Topic: Bounty Question - page 8. (Read 12619 times)
If the project has not reached a goal, but continues to work and not to pay tokens, then it is not normal, they are just trying to save money on bounty hunters who spent their time and energy on their project ...
It is normal as the project already failed and the development will be on hold. It doesn't make sense to pay bounty hunters for useless tokens. I have participated in 100+ bounties and 80% of the tokens are useless and some projects didn't pay us. I would rather not get paid instead of holding a shitcoin.
Is it normal that projects will not pay bounty rewards because their sales doesnt reached the target?
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
Every job has its own risk likewise bounty campaigns too failure of an ICO if both Soft Cap or Hard Cap is not reached some ICOs will make an announcement through the bounty manager declaring non payment of rewards this will definitely affects all the participants thus these are some the risk attached to bounty hunting, imagine working for several months promoting an ICO and at the end no payment was made this amount to wasted time and efforts and very discouraging however a through research is a way out of avoiding non paying bounties. Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
Don't you think it's logical not pay you a worthless token, in a situation whereby the fund raising software isn't reached i don't see any reason why the project should continue and distribute useless tokens.
Bounty hunters should always be ready to be left without payment and there were many such cases in my practice. There is nothing to be done about it and it is useless to complain.
Surely the hunter has experienced it like that sometimes gets paid but there is no price at all just being trash in the wallet, the hunter must be good at choosing projects that are worth following so there is no remorse later.I rarely take part in these projects. When deciding to participate in Bounty programs, each user must be aware of the degree of risk. The fact is that at the moment there are no clear rules for regulating the distribution of coins and as a result, the team receives the freedom of action. The result is the abolition of any guarantees: the user can fulfill all the conditions set and ultimately do not receive any reward simply because the manager wanted so.
Usually the bonus manager is also hired as bounty hunter, if the project fails, they may not receive anything. If you want to be sure of getting paid, bounty is not suitable for you.
Many bounty hunters enter the project when they see that it has collected or is close to softcap. This may be a weak guarantee that they can get at least something.
Projects like Envion, Tpay didn't pay hunters even after reaching their hardcap. Maybe the forum can come up with escrow that will be holding bounty funds to ensure hunters gets paid at the end of the ICOs.
Escrow's are a last resort when it comes down to a situation like that. The CEO should manage a bounty campaign, if he doesn't pay up then his project is finished.
Projects like Envion, Tpay didn't pay hunters even after reaching their hardcap. Maybe the forum can come up with escrow that will be holding bounty funds to ensure hunters gets paid at the end of the ICOs.
Is it normal that projects will not pay bounty rewards because their sales doesnt reached the target?
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
They will not pay Bounty hunters if the project they run does not hit the target. And that has happened that no one is responsible for the action. Bounty managers, in this case, are certainly not to blame for they just run the job. We must be careful and continuously check.
before engaging in a bounty it is necessary to see the project, if this is not the first day to know about fees, if a week is nothing collected nothing and will not collect, go past
Is it normal that projects will not pay bounty rewards because their sales doesnt reached the target?
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
That's the reality in crypto world now that by joining bounty is not worth mostly because many projects now doesn't pay their bounty hunter at the end of the campaign. And that is the sad truth even you study their project very well,still you not hold the future of it. Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
I think bounty manager is not liable of it because if the project failed the founder will not give to the bounty the allocation budget for the hunters. It means it is scam and the bounty manager also scammed. Well,that's what i think.
Its risky to put youre time on a campaign especially if that is unknown project or lack integrity in launching one. Bounty is created to help ICO or IEO projects gain tractions on doing promotions, well if the ICO failed sorry to say that it is always on the disclaimer on the campaign. Hunters always should accept the consequence of this kind of system.
That's the sad truth in bounty hunting, when they fail, we fail as well, and the fact that majority of the projects fail, that makes us having a less chance to earn from bounty hunting. This is life in crypto bounty hunting, no assurance, you have to take the risk, if they fail, your effort is worthless to them. 
This is likely the risk associated with bounty hunter, you go into an agreement to start bounty and you receive your reward at the end. If the project turns out a failure then it's a sure thing there won't be payment. This is why it is always good to do some research before starting any bounty project.
Strongly agree, each gift program is of course different rules and we must really understand that, and every one of us who wants to join the prize program must make his research first because every guarantee and agreement given by the gift program does not necessarily run completely, even though they are trying to make the best on their gift program.
This is likely the risk associated with bounty hunter, you go into an agreement to start bounty and you receive your reward at the end. If the project turns out a failure then it's a sure thing there won't be payment. This is why it is always good to do some research before starting any bounty project.
Its risky to put youre time on a campaign especially if that is unknown project or lack integrity in launching one. Bounty is created to help ICO or IEO projects gain tractions on doing promotions, well if the ICO failed sorry to say that it is always on the disclaimer on the campaign. Hunters always should accept the consequence of this kind of system.
I agree with many comments that the bounty manager is the same employee as we are. He receives a salary and operates only with information received from the development team, so sometimes even they cannot determine the scam. Personally, I think it is worth participating in a larger number of projects, so there are more chances to get your coins that will be traded on exchanges with a good course than to study a huge amount of information, and then also get scam.
it is true that an ICO will not pay the bounty when the project fails. even the manager of the project will not be bothered by the failure of the project. but usually on an ICO system most projects fail because there are team members who are less responsible for the entry of investor funds to them. then later they escaped the money that was supposed to be used to support and facilitate the running of the project.
Perhaps you are a newcomer to the bounty campaign, so you ask such questions. When you do a bounty campaign long enough, you will realize that there are many bounty projects that you do, projects never pay the token for you since that projects scam or mobilize very little compared to the hardcap. My experience is that you learn to choose good quality bounty projects to join.
Is it normal that projects will not pay bounty rewards because their sales doesnt reached the target?
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
Is the bounty manager will be liable to here even its not in their control that ICO failed?
I want to joined Soc Med campaign but I read somewhere that some projects really dont pay at end because of ICO failure.
Many ICOs that failed cannot move forward anymore. Most of them will return all the investments. And since they will not anymore mint any coin, the bounty hunters will also receive nothing in return. Projects conduct ICO with softcaps. This is based on the minimum amount of resources the project need in order for them to be able to move forward and develop their product. Failing this is also failing to meet their minimum target.
Also, bounty managers do not have any control of this.
Jump to: