When the fork happens price will drop dramatically. This will be a great buy opportunity before BU maintains dominance and the price skyrockets, which would have already happened naturally if Bankerstream Core hadn't restricted the blocksize to 1mb for so long.
Really we should all be thanking Core for keeping the price down for so long, honestly. If you like accumulating cheap coins that is.
Topic: BTU will become BTC -- face these facts or get left behind - page 2. (Read 1810 times)
Sez You.
OK, Mr Professional-googler. please point me at some evidence supporting your claims.
OK, Mr Professional-googler. please point me at some evidence supporting your claims.
Evidence or Support for your uninformed opinion presented as if its Fact ?
Oh, none... unsurprising
Oh, none... unsurprising
Called having vision and being a forward thinker.
Also you can read all about BTU and you should already be well-informed of the BTC issues by now. You are on these forums, so that is a great start.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 278
Bitcoin :open immutable decentralized global fair
@ProfessionalGoogler
It appears you may want to change Bitcoin slightly into something that it isn't?
I wonder what your opinions would be on a post I put up not too long ago titled: Hacks & puppets & forks - how to destroy bitcoin: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18256120
You've received a bit of a speculative reaction so far.
Interesting, no?
It appears you may want to change Bitcoin slightly into something that it isn't?
I wonder what your opinions would be on a post I put up not too long ago titled: Hacks & puppets & forks - how to destroy bitcoin: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18256120
You've received a bit of a speculative reaction so far.
Interesting, no?
Sez You.
OK, Mr Professional-googler. please point me at some evidence supporting your claims.
OK, Mr Professional-googler. please point me at some evidence supporting your claims.
I know more about Bitcoin that you might realise. Ive been here since early 2011.. (under another name) and seen plenty of self-proclaimed experts "with vision" predicting plenty of things that never happened.
So "think-forwards" all you like, it doesnt change the *fact that most exchanges have already agreed that BU will be an alt-coin
Your unsupported opinion contradicts proven facts and therefore has no validity.
Whether or not BU is needed, or even if it is the correct solution is irrelevant..
the BU team is trying to *force the adoption of their solution by weight of hashing power and therefore fails to garner my support.
So "think-forwards" all you like, it doesnt change the *fact that most exchanges have already agreed that BU will be an alt-coin
Your unsupported opinion contradicts proven facts and therefore has no validity.
Whether or not BU is needed, or even if it is the correct solution is irrelevant..
the BU team is trying to *force the adoption of their solution by weight of hashing power and therefore fails to garner my support.
Man you sure do need to read.
I know more about Bitcoin that you might realise. Ive been here since early 2011.. (under another name) and seen plenty of self-proclaimed experts "with vision" predicting plenty of things that never happened.
So "think-forwards" all you like, it doesnt change the *fact that most exchanges have already agreed that BU will be an alt-coin
Your unsupported opinion contradicts proven facts and therefore has no validity.
Whether or not BU is needed, or even if it is the correct solution is irrelevant..
the BU team is trying to *force the adoption of their solution by weight of hashing power and therefore fails to garner my support.
So "think-forwards" all you like, it doesnt change the *fact that most exchanges have already agreed that BU will be an alt-coin
Your unsupported opinion contradicts proven facts and therefore has no validity.
Whether or not BU is needed, or even if it is the correct solution is irrelevant..
the BU team is trying to *force the adoption of their solution by weight of hashing power and therefore fails to garner my support.
BTU allows larger block sizes, correct?
As time goes one the Bitocoin blockchain will need to accommodate greater volume of transactions and greater size of transactions. What's so scary about this inevitable future that people are afraid to make the leap today?
As time goes one the Bitocoin blockchain will need to accommodate greater volume of transactions and greater size of transactions. What's so scary about this inevitable future that people are afraid to make the leap today?
Evidence or Support for your uninformed opinion presented as if its Fact ?
Oh, none... unsurprising
Oh, none... unsurprising
Called having vision and being a forward thinker.
Also you can read all about BTU and you should already be well-informed of the BTC issues by now. You are on these forums, so that is a great start.
Evidence or Support for your uninformed opinion presented as if its Fact ?
Oh, none... unsurprising
Oh, none... unsurprising
People laughed at me when I said litecoin and ripple was trash and that Ethereum would be a alt coin major exchanges adapt.
Not sure why anyone would be against BTU but you better bet it WILL be BTC, trying to make it an "alt coin" is idiotic, period.
Bitcoin is about the FUTURE and needs to constantly change/adapt -- not stay an old grandpa who gives old used washed up bad advice.
Please get with the times people, and stop trying to live in the past.
Not sure why anyone would be against BTU but you better bet it WILL be BTC, trying to make it an "alt coin" is idiotic, period.
Bitcoin is about the FUTURE and needs to constantly change/adapt -- not stay an old grandpa who gives old used washed up bad advice.
Please get with the times people, and stop trying to live in the past.
Jump to: