Yes, and you can lose again 10 more times after and lose again, you can't beat the house's edge.
I do not test it, is math you can't beat the math.
Your example with the double is wrong.
First of all, if you double 4 times you will have (assuming 1% edge) and 100$ bet
Game 1 capital 100
100*(2-1%(100))=199
Game 2 capital 199
100*(2-1%(100))=199
Game 3 capital 199+99=298
100*(2-1%(100))=199
Game 4 capital 298+99=397
100*(2-1%(100))=199
Final capital 496
Now if you lose 4 times in a row you will get 496-400= 96$. You seem to forget always the house's edge (and the cashout fee since you says to cash out every single winning)
And you are not breakeven.
If you talk about the double bet on loss to get a bigger win after you lose(bet 1 100 lose, bet 2 200 lose, bet 3 400 lose, bet 4 800 win, final win +100) is an old and known method and it will not work since casinos are not stupid and use a cap on the bet to avoid this.
What others people think about it?
YYou totally don’t understand how our strategy works, our platform give you the bets to be executed in the casino and when this session end our platform will notify the client as session end and the client will had break even or make 0-1% of the capital the same process will repeat until the user had double the capital to cash out the winning and repeat..
I understand you are doing your work but its not good to hurt a business reputation without any proof..
IF you want use to fail good for you, but until you show a proof of evidence that our platform doesn’t work it will only be your prejudgment and nothing more.
i will repeat a prejudgment is not an ethical and fair way to review a business, please test our service or delete your review.
I’m giving you a free 1 week membership isn't it enough?