Topic: BOUNTY TASKS ARE VERY DEMANDING - page 5. (Read 610 times)

Huh!

Cribbing for 15 post under signature campaign is just appauling. Creating a thread without discussing the issue with the bounty manager gives him a bad reputation. This shows how uncomfortable bounty hunters are under  his management.

You should have discussed this issue with him first. Hunters like you have to given a bad reputation to bounty hunting.

I always follow the projects that he handles, in my opinion the rules are not too strict but it's fair enough because many bounty hunters who spam posts either on social media or others (eg 4 posts in 1 day) so they can complete the task only 1- 2 days only.
maybe that's the consideration

Hello @OP, thank you for some feedback on this thread, at least from this thread i can give an explanation to anyone.

signature campaign
3 post a day: actually you can make a post 4 per day if you want in case 1 post deleted by mod, you have backup for deleted post. Many member creating up to 20 post/week, so, if 3 posts deleted by mod, this member has 17 posts left, and it will safe to get rewards. Except you are make a post in 1 thread and before stake counted the thread deleted so you lost all of your post.

Social Media
I know 6 posts per week and 6 share per week for social media campaign will be hard to member to create original post, so i change it and accepted copy & paste post, so you don't need to thinking about your own word. You just need 30 second to copy & paste text from white paper and 30 second to share post from spyce socmed account. As you know, i always says to participant if there no post from team, you just need create a post by self. So it just need 30 second to do the task.

In my view, to do all social media campaign, you just need to give 5 minutes from 24 hours. I always says to anyone if you can't continue to work, tell me, and i will keep the stake even just 2 week. What you need just talk with me directly, and i will try to give a solution if i can.

Probably because they are used to seeing bounties of 10 post a week wherein they can post burst in one day, easy peasy for them. And now comes @masulum, changing how everything works in bounties and those hunters says, "WTF is going on, I have a lot of alts to maintain, can't do 15 posts a weeks', LMAO.

Move on, if @masulum is making life hard for you to maintain your accounts instead of bitching around and trying to portray him to be the bad guy here.

If you think you can not post 15 per week, why you think about joining masulum's campaign? I would only join to campaigns which I can maintain, no matter which project it is. Do not be forced to post, do it at yout interest.

Why do you think like this? There is no concrete evidence about the account farming and this guy just shared his opinion here. It is ok to show respect for the reputable bounty managers. Masulum has done an awesome job with managing the legit Spyce bounty campaigns and I will not hesitate to join the future campaign of the Masulum. BTW, if account farming is the case you can open a new scam accusation thread with all the proofs about the linked accounts. Surely, other scam busters will help you on your way.

Same view here. If you can't comply with the rules, better not join and look for other bounty programs. Actually, reading his sig campaign rules, it is already lenient, 15 posts/week and 3 posts max/day. If you will post quality comments, you will have no problem of worrying that your post will be deleted. But if you feel that one or more of your posts might be deleted, just post more than what is required. You are not here in the forum just for this bounty but a lot more than that. And also, visit and comment on threads that are really worth visiting to, which means maybe less spammers. sorry, but I don't see his requirements as too demanding. if you will look at other sig campaigns, they have more requirements than this.

Why do you complain and whine all the time?
It is not enough that people run farms and have multiple accounts so you want to make their work easier,
or maybe you are part of something like that?

This is the first time i am coming across this user as i am not a big time alt coin enthusiast and i do not remember the last time i enrolled in an alt coins campaign, but if he is having a strict rules regarding the number of points counted per day and if you are not able to comply then you have the option to avoid joining the campaign, 3 posts per day counted is challenging if you are going to the office as you might miss posting every now and then depending on your workload.

My experience in joining a bounty campaign handled by masulum: very fun.

The rules set are indeed strict, with the aim of reducing spammers and cheaters. So that the purpose of holding the bounty campaign can be obtained maximally and fairly. After all, the two bounties mentioned by TS are Sheng and Spyce, both are fixed payments, so I think it's worth the challenge.

NB: IMO, there are no rules to change because it is very effective in selecting participants. After all, it's the full authority of the bounty manager and the dev team. As bounty hunters, we must understand that. If we feel unable, then don't join

to be honest the strict rules in the bounty project are a good step to anticipate fraudulent actions such as multiple accounts in the campaign. problems regarding postal rules etc. I think it's worth it if the project you are participating in is really good, as far as I know, for example projects that pay participants using BTC are much more stringent in all aspects, be it in terms of number of posts / quality of posts, number of participants and must also have 5 merits in the last 120 days.

Maybe the mentioned posting guidelines are there for a reason, Masulum is known as one of the best bounty managers here. The post restriction is used for preventing the abuse of the bounty campaign,if the bounty hunter feels uncomfortable moving to another bounty campaign the best choice, IMHO. 3 posts per day is not acceptable because a minimum of 5 days in a week should be a target without considering the deleted post problem.

Happy to see your comment, I understand how sad it can be as for the manger and for the success of the project. There can be a maximum of 4 post count per day, and a minimum of 4 days post for signature. Not maximum of  3post count per day, sanction will be meted out on violators as a way of outright removal and loss of reward. 

Hei boy, have you contacted @masulum before you made this thread?
In my opinion, the best way to solve this problem is by communicating with him and directly send your suggestion to him. Then, you can create such a thread like this if you get no responses at all. As you said he is a good manager, so I am pretty sure that he will listen and take attention to every problem, suggestion, or feedback from the participants. Anyway, related to the rules, sometimes it is not only the bounty manager's decision. The team of the project can ask for a specific target related to the bounty program, including the number of posts daily (/day) in the signature campaign.

He did that so that the news is always there every day so that all new also see it. in my opinion the rules he made are not too strict because there are only 15 posts every week and 3 posts every day, if you really feel this tight then don't follow his campaign, it's easy, right

I think in my honest opinion that rules are good and it guides participants greatly.

I want to comment on your aspect that says 3 post for per day and to be frank, it is an honest rules and guidelines for participants, It helps the bounty manager to avoid unnecessary complains from hunters, and also, hunters reading rules won't have such problems following simple rules.

Here is a copy of the signature rules:

pichost

I will advise that even when we are not enrolled in any campaign, we should continue to contribute to the forum because it aids our chances alot.

His rules are so strict because many hunters abuse lenient rules.
For example, hunter will come on monday, do his 6 linkedin likes and end it. That kind of burst liking only damages the project.
Same goes for signature, most hunters will burstpost in offtopic and that's it. And that's not how bounty should work

Yes i think rules should not be that strict and i suggest following rules with reference to signature campaigna nd similar rules can be applied to other campaigns.
1) Daily post limit should be 4 and not 3 it makes hunters job tougher.
2) Maximum weekly post requirement for signature campaign should be 10 to 12. More posts requirement will result in useless/spam posts that will decrease the quality of the content.
Alao if some ones post is deleted by the moderator at eleventh hour the bounty management team should be kind enough to give hunter the stakes. I mean if he has done his job why would you deprive him of his reward? Also 1 less post does not make any difference, you should pay him for 14 posts right that is already way more than 10 posts requirement by 9o% of the campaigns.
 
Similarly social media should require 4 to 5 posts weekly with 1 post daily limit.

Masulum is one bounty manager that handles good projects without doubt and make due diligence in stakes calculations and he is always detailed to the later. Here is his profile link https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/masulum-1283017, he handled ShengWorld, SPYCE https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/distribution-complete-spyce-rise-of-web-30-trade-on-bwcom-5231395  and others nice project. I have been trading SPYCE on BW before they had their bounty project. Nevertheless he seems to be too tough on his community who participates on his bounty program which is something not too good. For example, in his rules, he demands signature campaigners to make a minimum of 15post per week and a maximum of 3 post count per week, a good bitcointalker should be through with his post in 5 days at 3 per day, although if mode deletes one post at a dead hour without one been aware, one will loss reward for that week. And his social media campaigns like the Linkedin is 6 post per week and a maximum of 1 share per day, one really need to on a high alert in other not to work for free.  Some of my friends had to back out because of the strict and tasky rules, while some will have to lost their reward due tasky work.

I want you to share your experience working with this BM as regards the rules and task, do you equally think he should review his rules? I hope he sees this and read it. He is a good manager though who never fails to resolve issues and very detailed.