Pages:
Author

Topic: 🧐 Bounty vs Buying likes, views, followers etc - page 3. (Read 965 times)

hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
There's no authenticity with buying those artificial gains in social media. Unlike in bounty, you get to know more about real people engaging in your project. There can be pros and cons for both methods and it depends to your taste how you'll work for your project.

And you know why they choose to have their bounty through their tokens? it costs nothing for developers if they'll pay their tokens to bounty hunters.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1151
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Bonjour, community. I have quite big experience with Bounty since 2016. It's not only participation, but also creation and managing. And I was always asking my self since 2017 end same question. Why the hell project managers prefer bounty rather than just buying cheap likes, views, followers / subs, comments, saves etc? From my understanding, bounty hunters are not the community of the project they work with. ALl they want to do is to run away with BTC after they sell their tokens.

At the same time, when you buy likes and other stuff, it has many advantages:
1) you do not give tokens to the ones who don't need them
2) buying activities will cost you $ cents
3) the "smart" purchase of likes, views and followers can push you to the social media top (youtube, instagram etc)

And yes, as an example, you may find YouTube views for 10$ per 1,000 views, but it is an insane price. It costs around 1$-2$ normally.

If you were ICO,IEO founder, what would you choose?

with a such big experience, you should know that buying likes costs money, and bounty hunters are provided with tokens, that could become worthless if the project is not successful, so there is no expenses in the beginning on marketing, that is the one and only advantage of bounty to any other type of marketing (buying likes/views/followers included)
would you accept to be paid in some tokens that could worth something, but there is a high risk of failure?
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567
Bonjour, community. I have quite big experience with Bounty since 2016. It's not only participation, but also creation and managing. And I was always asking my self since 2017 end same question. Why the hell project managers prefer bounty rather than just buying cheap likes, views, followers / subs, comments, saves etc? From my understanding, bounty hunters are not the community of the project they work with. ALl they want to do is to run away with BTC after they sell their tokens.

At the same time, when you buy likes and other stuff, it has many advantages:
1) you do not give tokens to the ones who don't need them
2) buying activities will cost you $ cents
3) the "smart" purchase of likes, views and followers can push you to the social media top (youtube, instagram etc)

And yes, as an example, you may find YouTube views for 10$ per 1,000 views, but it is an insane price. It costs around 1$-2$ normally.

If you were ICO,IEO founder, what would you choose?

You are encouraging faking the project's campaign, it's preferable to pay bounty hunters because the majority of them has real followers that will likely invest in a project, projects wants success and they cannot get that if you encourage buying fake views and followers, and please stop blaming bounty hunters they have the right to sell them at any time they wish because they worked for it.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 14
I would choose the both because they serve their own different functions. One thing about bounty campaign which most people fail to understand is that its a cheaper way of marketing. For you to buy such likes and real followers, it's costlier than using bounty hunters. What I would do as an ICO or IEO project is to get the services of top influencers not the services of hunters.
hero member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 577
Am sure project owners are aware of buying fake likes, views, followers etc but they still opt for bounty,
And if you look at it, the YouTube campaign requires participants to make their own videos sometimes in native language translated in English, you can't buy that.
Social media on the other hand also requires participants to share and like on their own soc med page which means wider audience instead of just liking the page of the project and that's it,
This are my thoughts, maybe there are other reasons why they opt for bounty instead of just buying fake likes, views followers and what have you.

And as for bounty participants not being part of community, I will disagree with you on that, some hunters are mostly part of a project community even after bounty ended.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1187
LOL, how can do you think buying likes, views and followers is good for the project?
You should know, likes and followers you buyed from someone is not always a real person, probably a bots. Since bounty program is aiming to attract investors for invest in their project. How can a bots will invest in their project? Tongue

Also bounty program is doesn't require any cost to start distribution (free), this is why many project can easily start a bounty program. You don't need any budget for it, it's different if you buy followers, likes or pay with valuable coins.
jr. member
Activity: 138
Merit: 3
SMM (0.03$/1k)
Bonjour, community. I have quite big experience with Bounty since 2016. It's not only participation, but also creation and managing. And I was always asking my self since 2017 end same question. Why the hell project managers prefer bounty rather than just buying cheap likes, views, followers / subs, comments, saves etc? From my understanding, bounty hunters are not the community of the project they work with. ALl they want to do is to run away with BTC after they sell their tokens.

At the same time, when you buy likes and other stuff, it has many advantages:
1) you do not give tokens to the ones who don't need them
2) buying activities will cost you $ cents
3) the "smart" purchase of likes, views and followers can push you to the social media top (youtube, instagram etc)

And yes, as an example, you may find YouTube views for 10$ per 1,000 views, but it is an insane price. It costs around 1$-2$ normally.

If you were ICO,IEO founder, what would you choose?
Pages:
Jump to: