'Bubble' might not be accurate, since we don't have the massive upward spikes ($4+ the same hour) that we had in early June 2011.
Very Short-term: We have had several dramatic, 'healthy' corrections.
Medium-term: We are way over-due for a (temporary) big dive, and the longer it's put off, then the more massive it will be.
Ah man, you were so close to actually being right and then you got to that last sentence...
so 9 consecutive weekly green candles (>2 months) is perfectly normal and sustainable?
Sure. 90, meeehhhh. But 9? Sure.
And I like how you even went with weekly candles. You just zoomed out until you found a metric you didn't like and decided, "Yup! There's mah proofs!" Way to cherry pick.
thanks for projecting motives. i really appreciate the fair and open discussion. when did you lose so much respect for me that you can't even take a single one of my points seriously?
but anyway,
say i did exactly what you said. say i'm cherry-picking. JUST SAY --
you still need to account for it. every scale is valid and price movement patterns appear on every scale. the fact that we haven't seen a weekly-sized correction in 9 consecutive weeks
is a big deal. and if you don't think it is, you don't know enough about markets. screw that, you don't know enough about historical bitcoin price data.
let me put this into perspective. the
only time ever that there have been 9 or more consecutive green weekly candles was during the run-up to the pirate bubble. this is not 'normal', and it's not necessarily bearish, but you didn't even
respond to the damn point.
also, i'm pretty damn close to ignoring you, which would make you the first person to ever have that honor. you side-step every single point i make in every single thread, all the while treating me like im the most worthless poster on this forum. that's not discussion, and you need to step off.
edit:
btw, this is the problem:
Ah man, you were so close to actually being right and then you got to that last sentence...
"right" and "what i already believe" are not always equivalent. watch out for that.