I'd be sad if it wasn't London taking the hit...
I'm sure the area of the country with $20tr+ investment capital will find a way to bounce back though.
It's probably more worrying that the government continues to undeffund education and healthcare - so we're going to end up with a lot worse in the future.
UK gov was never getting anything from stock trading from canary wharf(tax avoidance) so the UK gov want to concentrate on the physical trade
after all why let finance guys trade micropennies day trading where canary wharf keep the loot. when the government can get 2%-15% by playing with physical trading at the freeports
eg america moving chicken into europe direct costs them import tax duties to europe. but if they loop it through a UK 'freeport' to process the chicken. eu would then accept the chicken at a UK lower rate
UK can then charge u.s a small middleman fee for the saving
right now though UK gov have to make it harder for companies to do this via normal ports. (hense the extra bureaucracy) to then incentivise foreign trade to use freeports instead.
its much like raising the bitcoin tx fee. delay transactions.. to get people to prefer to use LN.. yes it causes headaches at first because people just want to transact the way they did before but cant without costing more time/money
but hey in the end those using the other network will gain from it. while calling out the old way as near obsolete.
they are not interested in streamlining and improving the legacy methods. they just want to tweak the legacy methods to promote their new method.
its no coincidence that legacy ports are now harder to use whilst freeports are being created