Pages:
Author

Topic: [BOUNTY] Open Source pooled mining platform with web interface - page 4. (Read 18788 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Hey all,

have a poke at http://pool.bitcoin-central.net/

Comments and megahashes welcome

Checking it out...what port do you use for the miner's?  And what's your pay-per-share rate?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
Hey all,

have a poke at http://pool.bitcoin-central.net/

Comments and megahashes welcome
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley

Since the network is designed to pay 50 BTC to whomever solves a given block; we are stuck with the current collection of competing pools implementation.  Any change to this would require forking the blockchain and creating a new currency.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
What is the point of an API for a pool system?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
LAWL, Do me a favour and prove to me that rails is more better...
Hopefully results will speak for themselves Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
*On a serious note when do you think you'll be releasing a preview?
I'll release the fully functional app by tomorrow evening for a 24h test session against testnet and then it goes live.
The app is ready, I'm busy on heavy automated testing right now.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
LAWL, Do me a favour and prove to me that rails is more better... that's right I said it...


*On a serious note when do you think you'll be releasing a preview?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.

That's terribly disappointing.  Their VPS worked great for me, and I was thinking about getting a rack...

The whole datacenter has had ongoing network issues for years, with no sign of improvement. Sad
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley

I agree due to the fact that there are many bugs in my v2.0 software and I'd like to see what he has to offer
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 13
I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.

That's terribly disappointing.  Their VPS worked great for me, and I was thinking about getting a rack...

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.

This is just my theory but If you had just even 10,000 miners over a whole bitcoin network evenly distributing 50BTC everyone would get 0.005 per ten minutes average. I don't think it would be much better for proportional maybe possibly 0.05 being optimistic. about .3 every hour 7.2 a day.

I will do that same for 1,000,000 (I don't know the actual miners but this might happen someday if it goes mainstream)

50BTC divided by 1,000,000 = 0.00005 every ten minutes
thats 0.0003 every hour
0.0072 everyday
0.216BTC every month

Conclusion there is no gain beyond this point, half the network stops mining but more then 1,000,000 million people are using bitcoins so it takes for ever for your transaction to go through

again just a theory somebody correct me im wrong or add and dooms day thoughts on the matter below......
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
I think all I need is score support for reward payout and internationalization and I have fullfilled the bounty correct me if im wrong plz Smiley
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10617.msg152161#msg152161
I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
I think all I need is score support for reward payout and internationalization and I have fullfilled the bounty correct me if im wrong plz Smiley
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10617.msg152161#msg152161
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
What kind of connection issues? Ive been expericing my miner dropping out every so often my self with leetnet, and kalyhost for the record still havent replied
Pages:
Jump to: