Topic: btc.com vs. Slushpool - page 2. (Read 668 times)
Fees Are 4% on btc.com
Pros: BTC.Com - lower fees (1.5% vs. 2%), FPPS (daily payouts)
Cons: BTC.Com - owned by Bitmain, operated out of China, FAQ is typical "Chinglish"
Pros: Slushpool - great user interface
Cons: Higher fees, higher variance
From a business perspective, where I need to maximize profit and politics aside, why wouldn't I want to mine at BTC.com?
ps. Running a ~1.6PH farm and need regular income to pay over $10K/month/USD electric bills, so simply can't afford to "ramp up" on any smaller PPLNS pool, even if they have lower fees. Although not really a daily decision, mining profits are marginal enough that profit is checked daily to make sure price and difficulty are still in line. Mined with this farm from November 2017 to November 2018, hibernating until April 2019. Now watching things closely.
Cons: BTC.Com - owned by Bitmain, operated out of China, FAQ is typical "Chinglish"
Pros: Slushpool - great user interface
Cons: Higher fees, higher variance
From a business perspective, where I need to maximize profit and politics aside, why wouldn't I want to mine at BTC.com?
ps. Running a ~1.6PH farm and need regular income to pay over $10K/month/USD electric bills, so simply can't afford to "ramp up" on any smaller PPLNS pool, even if they have lower fees. Although not really a daily decision, mining profits are marginal enough that profit is checked daily to make sure price and difficulty are still in line. Mined with this farm from November 2017 to November 2018, hibernating until April 2019. Now watching things closely.
Jump to: