Time to deconstruct the incorrect information which the majority of people on this thread are giving.
What do you think those miners will do once they start poping BCC blocks? Hold them like bitcoins?
Miners have to convert to fiat from Bitcoin to pay their electricity costs and other expenses. Sure, they hold some, but it's important to sell a significant amount. That doesn't crash the price and with BCH/BTC trading volume it's not particularly important.
How do you think BCC miners will pay their operational expenses?
BCH mining is currently significantly
more profitable than BTC mining. We'll find out how this changes after the next difficulty adjustment.
I have a pending BTC transfer from Bittrex to Coinbase that is now 3 hours old and still not verified.
BCH and BTC blocks are aimed to be mined at the same rate (ten minutes). While BCH blocks are being mined faster for now (as it's more profitable), this does not
necessarily continue, and it's unlikely that it will be significant in a few weeks' time. The BTC network is congested, which makes it Bittrex's responsibility to set an appropriate fee and get your transaction confirmed faster. The hash rate on the BTC chain versus BCH chain is not what's stopping your transaction from being confirmed.
I have a pending BTC transfer from Bittrex to Coinbase that is now 3 hours old and still not verified. This leaves a fairly large window of risk where I am not able to liquidate the BTC. 3 hours is a long time in BTC price world. This is 2.5 times longer than my previous longest. The fee was quite substantial as well. Definitely got my attention.
Took long enough to get your attention. Some people are a bit slower than others. Soon, everyone will figure it out.
I'm wondering why it takes more time than the schedule, why segwit not activated yet?
For SegWit to be activated, 95% of the blocks in a difficulty period (1916 out of 2016 blocks, this is approximately two weeks) have to signal for BIP 141. This has happened. After that happens, there is
another 2016-block difficulty period as a "grace period" of sorts for old clients to upgrade, then SegWit activates.
To be precise, SegWit will be activated at the end of this difficulty period (as of this post, 203 blocks from now).
Besides a little more security on the BCH chain because of the hashrate, there is nothing to worry about. The longest chain means nothing.
You fools keep repeating this lie.
In this scenario, he is objectively correct as the "longest chain" would only be caused by a sudden increase in hashrate on the BCH chain and not by more hashrate being on the BCH chain overall. The longest chain in this situation doesn't say anything about which chain has more support.
If you can provide an argument opposing this without ad hominems, I'm listening.