Topic: Bounty hunters complains and they listens - page 8. (Read 1366 times)
I have participated in 2 bounties managed by Bounty Detective and both bounties were quite good, I received their payment and got the results, yes even though the results were small, because there were too many participants they received I hope they could limit the participants and for Bubbalex I just joined the bounty they manage and haven't known enough about Bubbalex
I would not be in a hurry to say that these two managers are part of the best managers so far.
We await whether their project is successful and the bounty hunter is worth it.
We await whether their project is successful and the bounty hunter is worth it.
I think the OP has only accessed them based on the experiences he had with the projects they managed in the past and have ended and truly speaking, these two managers or managing teams have done well. Although, that does not mean others are not doing good and there are upcoming managers who have a good relationship with hunters and are ready to listen to their complaints.
I would not be in a hurry to say that these two managers are part of the best managers so far.
We await whether their project is successful and the bounty hunter is worth it.
We await whether their project is successful and the bounty hunter is worth it.
Honestly, i believe you are right about the bounty detective and bubbablex bounty team, but i do feel that every bounty manager has a listening ear; it all depends on the approach of the bounty hunter; if bounty hunters can learn to respectfully table their concerns or complains to the group chat, tagging the bm, or the bm private message; there are good chances of been responded to and adhered.
After all, that is their job. To take care of their bounty participants.
So what they are doing is really just within their responsibility.
However, even if those BMs are really good at with their participants, it doesn't mean that every project they handle will be a success.
I bet most of those are in the alts section, in which, both sides don't know if the token or coin will gonna hit in exchanges with the price as advised.
So if you are a bounty hunter, you still need to do your part. Not only check the BM but the project in general.
These are excellent managers who have already gained their reputation on this forum and every newbie can safely participate in their bounty campaigns and not be afraid that he will not receive his rewards. but besides these managers, there are also a lot of good guys
Sometimes it's not all projects have already managed become a sucessfull project but these managers were always asking the hunters about any suggestion regarding for its own managtement. In this case i would say that everything is fine right now with those managers Many bounty managers don't like listening to what bounty hunters have in mind but this won't stop me from saying the name of two bounty managers that listens, they believe in fairness and good contribution of their bounty hunters
I am not following bounties for a very long time and if you think that these managers are the promoting the best projects i would like to see you list some of the projects they promoted and i would like to review those projects and the next time they promote something i will monitor and likely invest in them if i like the concept. 
-Snip-
Yes. I still believe there are still some bounty managers out there that have good listening ears for their bounty hunters. BM are also human and for sure if you have valid concern they will listen and discussed things in the right manners.
Sometimes bounty hunters should also learn how to communicate to their bounty hunters in a positive and respectful way so that they can also be respected in return.
There's always a good results when you deal with your concern in respectul ways and a calm conditions, everything
can be settled if you always have a listening ears not just a demanding approaches.
It's just a matter of good interaction between the bounty hunters and the bounty manager so that everyone's concern will be personally addressed.
Correct, both sides have their reasons and if hunters will talked professionally there's nothing to argue but instead a
helping solutions to discussed.
Honestly, i believe you are right about the bounty detective and bubbablex bounty team, but i do feel that every bounty manager has a listening ear; it all depends on the approach of the bounty hunter; if bounty hunters can learn to respectfully table their concerns or complains to the group chat, tagging the bm, or the bm private message; there are good chances of been responded to and adhered.
Yes. I still believe there are still some bounty managers out there that have good listening ears for their bounty hunters. Sometimes bounty hunters should also learn how to communicate to their bounty hunters in a positive and respectful way so that they can also be respected in return. It's just a matter of good interaction between the bounty hunters and the bounty manager so that everyone's concern will be personally addressed.they need to be friendly and listen to the feedback of others so that they can build a good reputation but i hope that they will carry that manner by the time that they are now succesful . i know some managers like that that changed alot after they became popular and succesful . talking to them in the right way is needed , no need for tagging because tagging is considered spam . just pm one message is enough and theyl see it as long as they foccus on thier jobs
Honestly, i believe you are right about the bounty detective and bubbablex bounty team, but i do feel that every bounty manager has a listening ear; it all depends on the approach of the bounty hunter; if bounty hunters can learn to respectfully table their concerns or complains to the group chat, tagging the bm, or the bm private message; there are good chances of been responded to and adhered.
Yes. I still believe there are still some bounty managers out there that have good listening ears for their bounty hunters. Sometimes bounty hunters should also learn how to communicate to their bounty hunters in a positive and respectful way so that they can also be respected in return. It's just a matter of good interaction between the bounty hunters and the bounty manager so that everyone's concern will be personally addressed.
Honestly, i believe you are right about the bounty detective and bubbablex bounty team, but i do feel that every bounty manager has a listening ear; it all depends on the approach of the bounty hunter; if bounty hunters can learn to respectfully table their concerns or complains to the group chat, tagging the bm, or the bm private message; there are good chances of been responded to and adhered.
I LIKE bubbalex alot and I believe he is one of the few good bounty manager in the space, but in the first place it was very ridiculous to negotiate such deal for bounty program, I do not understand why but good that he listen to people and renegotiate the deal
It's always good to escrow funds for Bounty, and some managers are really trying in that regard. Some managers never care about hunters after campaign ends, provided the host paid them for management. I had a situation whereby my details were on spreadsheet but I was omitted probably due to my reward. Transparency and fairness is all we need, God bless those managers who take their time to bring good projects and also to ensure hunters get rewarded.
The campaign what you wear in your signature behaved honestly. They wanted to prolong bounty campaign for few weeks, but they have heard voice of the bounty community and they distributed rewards to them before they launched the next round 
.
You talking about oikos bounty campaign? Yea I heard they did well but it all happens because bounty managers stood up for themselves, some even go extra mile and PM the CEO himself to make him see reasons why the bounty campaign should have two rounds and distribute the first round .
The campaign what you wear in your signature behaved honestly. They wanted to prolong bounty campaign for few weeks, but they have heard voice of the bounty community and they distributed rewards to them before they launched the next round .
Yes, I also hope that they will be fair, because the prior experience of distribution is usually done in conjunction with the next round of bounties. so let's see what will happen .
The campaign what you wear in your signature behaved honestly. They wanted to prolong bounty campaign for few weeks, but they have heard voice of the bounty community and they distributed rewards to them before they launched the next round .
. 
These are excellent managers who have already gained their reputation on this forum and every newbie can safely participate in their bounty campaigns and not be afraid that he will not receive his rewards. but besides these managers, there are also a lot of good guys
-snip-
Hmm really only 2 manager?About the distribution, it all depends on the agreement of the project and bounty manager will the bounty manager handle the distribution or not. Also, bounty hunter freely to join non-escrow bounty or not. Even with the guarantee token from Bounty Manager, not really make the project is successfully or not, I still not really any problem with escrow or nonescrow bounty. But for FIAT & BTC Campaign defiantly looking some escrow.
Also, not only these 2 managers have the due diligence process before taking the bounty. There a few popular bounty managers right now who not really publish so many bounty because they really care about the bounty. I see these one of the managers "Airdrop Detective" always have a bounty every week, so many projects using their service if we compare it with a popular bounty manager. But I'm still not really actively joined their bounty, because I feel their due diligence still not really good at all.
BTW I'm more like it, a bounty hunter cannot read an information who has been informed by bounty manager on the thread ~LOL. Almost 80% of bounty hunters always asking a question when the answer already on the thread.
I don't see any real reason to push the blame on bounty managers, if all they have presently are bounties that are listed on small exchanges like Probit it's always left for bounty hunters to make their choices, some will promote and some won't
You get the main idea but you can stop out those bounty hunters to have that kind of mindset on where they do always end up on blaming of BM if their expectations havent met.
I have already leaved the bounty hunting thing for years now and i can say that there are indeed good managers that do really listen into its participants but there are things
that are really out of their scope to be controlled on which is somewhat understandable and considerable.Its just wrong that they do always took the blame.
Bounty Detective did a great job in their work, they did a great job of managing them and responded quickly to the bounty hunter. But I don't really like the projects they manage because it's listed on small and bullshit exchanges in this market.
The work they do is very good and it is something they must always serve at every bounty they manage, about the projects they manage because they are listed on a small and crap exchange, it's more the task of the team and the project developer, because of that is not their job as a manager.Not all projects from bounty detective are listed on shit exchanges, they managed HEX bounty Campaign this year and the reward was mind-blowing, even ordinary telegram participants makes up to 150$ per hunters, look at ARCS which is trading on kucoin presently at 0.30$ with good volume.
Yes, indeed not all projects managed by Bounty Detective are bad projects, some projects are actually very good for all participants to follow even though the allocation is not too large, but the price of the token is very good.True, bounty detective still have some adjustments to do about few projects they introduced, kingcasino managed to sneaked pass them without detecting any flaws, simple flaws that are detectable by few members on this forum, no one is perfect but they aren't been careful
Don't just judge them on one project, but look at the average of the projects they manage, so that it will be a fair assessment for the Detective Bounty.
Bounty Detective did a great job in their work, they did a great job of managing them and responded quickly to the bounty hunter. But I don't really like the projects they manage because it's listed on small and bullshit exchanges in this market.
The work they do is very good and it is something they must always serve at every bounty they manage, about the projects they manage because they are listed on a small and crap exchange, it's more the task of the team and the project developer, because of that is not their job as a manager.Not all projects from bounty detective are listed on shit exchanges, they managed HEX bounty Campaign this year and the reward was mind-blowing, even ordinary telegram participants makes up to 150$ per hunters, look at ARCS which is trading on kucoin presently at 0.30$ with good volume.
Yes, indeed not all projects managed by Bounty Detective are bad projects, some projects are actually very good for all participants to follow even though the allocation is not too large, but the price of the token is very good.True, bounty detective still have some adjustments to do about few projects they introduced, kingcasino managed to sneaked pass them without detecting any flaws, simple flaws that are detectable by few members on this forum, no one is perfect but they aren't been careful
Don't just judge them on one project, but look at the average of the projects they manage, so that it will be a fair assessment for the Detective Bounty.
Jump to: