BTC-e is an Internet black hole | Bitcointalksearch.org

exocytosis

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: phlogistonq on March 02, 2014, 06:54:22 PM

Quote from: BittBurger on March 01, 2014, 09:54:37 PM

OHHHHHH thats right, you're not a normal person who believes in Bitcoin. You're trying to play the system and make a quick buck. So you *have* to have your coins sitting on the exchange, or you'll miss out on the dips!

If it wasn't for people selling and buying, how would the price get set?

The vast majority of people on these forums seem to think that Bitcoin can achieve "world domination" and go "to the moon" by being locked up in cold storage. They believe Bitcoin will somehow magically undermine the entire banking system of the world -- by sitting in fireproof safes in the form of paperwallets and encrypted thumbdrives that've never been online.

No wonder less than 0.1 % of the world's population have even heard of Bitcoin. The geeks are hellbent on making it stay that way, hence all the hatred spewed on everyone doing trading or using BTC as a means of exchange.

phlogistonq

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Quote from: BittBurger on March 01, 2014, 09:54:37 PM

OHHHHHH thats right, you're not a normal person who believes in Bitcoin. You're trying to play the system and make a quick buck. So you *have* to have your coins sitting on the exchange, or you'll miss out on the dips!

If it wasn't for people selling and buying, how would the price get set?

Ollie

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 10

Now that freezing of capital and an embargo against Russia has been hinted by US government, did it occur to anyone that BTC-E might be affected? Also, if BTC-E indeed is registered in Cyprus, did their bank accounts also get emptied by the government bail-in? Shocked

leopard2

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1014

Quote from: exocytosis on March 02, 2014, 10:31:57 AM

Quote from: Cluster2k on March 02, 2014, 09:38:58 AM

After the MtGox debacle there have been many suggestions that people who keep bitcoins or cash with third parties almost deserve to lose their fortune. How messed up is that? Bitcoin is meant to be easier to use and with more freedom than traditional money. If we require businesses to transfer bitcoins to computers without regular internet connections or paper wallets, how is that achieving the goal of facilitating more people to use bitcoin?

Exactly! Finally someone who understands this. I've been trying to get this point across numerous times. I even mentioned it earlier in this thread. But most hardcore bitcoiners seem to hate the idea of Bitcoin going mainstream. If every Bitcoin user has to store all their coins in paper wallets or in the form of QR-code engraved rocks or metal bars locked down in unbreakable safes, then how is that going to facilitate a healthy economy and liquid circulation of BTC?

I thought BTC was supposed to be "the money of the internet", an easy, fast and reliable way to do trade across borders.

huh? Pardon me?

if you own a lot of fiat, do you have all that in your checking account? Or carry it in your wallet, as cash?

Cold storage is very reasonable as long as you don't lose it; and there are things like Bitsimple.

Your post is silly; just like saying, buying a government bond or using a credit card instead of cash, is bad for liquid circulation of USD.

richmke

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Cluster2k on March 02, 2014, 09:53:03 AM

The people on this forum were mostly aware, and still managed to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars, sometimes more. MtGox touted itself as a super way to add bitcoin functionality to your business. I doubt "everyone" in the business community who used MtGox's service was aware, and accepted, the risk they could one day disappear and take all the funds down with it.

When MtGox slowed down in their processing of fiat, that should have been a big red flag.

Quote

How is that a superior form of doing business than with traditional banks?

That's the point: It is not superior if you don't get the guarantees of doing business with a regulated bank.

exocytosis

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Cluster2k on March 02, 2014, 09:38:58 AM

After the MtGox debacle there have been many suggestions that people who keep bitcoins or cash with third parties almost deserve to lose their fortune. How messed up is that? Bitcoin is meant to be easier to use and with more freedom than traditional money. If we require businesses to transfer bitcoins to computers without regular internet connections or paper wallets, how is that achieving the goal of facilitating more people to use bitcoin?

Exactly! Finally someone who understands this. I've been trying to get this point across numerous times. I even mentioned it earlier in this thread. But most hardcore bitcoiners seem to hate the idea of Bitcoin going mainstream. If every Bitcoin user has to store all their coins in paper wallets or in the form of QR-code engraved rocks or metal bars locked down in unbreakable safes, then how is that going to facilitate a healthy economy and liquid circulation of BTC?

I thought BTC was supposed to be "the money of the internet", an easy, fast and reliable way to do trade across borders.

Cluster2k

legendary

Activity: 1692

Merit: 1018

Quote from: richmke on March 02, 2014, 09:44:06 AM

Quote from: Cluster2k on March 02, 2014, 09:38:58 AM

MtGox has done more damage to bitcoin than many people yet realise.

I think MtGox only highlighted the risks that everyone already knew. Go with an unregulated exchange, and buyer beware.

The people on this forum were mostly aware, and still managed to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars, sometimes more. MtGox touted itself as a super way to add bitcoin functionality to your business. I doubt "everyone" in the business community who used MtGox's service was aware, and accepted, the risk they could one day disappear and take all the funds down with it. How is that a superior form of doing business than with traditional banks?

Quote from: richmke on March 02, 2014, 09:44:06 AM

People confuse regulation of BTC and regulation of the exchanges. You want regulation of exchanges so things like MtGox do not happen.

Which brings us to the next point. Which government's domain does BTC-e exist in? There are suggestions of Cyprus, Bulgaria, and even Russia. Big differences between the three. Who is the auditor for BTC-e? We could start with a simple question: who is the owner?

richmke

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Cluster2k on March 02, 2014, 09:38:58 AM

MtGox has done more damage to bitcoin than many people yet realise.

I think MtGox only highlighted the risks that everyone already knew. Go with an unregulated exchange, and buyer beware.

People confuse regulation of BTC and regulation of the exchanges. You want regulation of exchanges so things like MtGox do not happen.

Cluster2k

legendary

Activity: 1692

Merit: 1018

After the MtGox debacle there have been many suggestions that people who keep bitcoins or cash with third parties almost deserve to lose their fortune. How messed up is that? Bitcoin is meant to be easier to use and with more freedom than traditional money. If we require businesses to transfer bitcoins to computers without regular internet connections or paper wallets, how is that achieving the goal of facilitating more people to use bitcoin?

To get around the often wild fluctuations in bitcoin's value, people have suggested instantly converting bitcoins to cash and back again via exchanges so that the business doesn't carry the commodity value risk. That's hardly doable when the parallel suggestion is to not keep any bitcoins or money in exchanges in places like Bulgaria to avoid the counter party risk.

MtGox has done more damage to bitcoin than many people yet realise.

cozytrade

sr. member

Activity: 1097

Merit: 310

Seabet.io | Crypto-Casino

The first one is proposal to use DWOLLA for bitstamp
The second one is bank decision, rather than bitstamp

Of course I did not see bitstamp makes excuses in both case. Could you give us specific articles rather than keywords?

In either case, what is MtGox behaviour? In some part MtGox has been better than bitstamp or btc-e especially in terms of their anonymity. I have not see any similarity regarding withdrawal issue yet, though btc-e has deposit issue. However, there are risk in any exchange that is it.

Quote from: bananas on March 01, 2014, 07:41:19 PM

Quote from: Astro on March 01, 2014, 07:29:17 PM

Quote from: bananas on March 01, 2014, 07:27:53 PM

Quote from: jztxeno on March 01, 2014, 07:24:44 PM

Quote from: bananas on March 01, 2014, 07:12:04 PM

And Bitstamp is behaving exactly like Mt. Gox in a smaller scale.

Oh man stop spreading bullshit around..

There is no BS, real facts. Many reports of BTC being put on hold under false excuses, do your reasearch.

Link those "reports" or shut the hell up with your FUD.

https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=bitstamp+holding+funds&oq=bitstamp+holding+funds

https://www.google.com/search?q=bitstamp+frozen+account&oq=bitstamp+frozen+account

and so on, just introduce different related keywords

fcmatt

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1001

Quote from: tokeweed on March 02, 2014, 12:39:31 AM

Quote from: Trance on March 01, 2014, 07:30:58 PM

I was also scammed by BTCE- "selective scamming" is a horrible problem!

it would help to tell us more about it.

thanks.

I can recall reading a half dozen posts on this forum where users have lost money when using btc-e. But are they honest posts or lies i am not sure. I tend to use btc-e in the fastest manner possible. Get in and out. That is it. No problems so far.

Stevenrm87

sr. member

Activity: 403

Merit: 250

Just wanted to say, Ive never had any problems with BTC-E. A-OK in my book

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1403

Life, Love and Laughter...

Quote from: Trance on March 01, 2014, 07:30:58 PM

I was also scammed by BTCE- "selective scamming" is a horrible problem!

it would help to tell us more about it.

thanks.

Unacceptable

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1001

Quote from: exocytosis on March 01, 2014, 09:51:11 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on March 01, 2014, 07:40:50 PM

DO NOT KEEP BTC IN AN EXCHANGE!!! Unless your willing to lose it!!!

Indeed. All BTC owners should actually lock down all of their coins in permanent cold storage. Forever. That's the only truly safe way to store them.

And when absolutely all BTC are locked away in cold storage, I'm sure the BTC price will skyrocket ... And BTC will go mainstream, since it's so easy and convenient for the Average Joe to use printed paper wallets when doing purchases and paying taxes ... Roll Eyes

Just keep em on your PC in a real wallet,YOU CONTROL!!!! A PC that DOES NOT surf the net & can pick up virus's....I know it won't make you a lot of BTC,but you can be sure they'll be there when you need em Cool

jubalix

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1022

newb

being anon is a strength of BTC-e

anhows only trade with fractions of your total, and take out any excess regally = minimise loss on any btc exchange

BittBurger

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1001

Yeah I agree, why does anyone stress about any exchanges?

You're supposed to immediately withdraw your coins to a local or offline wallet.

OHHHHHH thats right, you're not a normal person who believes in Bitcoin. You're trying to play the system and make a quick buck. So you *have* to have your coins sitting on the exchange, or you'll miss out on the dips!

Considering its *you guys* making the price of BTC so volatile, and contributing to its bad reputation, and making its success that much more difficult, I ... really dont feel bad for you.

Leave your coins on the exchange, and don't complain if another one loses all your money.

-B-

exocytosis

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Unacceptable on March 01, 2014, 07:40:50 PM

DO NOT KEEP BTC IN AN EXCHANGE!!! Unless your willing to lose it!!!

Indeed. All BTC owners should actually lock down all of their coins in permanent cold storage. Forever. That's the only truly safe way to store them.

And when absolutely all BTC are locked away in cold storage, I'm sure the BTC price will skyrocket ... And BTC will go mainstream, since it's so easy and convenient for the Average Joe to use printed paper wallets when doing purchases and paying taxes ... Roll Eyes

cloverme

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1054

SpacePirate.io

I didn't get too far myself with BTC-E, I use them to exchange LTC and NMC into BTC, but that's it. Support is all russian, so it's a little difficult on that end of thing. You used to be able to chat for free, now you have to carry a balance to chat... meh. I don't think they are any better than Gox to be honest, but that's just my opinion.

Nathonas

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Knowledge is Power

I think its healthy to question the safety of other exchanges after the Gox fiasco but I don't have much negative to say about BTC-E or Stamp, and I haven't seen much negative press about them. Of course I would limit the time that my coins spend inside any exchange before or after what happened at Gox, but I think its unfair to start a witch hunt on these reliable exchanges.

btbrae

hero member

Activity: 680

Merit: 500

Quote from: bananas on March 01, 2014, 07:41:19 PM

https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=bitstamp+holding+funds&oq=bitstamp+holding+funds

https://www.google.com/search?q=bitstamp+frozen+account&oq=bitstamp+frozen+account

and so on, just introduce different related keywords

There is nothing of substance in those links. Bitstamp is running fine right now. What is your problem?

Topic: BTC-e is an Internet black hole (Read 3188 times)