BREAKING: Musk “Will Consider” Bringing Alex Jones Back on X...

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 05:48:23 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 02:12:21 PM

The shrewdest people and the slyest people aren't always the smartest people. We can see this from the fact that people like Klaus Schwab and Soros are strong proponents of freedom. They are attempting to use their freedom to take the freedom away from other people. But the signs of their slyness breaking down are evident in the ways that people are waking up to them. If they had only been gracious, and offered more freedom to the people, they would have been set up on pedestals by the people, forever. But now they are going to fail due to the ways they are going about things.

Is Biden holding campaigns with people from the public gathering to hear him talk? If he has, few people are coming to them. But loads of people are sounding off in favor of Trump. If the manipulations by the Dems are causing Trump to not get the votes he should be getting... that's election fraud.

-Well, the Trump fans are certainly not interested at all in making sure that biological laboratories are secure, so I do not care about them at all. The only thing that Trump has going for him is that he is up against Biden. And that is why we need instant runoff voting. And I will always vote for a third party candidate until we get instant runoff voting or something like that. People may call me a spoiler, but I call them morons for being completely incapable of understanding instant runoff voting.

P.S. People are so dumb that they do not even realize that instant runoff voting still works regardless of whether you understand it or not. And if people do not understand the inner workings, then that is better since they will vote sincerely instead of strategically.

Hooray. A voting system that is too complicated for anyone to understand will get people to vote sincerely. This is why we should make the voting algorithm needlessly complicated and convoluted. Maybe we can use AI with deterministic but pseudorandom training to decide the next election. Nobody will understand the inner workings, so everyone will vote sincerely.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Hand counted voting, with observers from all the major political parties, but for sure Dems and Reps.

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 02:12:21 PM

The shrewdest people and the slyest people aren't always the smartest people. We can see this from the fact that people like Klaus Schwab and Soros are strong proponents of freedom. They are attempting to use their freedom to take the freedom away from other people. But the signs of their slyness breaking down are evident in the ways that people are waking up to them. If they had only been gracious, and offered more freedom to the people, they would have been set up on pedestals by the people, forever. But now they are going to fail due to the ways they are going about things.

Is Biden holding campaigns with people from the public gathering to hear him talk? If he has, few people are coming to them. But loads of people are sounding off in favor of Trump. If the manipulations by the Dems are causing Trump to not get the votes he should be getting... that's election fraud.

-Well, the Trump fans are certainly not interested at all in making sure that biological laboratories are secure, so I do not care about them at all. The only thing that Trump has going for him is that he is up against Biden. And that is why we need instant runoff voting. And I will always vote for a third party candidate until we get instant runoff voting or something like that. People may call me a spoiler, but I call them morons for being completely incapable of understanding instant runoff voting.

P.S. People are so dumb that they do not even realize that instant runoff voting still works regardless of whether you understand it or not. And if people do not understand the inner workings, then that is better since they will vote sincerely instead of strategically.

Hooray. A voting system that is too complicated for anyone to understand will get people to vote sincerely. This is why we should make the voting algorithm needlessly complicated and convoluted. Maybe we can use AI with deterministic but pseudorandom training to decide the next election. Nobody will understand the inner workings, so everyone will vote sincerely.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 01:50:32 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 01:15:05 PM

You are somewhat correct. Where you are missing it is, the 'badness' and 'failure' of Trump is beauty and glory and great goodness when compared to what Biden has done.

This being the case, we can see why you might be having trouble with universities.

Btw, 'instant runoff' would only prove to the world that the people want Trump. The polls are showing it right now.

Cool

Um. I quit voluntarily to develop cryptocurrency technologies. After all, universities do not have anything to offer me besides threats of violence. But if you claim that people want Trump, then you need to provide evidence. And pretty much the only source of evidence that I will accept at the moment is the result of betting markets. And I just checked the betting markets and it looks like Trump is doing decently. But that is not on the condition that we have an instant runoff voting system. Did I find Donald Trump annoying back in 2016? Not that much. But now I do because both the idea of Donald Trump and Donald Trump himself are getting old.

But I have problems with universities because universities promote violence, and anyone who thinks differently is just a @#^$ face. Universities refuse to apologize, so I have no choice but to continually disparage them as much as is convenient for me to do so. No. Degrees from universities do not mean very much because universities refuse to apologize.

But your analysis that an instant runoff will show that people want Trump is flawed. The only way to get an instant runoff system is to have a more educated and intelligent populace, but do the smartest people love Trump? Nah.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

The shrewdest people and the slyest people aren't always the smartest people. We can see this from the fact that people like Klaus Schwab and Soros are strong proponents of freedom. They are attempting to use their freedom to take the freedom away from other people. But the signs of their slyness breaking down are evident in the ways that people are waking up to them. If they had only been gracious, and offered more freedom to the people, they would have been set up on pedestals by the people, forever. But now they are going to fail due to the ways they are going about things.

Is Biden holding campaigns with people from the public gathering to hear him talk? If he has, few people are coming to them. But loads of people are sounding off in favor of Trump. If the manipulations by the Dems are causing Trump to not get the votes he should be getting... that's election fraud.

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 01:15:05 PM

You are somewhat correct. Where you are missing it is, the 'badness' and 'failure' of Trump is beauty and glory and great goodness when compared to what Biden has done.

This being the case, we can see why you might be having trouble with universities.

Btw, 'instant runoff' would only prove to the world that the people want Trump. The polls are showing it right now.

Cool

Um. I quit voluntarily to develop cryptocurrency technologies. After all, universities do not have anything to offer me besides threats of violence. But if you claim that people want Trump, then you need to provide evidence. And pretty much the only source of evidence that I will accept at the moment is the result of betting markets. And I just checked the betting markets and it looks like Trump is doing decently. But that is not on the condition that we have an instant runoff voting system. Did I find Donald Trump annoying back in 2016? Not that much. But now I do because both the idea of Donald Trump and Donald Trump himself are getting old.

But I have problems with universities because universities promote violence, and anyone who thinks differently is just a @#^$ face. Universities refuse to apologize, so I have no choice but to continually disparage them as much as is convenient for me to do so. No. Degrees from universities do not mean very much because universities refuse to apologize.

But your analysis that an instant runoff will show that people want Trump is flawed. The only way to get an instant runoff system is to have a more educated and intelligent populace, but do the smartest people love Trump? Nah.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 01:04:42 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 12:48:21 PM

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 06:55:02 AM

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I agree. A person just wears himself out trying to spam for them. I mean, it's difficult to find any spam while telling their truths.

Cool

Well, I have heard too much of Donald Trump since about 2015, and I am not interested in him anymore. Donald Trump did not win the election. Donald Trump did not even build a wall. And the only reason we still talk about people like Donald Trump is that we do not have a ranked choice voting system with instant runoff. Unfortunately, the American people are not smart enough to understand something like instant runoff and why it is important, so we cannot have that. The lack of an instant runoff voting system is a sign of a lack of intelligence (and cryptocurrencies with mining algorithms that were never designed to advance science also signal a lack of intelligence; people would rather waste piles of energy than think).

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

You are somewhat correct. Where you are missing it is, the 'badness' and 'failure' of Trump is beauty and glory and great goodness when compared to what Biden has done.

This being the case, we can see why you might be having trouble with universities.

Btw, 'instant runoff' would only prove to the world that the people want Trump. The polls are showing it right now.

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

Quote from: BADecker on December 21, 2023, 12:48:21 PM

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 06:55:02 AM

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I agree. A person just wears himself out trying to spam for them. I mean, it's difficult to find any spam while telling their truths.

Cool

Well, I have heard too much of Donald Trump since about 2015, and I am not interested in him anymore. Donald Trump did not win the election. Donald Trump did not even build a wall. And the only reason we still talk about people like Donald Trump is that we do not have a ranked choice voting system with instant runoff. Unfortunately, the American people are not smart enough to understand something like instant runoff and why it is important, so we cannot have that. The lack of an instant runoff voting system is a sign of a lack of intelligence (and cryptocurrencies with mining algorithms that were never designed to advance science also signal a lack of intelligence; people would rather waste piles of energy than think).

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: jvanname on December 21, 2023, 06:55:02 AM

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I agree. A person just wears himself out trying to spam for them. I mean, it's difficult to find any spam while telling their truths.

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

I have view things on twitter. After all, some news and stuff can only be found on twitter. But I do not have an account, and probably never would get one.

I'm glad that Tucker Carlson started his own network - TCN - https://tuckercarlson.com/. It seems that he has set up at least some of his podcasts there that are not on twitter. This should ultimately make him more popular.

https://tuckercarlson.com/president-donald-trump/

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

I have respect for those who have never used Twitter. I also have respect for people who have been banned from Twitter. I also have respect for Dr Phillip Mason for constantly calling out Musk on his @#$%shit and managing to avoid a Twitter ban. But everyone else is a chlurmck.

Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: jvanname on December 18, 2023, 12:58:57 PM

I am proudly banned from Twitter. If you use Twitter and have not been banned, then I do not have any respect for you, and I consider you subhuman. By the way, the worship of Elon Musk is idolatry in every religion, so all the Musk worshippers need to be locked up.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

How do you feel about people who DON'T use twitter, and haven't been banned?

Cool

jvanname

member

Activity: 691

Merit: 51

I am proudly banned from Twitter. If you use Twitter and have not been banned, then I do not have any respect for you, and I consider you subhuman. By the way, the worship of Elon Musk is idolatry in every religion, so all the Musk worshippers need to be locked up.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: Hispo on December 17, 2023, 09:37:48 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 16, 2023, 12:41:45 PM

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

Cool

You must be joking. Most the things Jones and professional conspiracy theorists like him spread are completely fabricated "information" which they do not have any evidence of. It is not a matter of him being careful about saying thing he cannot provez otherwise he would not be able to say anything at all which appealed to his overage subscriber/viewer, it is about him continue to spread lies and devious conspiracy theories but ones which are not directly targeted against inviduals or organizations which could sue him again for defamation.

It is different to say parents are part of a cover up for a false massacre in a school, from saying the earth is flat or the government is spraying the sky with chemicals. Nobody will be able to sue Jones for saying Earth is flat (a planet cannot sue for defamation) and the government won't sue Jones because it would be ridiculous for them to do so for those allegations of them having aliens or whatever.

Also, Alex is not even willing to start paying to those families, hence he declared bankrupcy after years of accumulating millions of dollars from selling silver water to his followers.

You must be joking. Did you ever watch a Jones Infowars podcast? His desk is littered with the evidence and proof. Did you ever look into the evidence and proof? I didn't either.

Then Jones puts the wording of the evidence and proof right on the screen for everybody to see... including the location of the info in law and policy so that anybody can go look it up.

It's true that Jones stretches some of the info to mean some things that the info doesn't necessarily mean. But the other side is that he doesn't always explain how bad and damning some of the info really is. And, like everybody, he makes a mistake or two once in a while.

At least, Jones gets the info out there so that people can look at it for themselves if they have a mind to.

I don't want to remain totally ignorant of what is going on. Do you? Jones shows a lot of what we would never see otherwise.

Cool

Hispo

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 2025

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: BADecker on December 16, 2023, 12:41:45 PM

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

Cool

You must be joking. Most the things Jones and professional conspiracy theorists like him spread are completely fabricated "information" which they do not have any evidence of. It is not a matter of him being careful about saying thing he cannot provez otherwise he would not be able to say anything at all which appealed to his overage subscriber/viewer, it is about him continue to spread lies and devious conspiracy theories but ones which are not directly targeted against inviduals or organizations which could sue him again for defamation.

It is different to say parents are part of a cover up for a false massacre in a school, from saying the earth is flat or the government is spraying the sky with chemicals. Nobody will be able to sue Jones for saying Earth is flat (a planet cannot sue for defamation) and the government won't sue Jones because it would be ridiculous for them to do so for those allegations of them having aliens or whatever.

Also, Alex is not even willing to start paying to those families, hence he declared bankrupcy after years of accumulating millions of dollars from selling silver water to his followers.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

Cool

covfefe_

full member

Activity: 934

Merit: 105

Quote from: Hispo on December 15, 2023, 07:16:18 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 14, 2023, 11:42:57 AM

Quote from: Hispo on December 14, 2023, 06:08:37 AM

Quote from: DeathAngel on December 14, 2023, 03:41:12 AM

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

Cool

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

The thing you raised is discussed in the debate. Stupid people do say stupid things sometimes but it's upto the individuals to decide what is truth and what are lies.
When all of the government are feeding propaganda and the media are corrupted, they are causing much larger damage to the society which is incomparable to what a quack doctor may do to a gullible patient.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: Hispo on December 15, 2023, 07:16:18 PM

Quote from: BADecker on December 14, 2023, 11:42:57 AM

~

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

Cool

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

The trouble with your line of thought regarding Jones is, it was not Jones that damaged the parents. It was they, themselves. After all, they were the ones that induced their own feelings of pain by placing any stock in Jones's words. Since they DID place stock in his words, maybe Jones was right after all. They really need to go back to the psychiatrist for more self-control training.

Your whole line of thought should be applied to most Covid government officials and doctors, rather than Jones, who is helping to show the truth about the evil in the medical and government... even if he made a mistake about the school shootings.

Cool

Hispo

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 2025

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: BADecker on December 14, 2023, 11:42:57 AM

Quote from: Hispo on December 14, 2023, 06:08:37 AM

Quote from: DeathAngel on December 14, 2023, 03:41:12 AM

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

Cool

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1368

Quote from: Hispo on December 14, 2023, 06:08:37 AM

Quote from: DeathAngel on December 14, 2023, 03:41:12 AM

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

Cool

Hispo

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 2025

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: DeathAngel on December 14, 2023, 03:41:12 AM

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

Topic: BREAKING: Musk “Will Consider” Bringing Alex Jones Back on X... (Read 217 times)