Join team A (1 BTC income fee)
Join team B (0.5 BTC income fee)
Join team C (0.1 BTC income fee)
Join team C (0.1 BTC income fee)
Join team D (0.05 BTC income fee)
Join team D (0.05 BTC income fee)
Join team D (0.05 BTC income fee)
OP I like the idea - as it is more like MLM akin to Amway / Usana than a ponzi.
If someone thinks they can get someone to sign up - that new person goes directly under them using their personal link rather than just into a greater pool. So it benefits that person for doing the work / marketing directly to get new people.
But can you explain how you are going to deal with the situation described below. It only affects a few, but knowing would be good.
Situation: There were are few lucky people that 'won' the initial referrals. Say Join team C (0.1 BTC income fee) - These are the top level right?
You say that payments will be made as per the following table, and that only 10% of the incoming goes to the system.
When new member joins team and pay incomer fee, the amount of incomer fee divided between his upper level referrals with given proportions:
Level 1: 60% of incomer fee;
Level 2: 10% of incomer fee;
Level 3: 10% of incomer fee;
Level 4: 5% of incomer fee;
Level 5: 5% of incomer fee;
10% of incomer fee goes to system for giving you opportunity to earn BTC with your referrals.
So if someone sends 0.1 btc to the Team C link http://btcup.net/?r=14jH1q2SYNFMGsQFKMuibW9kztPWzeVwNQ - the owner of that position gets 60% of the incoming 0.1btc, and the system gets 10% - So who gets the remaining 30%??
As there are no levels 2 - 5 at this stage - 30% is unaccounted for based on your explanation above.
Similarly, 20% is accounted for at the level 2 stage and so on. Your table is only valid where there is a full 5 levels.
I'm just hoping that the 1st participants incoming fee isn't 60% to that address owner and 40% to the 'system'.
Thanks