Bounty manager (staff & merit source!) Anon11073 embezzling $4000 - page 2.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: kenjionline on May 04, 2018, 04:52:54 AM

Lauda is such a Lauda. Grin

kenjionline is such a kenjionline. Or is it?

Quote

Trust summary for kenjionline
This user's email address was changed recently.

This user changed his/her password recently.

Can we get back to the topic?

kenjionline

full member

Activity: 443

Merit: 101

Quote from: drogbaaa on May 04, 2018, 03:41:01 AM

Quote from: Anon11073 on May 03, 2018, 11:11:55 PM

Dear Lauda.

I have not misused the position of Bounty manager.
Please delete the minus trust you did.

You realy need to stop saying Please..please . you are a staff member .

Lauda sent 30 merit to a serial scammer and nobody questioned him/her. PM Theymos with this details.

January 27, 2018, 01:13:24 PM: 10 to aTriz for 🔥 Gunbot Twitter Campaign 🔥 [0.00025 PER REPORT] 🔥 [OPEN] 🔥
January 24, 2018, 10:42:36 PM:20 to aTriz for 🔥 Gunbot Twitter Campaign 🔥 [0.00025 PER REPORT] 🔥 [OPEN] 🔥

Yeah, And the topic was created on November 29, 2017, it gives him merit, with what for the starting topic of the bounty, and then paints the trust. Lauda is such a Lauda. Grin

drogbaaa

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 1

Quote from: Anon11073 on May 03, 2018, 11:11:55 PM

Dear Lauda.

I have not misused the position of Bounty manager.
Please delete the minus trust you did.

You realy need to stop saying Please..please . you are a staff member .

Lauda sent 30 merit to a serial scammer and nobody questioned him/her. PM Theymos with this details.

January 27, 2018, 01:13:24 PM: 10 to aTriz for 🔥 Gunbot Twitter Campaign 🔥 [0.00025 PER REPORT] 🔥 [OPEN] 🔥
January 26, 2018, 09:55:21 PM: 1 to minifrij for Re: Lauda/aTriz possible alts of each other [Merit Abuse]
January 26, 2018, 09:55:18 PM: 1 to Aventhe for Re: Lauda/aTriz possible alts of each other [Merit Abuse]
January 26, 2018, 09:55:05 PM: 1 to aTriz for Re: Lauda/aTriz possible alts of each other [Merit Abuse]
January 26, 2018, 01:57:56 PM: 5 to DannyHamilton for Re: Question regarding Multi Signature Addresses
January 26, 2018, 12:50:08 PM: 5 to TMAN for Re: TMAN's Level up challenge.
January 24, 2018, 10:58:31 PM: 1 to Vod for Re: What is the function of the "Merit" score?
January 24, 2018, 10:42:36 PM: 20 to aTriz for 🔥 Gunbot Twitter Campaign 🔥 [0.00025 PER REPORT] 🔥 [OPEN] 🔥

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: Anon11073 on May 03, 2018, 11:07:29 PM

Hello again, cotiniber.

Certainly I participated in the Bounty campaign from the middle, but the rules are the same as all the participants.
So I did not count the contents (Cosplay Token Info) posted to the Cosplay Token related thread.
It counts only posts to Alto Coin Thread etc. We post more than 10 postings over 80 letters a week.

Since this was posted on the 29th of January, that would mean the week 10 ends on the 9th of April. You've joined in the afternoon (4 PM) on the 6th of April, but I can't tell which timezone the sheet is in. Therefore, let's go with the earliest post on the 6th which is this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34052903 (page 6 of your post history). The first post on the 10th of April is this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34385132 (page 5).
I see 6 posts if you are counting every shitpost that doesn't fall into the 'if here, don't count it' category. Either I'm blind or you're lying. Which is it?

Quote from: Anon11073 on January 29, 2018, 06:59:34 AM

Signature campaign

Rules

At least ten posts are required per week by the end of ICO.
Only posts other than Cosplay Token related threads will be counted.
Posts must be over 80 letters and be constructive.
Posts with the following topics are not counted. Marketplace, Off-topic, Archival, Marketplace (Altcoins)

I have no problem removing the rating if you can prove the case wrong, but I don't see how you could do that.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Anon11073 on May 03, 2018, 11:11:55 PM

Dear Lauda.

I have not misused the position of Bounty manager.
Please delete the minus trust you did.

If you have a problem with lauda, I would advise you contact blazed, hilariousandco and salty. They are the reason why lauda is in the default trust network, despite the overwhelming community consensus that lauda should be excluded from DT. If they are unable to address your concerns, I would advise discussing the issue with theymos who can remove them from DT1 (and possibly from staff if he agrees adding lauda is a sign of poor judgment, which it is).

Anon11073

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 289

Twitter: @BTY_11073

Dear Lauda.

I have not misused the position of Bounty manager.
Please delete the minus trust you did.

Anon11073

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 289

Twitter: @BTY_11073

Hello again, cotiniber.

Certainly I participated in the Bounty campaign from the middle, but the rules are the same as all the participants.
So I did not count the contents (Cosplay Token Info) posted to the Cosplay Token related thread.
It counts only posts to Alto Coin Thread etc. We post more than 10 postings over 80 letters a week.
If my stakes are invalid, the stakes of many participants will also be invalid.

BTW, the token sale for this project has not yet started, and tokens are not distributed.

Please cease my watching as cotiniber.
I have not done cheating. Do you hate me? Huh

I am waiting for reply.

mdayonliner

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 420

We are Bitcoin!

Quote from: cotiniber on May 02, 2018, 07:44:24 PM

Thanks for suggestion, I edited the title. Eventually I may need to include his username explicitly to avoid further scam victims.

LoyceV deserves more than me coz s/he suggested it and I only backed it up. By the way it's much better

Quote from: cotiniber on May 02, 2018, 07:44:24 PM

Great, I am still new to this field and not familiar with how to deal with this kind of accusation, can you tell me how things go in this case? Maybe we should post the link to this thread in the original announcement thread of this token? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28898257

LoyceV (LOL again, seems like you are an expert in this kind of job) has a topic on the Scam Accusations board where s/he exposed scammer John547s3. I was scammed too by that user. What I did is... I sent same message to several media to make sure that the guy does not get paid for scamming both the company and the BitcoinTalk members. Read this for idea if you want to. I sent text to their telegram, Facebook, Twitter, email (got that from the admin of their teregram), reddit etc media to make sure somehow my message reaches to the project administrators. Hope this helps. You can keep following up with them until any of their administrators reply you with an acknowledgement.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

You said that he/she has posted 120 posts in 4 weeks? each participant were required to post 10 times per week, if he has 120 posts then he'd participated As 3 members. is there any mention of bounty manager decision to be the final decision? if yes then it has been at his own discretion to allow himself to take part as 3 members. moreover if Cosplay founder gave the manager permission to decide everything, it wouldn't be embezzlement.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 02, 2018, 01:21:10 PM

I thought that he was removed as Merit Source and Staff because of your thread.

He is still staff.

cotiniber

jr. member

Activity: 33

Merit: 17

So no one thinks that there is an exceptional counting culture of bounty manager's stakes to justify his counting? Then this seems a scam. Last time, his excuse for the 30 source merit abuse were very poor and never satisfactory, and this time there should be no room to excuse this scam in any way.

Quote from: LoyceV on May 02, 2018, 02:17:21 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on May 02, 2018, 02:11:29 PM

Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 02, 2018, 01:21:10 PM

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

I think that might have been digaran, who said he resigned as a merit source.

Correct:

Quote from: digaran on April 28, 2018, 11:14:38 PM

As of this moment I'm no longer a merit source. there was too much drama and clearly I wasn't trustworthy enough. I was unfit to represent this forum and the community. I have resigned.

I thought it was Anon11073 who was resigned, but he is still a merit source! Anyway I think now he should go away from the forum...

Quote from: mdayonliner on May 02, 2018, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on May 02, 2018, 02:17:21 PM

My suggestion: "Bounty manager (Staff!) embezzling $4000".

I do think the same like you. May be the title needs a bit of tweaks.

Thanks for suggestion, I edited the title. Eventually I may need to include his username explicitly to avoid further scam victims.

Quote from: jumbo on May 02, 2018, 04:44:27 PM

This ICO is an registered HK business, and they may press charges, since that's their promised prizes or other benefits for participants of promotional campaign were obtained by a fraudster with the use of deceit. Technically it shall count as theft and/or fraud in HK. I would recommend contacting their ICO CEO and their Legal Advisor to report that incident. Also, their reaction will tell a lot about the status and position of that person in their ranks.

Great, I am still new to this field and not familiar with how to deal with this kind of accusation, can you tell me how things go in this case? Maybe we should post the link to this thread in the original announcement thread of this token? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28898257

jumbo

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 29

This ICO is an registered HK business, and they may press charges, since that's their promised prizes or other benefits for participants of promotional campaign were obtained by a fraudster with the use of deceit. Technically it shall count as theft and/or fraud in HK. I would recommend contacting their ICO CEO and their Legal Advisor to report that incident. Also, their reaction will tell a lot about the status and position of that person in their ranks.

mdayonliner

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 420

We are Bitcoin!

@InvoKing: Seems like you have done some research about this Japanese board. I assume your numbers are correct. I have noticed more merit abusing on the local boards than the regular boards, it's the feeling I get. I have investigated 16 merit abusing cases where I found over 60+ abusers and red tagged those users so I guess my feeling is based on experience. It contains some weight, not just a feeling I got out of the thin air.

I am still awaiting for Anon11073 to see his statement against this acquisition.

Quote from: LoyceV on May 02, 2018, 02:17:21 PM

My suggestion: "Bounty manager (Staff!) embezzling $4000".

I do think the same like you. May be the title needs a bit of tweaks.

InvoKing

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1065

✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )

It is theymos choice.
I will talk in general not only about this topic : the Japanese users have the right to receive smerit like any other local sub users that's why they have 4? merit sources!
4? merit sources to reward users writing posts with 0/10 quality?
While reading, the excuse is that since we don't have good quality posts and we need to spend smerit, let's reward posts with poor quality??
Yeah, let's boost mediocrity...

Code:

When small men attempt great enterprises, they always end by reducing them to the level of their mediocrity.

Where did I wrote my size=1 comment weeks ago on the nomination day...
Should I blame others in the future doing unethical things? Conflict of interest they said...that's disgusting.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: MadZ on May 02, 2018, 01:05:46 PM

This should be in scam accusations, not meta.

If it's about a Staff member, I think it belongs in Meta. But in that case the topic title should be more clear.
My suggestion: "Bounty manager (Staff!) embezzling $4000".

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on May 02, 2018, 02:11:29 PM

Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 02, 2018, 01:21:10 PM

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

I think that might have been digaran, who said he resigned as a merit source.

Correct:

Quote from: digaran on April 28, 2018, 11:14:38 PM

As of this moment I'm no longer a merit source. there was too much drama and clearly I wasn't trustworthy enough. I was unfit to represent this forum and the community. I have resigned.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 7005

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 02, 2018, 01:21:10 PM

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

Theymos need to intervene, I think staff and bounty manager are two conflicting position.

I think that might have been digaran, who said he resigned as a merit source.

None of this is surprising to me, and people who are allowed to just keep doing what they're doing after they apologize will continue doing it. I'll be interested to hear what Anon11073 has to say about this, assuming he stops by this thread.

mdayonliner

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 420

We are Bitcoin!

Quote from: r1s2g3 on May 02, 2018, 01:21:10 PM

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

As per my knowledge it's not him, it's another member who was removed. I do not want to mention his username for some reason.

Quote from: MadZ on May 02, 2018, 01:05:46 PM

This should be in scam accusations, not meta. That being said, I'd definitely go ahead and contact whoever he is running the campaign for, I'm sure they would like to know.

I was also having a thought that this is not something for Meta board but I was not really sure about the appropriate board for this. Seems like scam accusations is the board for this topic. I hope OP move this to scam accusations board.

r1s2g3

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 395

I am alive but in hibernation.

I thought that he was removed as Merit Source and Staff because of your thread.

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

Theymos need to intervene, I think staff and bounty manager are two conflicting position.

MadZ

hero member

Activity: 908

Merit: 657

This should be in scam accusations, not meta. That being said, I'd definitely go ahead and contact whoever he is running the campaign for, I'm sure they would like to know.

mdayonliner

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 420

We are Bitcoin!

Again! another accusation!!!
I am interested to see this time what will be his explanations. Last time I bought his story but could not agree with his merit abusing excuses. I will keep my eyes open for this topic.

Topic: Bounty manager (staff & merit source!) Anon11073 embezzling $4000 - page 2. (Read 937 times)