Topic: [BOUNTY] [ICO]🔶 Spectre.ai (SPEC) 🔶: Speculative Tokenized Trading Exchange🔶 - page 42. (Read 58263 times)

Good news everyone! As you may know, a massive bug distorted our first twitter campaign analyze. Some users got much more retweets/likes counts that they should have, so it was unfair for other participants. But we fixed it!

Thus, first stakes distribution tab has been updated.

The same rule always applies: don't ask me for a recount, I will not do it.

Second twitter campaign stakes distribution will occur very soon! Thanks for your patience everyone!

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: CllickerQluicker
Forum rank: Full member
Posts count: 132 (including your registration post)
ETH address: 0x55dde95c9023670059314d7906A8018984510538

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: u9y42
Forum rank: Legendary
Posts count:  2960
ETH address: 0x9936f714e754601971cafd0f3fd7ab2a9fd1c8f3

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: barista1992
Forum rank: Full Member
Posts count:  297
ETH address: 0xA95510dD3Da83a3d3225445b67Ca05D8fAD80E99

Hello Sylon?, I wanted to ask why you did not get my 5 posts on Saturday?

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: bagera
Forum rank: Full Member
Posts count:  199
ETH address: 0xCB4CC2526976Fe8263D010e7D6Cb0395DC0FD68b

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: voskobojn
Forum rank: Hero Member
Posts count:  (including your registration post) 1598
ETH address: 0x49753a4Fb0326dDc60D0Aac0852c97358A7c7b60

Can you send me the link of telegram chat please. I cannot  join by button "join group". Thank you!

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: cryptoup
Forum rank:  Full Member
Posts count: 122
ETH address: 0xDb1D9Eb8192bad684D64583f07842c77C9C73AC2

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: abibliev
Forum rank: Full member
Posts count:  (including your registration post) 145
ETH address: 0xDF727C54bc1dAdBa23B3AbBe2794b655Ae393476

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: Harriti
Forum rank: Full Member
Posts count:  200
ETH address: 0xBAF2dF7F5eeE97BDB321c9E5E04F83b1181c314a

You won't be paid.

Dude, wth you did on here? PM sylon.

Dev and sylon have said they have calculated enough to cover all participants bounty.

How about limited the participant?

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: hangar18
Forum rank: Hero Member
Posts count: 519
ETH address: 0x51Be3e527E787B756F69623A0f3c7b9084885cEf

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: yulionoo
Forum rank:  Full Member
Posts count: 200
ETH address: 0xd4BEE1FFB06161246Aa07AB68BDDAC7184e29bF9

Too many participant on this campaign, I think it is a good campaign so thats why many interested to participated on it.

Hello Mr. Sylon.
In the Signatures campaign already registered too many participants, the tokens allocated are not enough to pay everyone a reward.
How can you all pay a reward?

edit
Not correctly understood where to write the question.
Question to Sylon is redirected to PM

Hello Mr. Sylon.
I want to address you on behalf of the whole bounty community, not only Spectre, but also others. I'm sure that everything will support me on this issue.

In many social Twitter campaigns you follow, there are a lot of abusive accounts. These people make spam on their wall and get 3-4-5 or more times, more than other hardworking members of the campaign bounty. I understand that there are no restrictions on the number of postings in the rules. But when I went to the accounts of some of the participants, I was just shocked. Many completely spit on the very logic of the news, people retweet in the reverse order, from the new news to the old. Someone does 10 to 20 retweets at a time. Some people generally do more than 100 reposts at a time. Is this normal, so it should be? Is this a good advertisement? I think no. Other people are likely to just begin to enrage to see so many posts in their tape. If they want to know other news of the project, they will just open and look. To check it is quite simple, we just filter the spreadsheets of participants by the number of retweets (from larger to smaller). And what do we see?

Take the Spectre campaign as an example:

https://twitter.com/juanda_andrie - 799 shares | 166 Likes | 16815 stakes

If you take the example of a normal participant, then on average, for a similar campaign with so many participants comes out about 2-4k stacks. Does this mean that the guy works 7 times better than others? How can this be possible at all? One of the main questions, how do you calculate the number of reposts, more than the Spectre account itself? For example, in the Spectre account, there are only 513 tweets for today. And these are tweets that also include retweets of other accounts. I want to understand what is the point? And so not only in the Spectre, but also in other projects.

Also, in the rules of your campaign is often mentioned "Do not RT and like tweets that are more than two weeks old."
But as I understand this rule is not taken into account when counting.

Personally, I ran into another problem. All retweets I do with the likes at the same time. But at the same time for all their 119 counted retweets, counted 10 likes. I do not understand how this happens. Most likely all the calculations are done by some software, but this indicates that it does not work correctly.

Why and why did I decide to write this? Simply because it is unfair to all participants, and let it just bounty campaign, but any work should be done well and with a soul. As a normal person, you schedule your campaigns, what and when you should do it on time. To make 3-5 retweets per day is normal. But when you see such situations, when a person simply abuses, performing the whole company in one day and in addition gets a lot more stacks, the question immediately arises: if others do that, then why should not I?

I wish everyone good and a lot of stacks.

It's been a long time since the last post in twitter. Is everything alright with this campaign or devs have some problems? Or maybe they decided to close project?

when will you update the spreadsheet for us that newly joined?