Topic: Bryant Coleman's demography thread (Read 1884 times)

Demographics of Australia (2012).

Total Fertility Rate: 1.933 children per woman (1.917 in 2011). TFR is 2.710 for aborigines.

Total number of Births: 309,582 (+2.6%). 18,295 births to aborigine mothers.

Births, Country of birth of mother:

Total: 309,582 (TFR: 1.94)

Australia: 211,570 (1.95)
New Zealand: 9,828 (2.05)
North-West Europe: 13,239 (1.78)
Southern and Eastern Europe: 4,667 (1.56)
North Africa and the Middle East: 8,596 (3.04)
South-East Asia: 16,874 (1.66)
North-East Asia: 13,630 (1.47)
Southern and Central Asia: 17,038 (2.22)
Americas: 4,633 (1.66)
Sub-Saharan Africa: 6,116 (2.19)

Births, Country of birth of father:

Total: 309,582 (TPR: 1.93)

Australia: 200,971 (1.84)
New Zealand: 11,230 (2.07)
North-West Europe: 15,853 (1.75)
Southern and Eastern Europe: 4,550 (1.47)
North Africa and the Middle East: 10,158 (2.88)
South-East Asia: 12,970 (1.67)
North-East Asia: 10,668 (1.63)
Southern and Central Asia: 18,038 (1.97)
Americas: 4,436 (1.70)
Sub-Saharan Africa: 6,502 (2.31)

Total number of deaths (2012): 147,098   

Thailand and more SEA in general if you want to too.

I'm also interested in Croatia,Bosnia&Herzegovina and the United Kingdom (if there's time, Spain too)

Can you do Australia?

I guess some of that can be contributed to cultural differences between the Muslim Malay population and the Chinese and Indian populations.

Compared to the other world nations, 1.26% population growth per year is higher than average. For example, the same for the United States is 0.55% per year.

Out of 224 countries and territories, Malaysia is ranked 101 in terms of population growth.

But it has to be noted that most of the population growth is driven by the Malay (mostly-rural) population, while the minority population (Chinese, Indian) is growing only very slowly. If trends continue, within the next 20 or 30 years, Malaysia will become a more homogeneous country, with a large Malay majority.

Oh that makes sense then. I was thinking the births were citizens.


Is 1.26% natural population growth considered high or low?

I don't know much about demography but it's pretty interesting to see how populations develop.

Thanks a lot for the feedback.


It is not that simple.

1. The ethnic composition only takes the Citizens and Permanent Residents in to account. 3.3% of them don't belong to the Chinese, Malay or Indian ethnic groups. They are mostly Eurasian, Filipino, Indonesian and European.

2. The birth statistics on the other hand, are given for all the births in Singapore, including those to foreigner parents.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demographics for Malaysia (2012).

Crude Birth Rate: 17.2 per 1,000 (decline of 0.4 from 2011)
[CBR is 20.7 for ethnic Malays, 19.0 for other native, 12.7 for Chinese, 12.6 for Indians and 10.4 for others]

Total Fertility Rate: 2.118 child / woman.
[TFR is 2.667 for Malay, 2.319 for other native, 1.667 for Chinese, 1.503 for Indians and 0.988 for others]

Crude Death Rate: 4.6 per 1,000 (decline of 0.1 from 2011)
[CDR is 4.9 for Malays, 3.5 for other native, 5.6 for Chinese, 6.0 for Indians, and 1.6 for others]

Natural population growth: 1.26% per year (1.29% in 2011)
[NGR is 1.58% for Malays, 1.55% for other native, 0.71% for Chinese, 0.66% for Indians, and 0.88% for others]

Total live births: 508,774 (Malay - 306,506, ON - 66,080, Chinese- 82,796, Indians - 24,600 Others - 28,792)  
Total deaths: 136,836 (Malay - 72,346, ON - 12,161, Chinese- 36,304, Indians - 11,706 Others - 4,319)

I think the 12.5% of births coming from others while other's only make up 3.3% of the total population is interesting. If I were to guess I'd say Sri Lankans might make up a good part of those numbers.

edit: also making these individual posts is fine in my opinion because it makes it easier to quote the stats so we know exactly what we're discussing.

Name the nation here. I can get information for any country, as I have premium access to various demographic journals and archives. Actually I am working in the demography sector for the last 8 years.  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demography for Singapore (2013):

Total population: 5,312,400 (Singapore Citizens - 3,285,100; Singapore Permanent Residents - 533,100 & Foreigners - 1,494,200)

Total number of Births: 39,720 (-6.9%). 62.7% of the births are to ethnic Chinese, 13.8% to ethnic Malays, 11.0% to Indians, and 12.5% to others.
Total number of Deaths: 18,938 (+2.5%)

Natural population growth: 20,782 (24,182 in 2012).

Total Fertility Rate: 1.19 child per woman (1.29 in 2012)

Ethnic Composition (no change from 2012): Chinese: 74.2%, Malays: 13.3%, Indians: 9.2%, Others: 3.3%.

Do some non-European nations 

The fact remains that you are just jealous that I make more posts than you, while using the same sig campaign. If you have any problem with my posts, then you are free to press the Report to moderator button. Now the GTFO from here and don't waste my time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demography for Austria (2013):

Total number of Births: 79,330 (+0.5%)
Total number of Deaths: 79,526 (+0.1%)

Natural population growth: −196 (−1,158 in Jan-Apr 2013).

Biggest increases in Birth rate: Vienna (+2.3%), Salzburg (+2.0%), and Tyrol (+0.7%).
Biggest decreases in Birth rate: Vorarlberg (-2.3%), Burgenland (-2.0%), Lower Austria (-0.4%).

Biggest increases in Death rate: Salzburg (+4.6 %), Upper Austria (+3.6%), Vorarlberg (+1.9%).
Biggest decreases in Death rate: Burgenland (-2.5%), Styria (-1.9%), Lower Austria (-1.5%).

Okay, maybe I was harsh with the copy and paste job comment, but the point remains, making back-to-back posts on stats and posting pictures of World Cup 30 man and then 23 man squads is clearly dodgy.

I mean, why not compile a report and summarise in one or few posts, or link us to an external resource that you have created that gives us more information, should we choose to view it?

I'm not having a go at your other posts, they're good, but you have to ask yourself the question, would you be making these threads and filling them with many, many singular responses if you weren't on a signature campaign?

That's all I have to say on the matter.

Then how about you merge your posts?

Everybody will be happy and if there is indeed somebody interested in those statistics they will find them easily , not spread over 20 pages ?



 

Don't get jealous, and I am not copy pasting anything. I am doing serious research and posting the information here. Much better than your spam. So GTFO from my thread and don't hang here to improve your post count.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demography for Estonia (January-April 2014):

Total number of Births: 4,266 (-6.3%)
Total number of Deaths: 5,436 (-4.8%)

Natural population growth: −1,170 (−1,158 in Jan-Apr 2013).

This thread is another extension to the Bryant Coleman post-a-thon empire. Serious copy and paste job going down here.

Church.

Quality of life and income.
See, where in Ukraine is greatest Iodine deficiency 

What this has to do with demography?

---------------------------------------------------------------
Demography for Lithuania (January-May 2014):

Total number of Births: 11,922 (-2.2%)
Total number of Deaths: 17,231 (-8.6%)

Natural population growth: −5,309 (−6,657 in Jan-May 2013).

Check better https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodine_deficiency

Demography for Latvia (January-April 2014):

Total number of Births: 6,813 (+4.3%)
Total number of Deaths: 9,784 (-10.8%)

Natural population growth: −2,971 (−4,440 in Jan-Apr 2013).