Topic: [BTC] $1,183.20 Amazon Balance [BTC] [MINERS CAN BUY EQP!] - page 2. (Read 5993 times)
im asking so we all know if he will do escrow or not. you said to ask him right? just trying to be direct.
Blazr, thank you for posting the risks in a non-accusatory manner. That's more of what I want to see.
I think it's a little late for that. I doubt he will even want to do business with you now.
You should have asked him if he was willing to take escrow.
If he's not willing to take escrow, THEN you can pull out your pitchforks.
liberty payout, will you do escrow?If he's not willing to take escrow, THEN you can pull out your pitchforks.
"We" Does not constitute 3 users
google search define we. we can be used even if its only one other person your referring to.You should have asked him if he was willing to take escrow.
If he's not willing to take escrow, THEN you can pull out your pitchforks.
liberty payout, will you do escrow? If he's not willing to take escrow, THEN you can pull out your pitchforks.
I also wonder why folks don't use escrow, even when handed to them on a silver platter with no fees. Seriously guys, if your cash flow is that bad, you have no business being in business!
im not the only one who is suspicious so i think "we" is appropriate. to be honest, i only jumped in cause he talked down to me even though i have more rep than him.
"We" Does not constitute 3 users
im not the only one who is suspicious so i think "we" is appropriate. to be honest, i only jumped in cause he talked down to me when i have more rep than him.
You should have asked him if he was willing to take escrow. I have more rep than you, and yet I'd still be just fine with using escrow.Escrow, escrow, escrow. That's the word of the day, folks. Use it. If he's not willing to take escrow, THEN you can pull out your pitchforks.
im not the only one who is suspicious so i think "we" is appropriate. to be honest, i only jumped in cause he talked down to me even though i have more rep than him.
I swear what I encountered so far was very similar to hazing.
Yeah, that's exactly what it was. It's really getting irritating, though, since it seems that they are doing it more to legitimate users and not to the actual scammers. It's only been, like, 50% effective.I have no problem with people informing people who may not have been around to see other scams what the risks with a certain trade could be. You really cross the line when you start putting out baseless accusations, however.
Edit: Based on IP evidence, we have no reason to believe that this is newdude.
Thanks, that's reassuring.
Good luck in your future ventures Liberty Payout. Hopefully you and whomever you deal with will be able to come to a better understanding over what identity verification is required.
BTC guy, please do not use "we". Take responsibility for and make statements about your own actions, not the actions of others.
it is like hazing. dont take it personal. we have good reasons for being suspicious. prove us wrong and carry on or go home.
But if you're just going to manufacture fake evidence by telling someone that they can censor something and then call them out for that censorship, that's not cool.
In all seriousness what he provided was not what was asked for at all, I can't even read any of his ID on one of my monitors because the backlight is slightly dim (normally unnoticable).
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
Amen. Thank you sir, after reading this I was relieved that this forum is not full of jackasses. I swear what I encountered so far was very similar to hazing. Thank you once again.
come again
Thanks for dropping by 
It's exactly what was asked for. Cut it out with this bullshit.
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
If the name on those pictures matched the amazon account and you wanted to buy his Amazon balance, would you accept those pictures as proof of ID? I personally wouldn't.
Anyways, I'm staying out of this from now on.
Thank you. I swear, this forum is turning into a witch-hunt.Edit: Based on IP evidence, we have no reason to believe that this is newdude.
ship first or go home
It's exactly what was asked for. Cut it out with this bullshit.
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
If the name on those pictures matched the amazon account and you wanted to buy his Amazon balance, would you accept those pictures as proof of ID? I personally wouldn't.
Anyways, I'm staying out of this from now on.
But if you're just going to manufacture fake evidence by telling someone that they can censor something and then call them out for that censorship, that's not cool.
In all seriousness what he provided was not what was asked for at all, I can't even read any of his ID on one of my monitors because the backlight is slightly dim (normally unnoticable).
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
+1 Maged
Ask nicely and you will get what you ask for.
But if you're just going to manufacture fake evidence by telling someone that they can censor something and then call them out for that censorship, that's not cool.
In all seriousness what he provided was not what was asked for at all, I can't even read any of his ID on one of my monitors because the backlight is slightly dim (normally unnoticable).
An ID that doesn't show the name on the Amazon account proves absolutely nothing, either way. If you want to ask for evidence, ask for something with that name on it.
no way
Wow...
Jump to: