Topic: [BOUNTY][ICO] MINERVA (OWL) 🦉 Smart Money on 💎 Ethereum - page 60. (Read 57847 times)

Greeting I am writing for your signature campaign.
I just became Senior Member, can you please update my status on spread?

The guys have already completed ISO? Is there information about the project case? Thank you in advance))

Why do you have my purse for one letter is not properly registered. let's check please. let's solve the problem with the wallet. 0x1FbF75eBE29c9f2b08b63AA7dD0dFC92d94C79aa

I have joined in the bounty of an article campaign, good luck

Dear Sir,
How are you? I joined your facebook and telegram campaign and already started working but i made a mistake to give you my bitcoin talk profile URL.My facebook spread sheet no: 796 and My Telegram spread sheet no: 429.

here is my exact bitcoin talk link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gru-minions-1160362


Please check it and kindly consider it and update my name on your facebook and telegram spread sheet.
Thank You.

Hi dev. Why is there no activity in the spreadsheet? When will the steaks be calculated for the past period? Your inactivity and change in interest do not inspire confidence in you.

Retweets:
https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/920383060008488960
https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/920384616686637056
https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/920447988484407296

well, they fuck you guys, no other words. and people will trust in an ICO that fuck is workers, we are not in 1900... ?  *

*read london jack - whitechapel

Agreed from my side. If it wasn't a mistake but simply a twist and turn this is bad treatment of and contempt for bounty hunters. I would be dissapointed in Minerva. If it was a true mistake I can have understanding for that, since we're all human. But then I do feel they should compensate bounty hunters like you with a 2.5%, to make up for their own mistake. That would be fair policy to me and that is how I would deal with this. I also feel it would be good if they would give out a clear statement here in this topic. I'm not further going to participate in the discussion, but I saw in the Authorship topic what unfair treatment of bounty hunters can do to a project. Minerva shouldn't take a gamble with this. Transparancy, clarity and fairness are highly appreciated in a scene where so many scammers dwell (both on the project side as on the bounty hunter side).

Maybe its because some country don't get/or a few one/ investors (indou, romanian, etc..), so translation don't give them so much coin. But french people are real big investors, so a nice translation with our best french translator deserve his stake.

I just said maybe.. but its possible people didn't get that indou will invest 0.005eth and french 10k...

Still, if that's okay for you, this is not okay for people who translated the thread with these 2,5% in mind, i had the time to take the bounty, translate it after few days and it was still 2,5% at the moment i finished since i took the bbcode to translate the bounty thread too, it seems really Big to be a "mistake" , and that "mistake" made a lot of people choose this bounty between August and septembre, and now they have enough people they discovered a supposed "mistake " weeks after the beginning of the bounty when they had enough participants, this is how It looks since they were hiding the change until i discover it.

Imagine in real life someone  gives you a job to do, promise a specific reward and once your work is done, he tells you " ha sorry it was a miscalculation after all, you won't even get 50% of what we offered to you, deal with it" , no honest person would do that and this is not because we are in a crypto world that it's acceptable to have such behavior.

This is just totally dishonest, even if it does not affect you, it should make you think, if they are being like this and hiding it changing What was written without warning people and without offering any solution to people who came here with the Old information, they are not trust worthy and could do other change to the ICO for supposed "mistakes" discovered weeks after enough is collected..

You should in fact watch their reaction to this issue to see if they are trust worthy or not , if they are pro or not, a really serious project would discuss and offer a fair solution for first participants if It's really a mistake, so their next move will show something important for investors.



Edit : and i now have the proof it was not a typo mistake since the dev stated several Time himself 2,5% for the bounties, talking about translation in the same sentence. So now a lie, this is not going in the good direction...

I joined the campaign on Twitter. I wish to make the trade easy and reliable. success minerva. 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nd4iF8sw46HOMuvgFQwLfHcZL2KEEuD4SSmvsPdVGEM/edit#gid=920998215

Signature page line 131 fake profil, fake eth address.

Please check

26.09.2017 02:09:01   vincetsm   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vincetcm-820441   1484   Senior Member   0x053731A1CfBA4880dA369d3DECBCeBF7069688f8   

I read a reply from a team member at Telegram. The 2.5% counts for the 'bug / hacker bounty'. I understand that they by mistake posted that 2.5% for the other bounties, and when they discovered the mistake it was changed to 1%. That was already a month ago or so. Which could be correct since my translation of 3 Oct. indeed reflects the 1%.

This typo explanation I find reasonable to accept. For me it doesn't matter since the change doesn't affect me. But the explanation does make me happy because I can keep my trust in the project, which was shaken somewhat today.

Exactly, this is why it's good to bring some regulation to this market, to avoid such unethical behavior.

I if had not spotted it, people would have discovered it at the end. And here i thought the team was serious...




An ethical and honest behavior now would be to give to all Participants who were here before the change What they would have gotten with thé 2,5% or just come back to 2,5% to everyone.

Or, they can do like some crooks and just be in " who cares about stupid bounty hunters, let them talk " mode but that would be very disappointing for the futur of the project...


I also have It on my translated thread
I was totally transparent changing the number to show What it was before

week 5 (11.10-18.10)
Facebook url:https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin
Friends: 677
Reposts:
1https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin/posts/1503795473029736
2https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin/posts/1503833786359238
3https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin/posts/1503834039692546
4https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin/posts/1503838419692108
5https://www.facebook.com/ilyas.khismatyllin/posts/1503838559692094

Please update my TWITTER friends counter, now it 5200.
TWITTER spreadsheet ID 355.

нeдeлю (12.10-18.10)

Tвиттep ccылкe : https://twitter.com/Margoslen
Пocлeдoвaтeлeй: 2234

peтвит :
12/10- https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/917819801611001856
15/10- https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/915407307030351872
16/10- https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/919745673146392578
17/10- https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/920447988484407296
18/10- https://twitter.com/minervatoken/status/920383060008488960

Thank you for that.

I can imagine that many people are affraid of getting disqualified when protesting too loudly. Or perhaps they fear that their earned coins will become worthless when there's a lot of commotion. I recently found myself in the middle of a lot of emotion when Authorship (ATS) changed their bounty rules. It eventually ruined their project. I'm not going to beat the drums here too loud as I invested with two translatlions and moderations. But I feel Minerva here is acting unethically and unfair.

Interesting didn't notice the % shift, very dissappointed. Hopefullt they will honour 2.5% to those of us who entered that agreement?