not even up to 1% of the projects max allocations, the most projects I've seen only gives out 0.1% and some even gives out only 0.01%
Yep I agree with this but they also play a role in dumping alongside with the investors and the team Bounties allocations are not even up to 1% of the projects max allocations, the most projects I've seen only gives out 0.1% and some even gives out only 0.01%
.Overall, bounty hunters aren't the "ONLY" one who is responsible for the dumping of the token but also the team and the investors. Lets face it that most of them are just investing or joining just because of the profit and not because of the technology behind the project itself. Yes there are some who choose to hold the token they got but it is a huge risk to them because I don't see any project that didn't dump as they are getting listed on an exchange.
Bounty hunters do dump there tokens after bounty ends but the bounty allocations is not enough to drag down the value of the token unless
1. The token is listed on bad exchange
2. The exchange has very low volume
3. The token itself is not good enough and people aren't buying
That's right, if the token is listed on a good exchange and has a high volume, of course the bounty will have no effect at all. 1. The token is listed on bad exchange
2. The exchange has very low volume
3. The token itself is not good enough and people aren't buying
I should say even if all bounty hunters sell their tokens, it would not affect the price as the token pool is 5, 3, or even less percentage of total token supply. Its the early, private investors or team who are responsible for price dump.
I think everyone knows this already, and even developers just chose not to refute the claims, Bounty hunters were never responsible for dumps in any instances. It is media pushed narratives to cause bad influences to bounty hunters.
bounty hunters are people who promote projects to attract investors, so if some people consider prize hunters to be dumper, that is not true, especially considering that the allocation given is only 1-5%.
Bounty hunters do dump there tokens after bounty ends but the bounty allocations is not enough to drag down the value of the token unless
1. The token is listed on bad exchange
2. The exchange has very low volume
3. The token itself is not good enough and people aren't buying
1. The token is listed on bad exchange
2. The exchange has very low volume
3. The token itself is not good enough and people aren't buying
The one that caused dumping is usually the early investor that got bonuses, most of the bounty hunters also sell their coins when the coin being listed,but the portion is too small to cause dumping, but the funny thing is most of the people believe that bounty hunters that caused the price to fall down
Here are points that bounty hunters aren't responsible for major dumps happening to bounty projects
Point 1.
Many bounty hunters hold tokens and coins they earn from bounties, not all of them are dumpers,
Point 2.
and it's ridiculous if a project dumps because of bounties and airdrops promotions that's suppose to drive in many investors for them
Point 3.
Bounties allocations are not even up to 1% of the projects max allocations, the most projects I've seen only gives out 0.1% and some even gives out only 0.01%
Point 4.
New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
Point 1.
Many bounty hunters hold tokens and coins they earn from bounties, not all of them are dumpers,
Point 2.
and it's ridiculous if a project dumps because of bounties and airdrops promotions that's suppose to drive in many investors for them
Point 3.
Bounties allocations are not even up to 1% of the projects max allocations, the most projects I've seen only gives out 0.1% and some even gives out only 0.01%
Point 4.
New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
Yes bounty hunters only have the small portion of the coin that are circulating on the market.
Sometimes the creator of the project are involve in a dump where they can manipulate the price and earn from it. But its not about being dump . Because the mindset of bpunty hunters now is to sell their coin asap before it turn into a shit coin
I don't think that was caused by a bounty hunter. I think it happens because someone, an investor, a project team, or those who have a large number of project tokens and then sell them.
There was a lot of factors that can cause the dump for the price of the token. Low liquidity, big bonus, low interest, the bad result of development progress and the hunters can't always be the reason to be blamed when the price is going down. So many scam projects have become scam projects too. 
--
New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
This is not a problem if there are no more discounts for sales in the next phase. Early investors should get a good appreciation because they want to trust the project, even though the progress is not yet visible.New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
The problem is that discounts are continually given regardless of the long-term effects. If there is a dump, the bounty hunter is often blamed. Though investors also have the same opportunity. Isn't everyone entitled to benefit from the hard work and effort that has been done?
--
New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
This is not a problem if there are no more discounts for sales in the next phase. Early investors should get a good appreciation because they want to trust the project, even though the progress is not yet visible.New projects go around giving too good discounts for early investors, an ICO price of 0.01$ turn to 0.005$ for early investors, what are they thinking? The moment this hits exchange and price starts at 0.02$ they will surely dump 💯
The problem is that discounts are continually given regardless of the long-term effects. If there is a dump, the bounty hunter is often blamed. Though investors also have the same opportunity. Isn't everyone entitled to benefit from the hard work and effort that has been done?
I don't think that was caused by a bounty hunter. I think it happens because someone, an investor, a project team, or those who have a large number of project tokens and then sell them.
Jump to: