Pages:
Author

Topic: Bounty Manager as a good Merit source! - page 2. (Read 619 times)

member
Activity: 420
Merit: 10
“Tackling Climate Change Using Blockchain”
September 22, 2018, 09:05:49 AM
#12
Bounty managers who don't do their job and pay spammers are the reason we have the Merit system. Making them merit sources would be just as bad as removing Merit entirely.

You maybe right I can understand how you look at bounty managers as someone who only works for money. But protecting the integrity of the site would be so easy for them, because they are the main person who can really see directly how their bounty hunters are doing in the campaign. Moderators won't be having a hard time looking at each post each day. And besides this is what the bounty managers are supposed to do and is paid for, they are responsible for checking the posts of their bounty hunters and would be the same person who warns them if they are not doing good posts. They can also remove bounty hunters from the campaign anytime when they are not doing their job. Maybe you are just so pessimistic about ideas that seem to you as impossible especially from a newbie. There are so many bounty managers that are really good, I see Lauda as a good example. I have not participated in the campaign manage by him but as I have looked at the spreadsheets you can see how each spammers and shitposters are marked red or maybe banned. There are so many good bounty managers if you would only open your mind and not to dismiss them easily like...Sylon, wapinter, hotachy, olcaytu2005 and many others that are too many to list down, and they are not just anybody they are hero and legendary forum members that knows a lot. And if your problem is that they could only increase spam, then there is a solution to that, like when merits will be given only at the end of the campaign and only a few selected Bounty hunters will have the chance to receive it. This reward system can help bounty hunters create good and meaningful post. And because BMs are responsible for allowing bad posts they can be liable such that they can be warned and eventually be given demerit if still allowing bad post even if they have been warned.


This is really a stupid suggestion, as this could just be solved by not giving stakes to the spammers by the bounty managers rather than making bounty managers as merit source. Huh


Calling these as a stupid suggestion is like calling good bounty hunters as stupid as well. Note that many BMs that are good are really high ranking forum members, the ones who ranked legendary and hero members.  I have a lot of respect to the good BMs especially the ones I have mentioned even if I have participated or not in their campaigns. They are good and hardworking. I am very sorry to disappoint you but I really can't agree with you on this. Don't make it too general and complicated...thanks!

legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
September 20, 2018, 07:26:21 AM
#11
I'm shocked - this would mean that bounty managers couldn't become merit sources. Smiley

But Surely the people who are allowing the floods of shiposts to count towards bounties would be the best people to hand out merits.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
September 20, 2018, 07:21:15 AM
#10
I've got a better idea - ban bounties on the forum!

I'm shocked - this would mean that bounty managers couldn't become merit sources. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1184
Merit: 1013
September 20, 2018, 07:15:46 AM
#9
I've got a better idea - ban bounties on the forum!
This is an excellent idea, but we can't do that.
If you think that way than if a forum is generating spams than the whole forum should shut down. But we don't do that we are trying to solve this issue as much as we can. we should just try solving problems not deleting a whole section as it could affect in the forum in many ways!
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
September 20, 2018, 07:06:26 AM
#8
I've got a better idea - ban bounties on the forum!
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 502
September 20, 2018, 07:06:04 AM
#7
I've got a better idea - don't allow bounty managers to award any sMerits.

Probably pointless as I doubt most bounty managers even have many merits, nor care enough to give it to the newbies. I do think that being a bounty manager and merit source should be mutually exclusive though as otherwise it couldeasily be used just to gain a competitive advantage.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1218
September 20, 2018, 07:00:41 AM
#6
I've got a better idea - don't allow bounty managers to award any sMerits.

Much better idea to pay bounty managers same time bounty hunters receive their tokens  Grin
This will force them to choose campaigns more wisely and protect hunters rights when devs tries to scam/decrease pool/etc.
legendary
Activity: 1184
Merit: 1013
September 20, 2018, 06:58:57 AM
#5
It has been a problem to maintain and check bitcointalk forum member's posts. Spams and so many posts that are not meaningful can best be seen by bounty manager. Thus it is good in my own analysis to make bounty managers as a merit source. Giving them the automatic sMerit value intended only to be given to the bounty hunters will probably give them the chance to promote only the deserving bounty hunters and allowing better opportunities for ranking up. This will also help the entire site to be checked constantly of posts that bounty hunters have created on the shortest time possible due to the direct access the BMs have over his bounty hunters. What do you think of this?


This is really a stupid suggestion, as this could just be solved by not giving stakes to the spammers by the bounty managers rather than making bounty managers as merit source. Huh

Bounty managers who don't do their job and pay spammers are the reason we have the Merit system. Making them merit sources would be just as bad as removing Merit entirely.
I guess OP whats every bounty manager to be a merit source like you. Grin
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 166
September 20, 2018, 06:57:31 AM
#4
It has been a problem to maintain and check bitcointalk forum member's posts. Spams and so many posts that are not meaningful can best be seen by bounty manager. Thus it is good in my own analysis to make bounty managers as a merit source. Giving them the automatic sMerit value intended only to be given to the bounty hunters will probably give them the chance to promote only the deserving bounty hunters and allowing better opportunities for ranking up. This will also help the entire site to be checked constantly of posts that bounty hunters have created on the shortest time possible due to the direct access the BMs have over his bounty hunters. What do you think of this?


Such a great idea, you made my day op
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
September 20, 2018, 06:57:03 AM
#3
I've got a better idea - don't allow bounty managers to award any sMerits.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
September 20, 2018, 06:51:39 AM
#2
Bounty managers who don't do their job and pay spammers are the reason we have the Merit system. Making them merit sources would be just as bad as removing Merit entirely.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 10
“Tackling Climate Change Using Blockchain”
September 20, 2018, 06:47:25 AM
#1
It has been a problem to maintain and check bitcointalk forum member's posts. Spams and so many posts that are not meaningful can best be seen by bounty manager. Thus it is good in my own analysis to make bounty managers as a merit source. Giving them the automatic sMerit value intended only to be given to the bounty hunters will probably give them the chance to promote only the deserving bounty hunters and allowing better opportunities for ranking up. This will also help the entire site to be checked constantly of posts that bounty hunters have created on the shortest time possible due to the direct access the BMs have over his bounty hunters. What do you think of this?

Pages:
Jump to: