1) This API question was asked to you, not to every participant.
2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing.
3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real!
I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports.
A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API!
4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so.
Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ?
In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it.
5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me!
If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place.
2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing.
3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real!
I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports.
A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API!
4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so.
Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ?
In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it.
5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me!
If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place.
Hey. If this question was addressed to me, then I really didnt have a general idea of how the Twitter API works, because I never tried to figure it out. In that case, could you at least partially explain how this works? I think this would be useful for all participants.
I am an ordinary person, still a beginner in the field of crypto-currency. And this means that you do not understand me correctly. I do not order, but only say my thoughts about this situation, I advise in a friendly manner. I also do not tell you that you owe me something. But at the same time you are the representative of the campaign for which you take responsibility. So it's you who are responsible for the correct distribution of the stakes, and no matter how it's done, right?
So please do not take my words wrong. I decided to write all this just because others doubt or are afraid to do it. Just because I'm worried because of this injustice. That is why I would like to understand this, so that in the future such problems simply did not arise.
I will give a simple example, because I dont understand. What is the difference between these member accounts?
I filtered all the participants in the spreadsheets by the number of counted retweets, I chose several for an example. Some of them already wrote about this topic.
These participants in the recounting of the stacks received 1 retweet and 82 likes: - get 435 stakes
https://twitter.com/LuveLifePost | https://twitter.com/dzmitry_zayats | https://twitter.com/erickquiap
And these participants in recounting the stacks received 82 retweets and 82 likes: - get 2055 stakes
https://twitter.com/LakingBitcoin | https://twitter.com/sebatascahaya | https://twitter.com/alfen_lark
You are right, I do not understand how the Twitter API works, but just explain to me, how do these accounts differ? Honestly I'll tell you, I would prefer the first 3, because they look more alive than the last. They do less reposts in a row, but more often and in my opinion they make better advertising for the project. But with this and the second 3 accounts do not stand out, all the usual people. Just compare, not as a bounty manager, but as a person.
I want to know why the first got 5 times less than the second? What are they worse?
You say, "In general, I do not care what you (or any other person) think of me!" But why? Does your loyalty mean nothing to you? Personally, I like many projects in which you are a bounty manager, so I'm not ready to give them up. I just, like many, want to understand how to properly conduct their social network, so that there are no such situations.
P.S. And one more question that I also do not have an answer for. If the API Twitter is the perfect machine to trust, then I want to understand how it counts the number of retweets and likes more than they already exist on the account?
For example, the REGA campaign, they have only 182 tweets, including retweets, which should not give stacks. At the same time, for some of the participants, the API considers the number more than there are any. How is possible?
Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZVvFvxwTVMy5gb5cofTbl5kvxYhc563Qs8GQbIdR5q8/edit#gid=289828385
I must admit that I was wrong.
