There doesn’t appear to be any policy in place removing merit.
Sure about that?Well I am glad I have your assurance it is ok. I am sure this will not be abuse like every other tool he has created relating to trust.
Topic: [Bug forum?] Name: Giratina, Merit: -1926 (Read 576 times)
Well I am glad I have your assurance it is ok. I am sure this will not be abuse like every other tool he has created relating to trust.
There doesn’t appear to be any policy in place removing merit.
Sure about that?There doesn’t appear to be any policy in place removing merit.
Sure about that? 
Whenever theymos “demerits” someone, there will be a -X merit comming from “Bitcointalk forum” in the user’s merit history. And he only does that in some specific cases of merit abuse.
Just what we need, more back door shady ways to decimate people's accounts with zero public accountability. I am sure nothing bad will result from this...
This was a bug....and has been corrected. There doesn’t appear to be any policy in place removing merit. That's a bug.
The merit number is a cached value derived from the merit ledger. I think that the number got out of sync and weird here due to a bug which existed for a short time last week. The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
The merit number is a cached value derived from the merit ledger. I think that the number got out of sync and weird here due to a bug which existed for a short time last week. The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
Just what we need, more back door shady ways to decimate people's accounts with zero public accountability. I am sure nothing bad will result from this...
The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
~snip~
The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
It looks like the bug has corrected itself,even without any merit received for that user.Now the user has 2 merits but still the rank didn't changed to Jr.Member,might be an another bug.
Thanks, theymos.
Okay, I'm wrong about the report to admin function, which is unrelated. But, kind of strange coincidence that I reported that PM and he/she is the only user with that kind of –merit.
Seeing someone honestly admit s/he is wrong is kind of positive as a person in you @theyoung. You might have triggered the negative merit of Giratina bug. S/he was jr. 2 weeks ago and you got online January 28,2019 which is to weeks ago, assuming you reported it when you got back, & just a thought theymos, cyrus, hilariuos, mpep & smallrick. one might have click a button on it. Ain't sure though. Okay, I'm wrong about the report to admin function, which is unrelated. But, kind of strange coincidence that I reported that PM and he/she is the only user with that kind of –merit.
Don't get me wrong just a fan.
That's a bug.
Thank you for clarification theymos 
Please can you also solve one more such mystery here. I think its too a bug. But you clarification will matter. (The different thing here is the accounts are registered in 2018)
Theymos, can you solve the mystery? newbies with 2 merit watering avatar?
sr. member
Activity: 375
Merit: 1021
Just in case no one loves you, I love you 3000.
That's a bug.
Thanks, theymos.Okay, I'm wrong about the report to admin function, which is unrelated. But, kind of strange coincidence that I reported that PM and he/she is the only user with that kind of –merit.
So the issue has been manually corrected, and the account displaying correctly. It's surprising the account owner did not make a complaint personally.
This gives an idea of what the admins can actually do with merit and possible demerit features. We would probably never get any of the latter.
This gives an idea of what the admins can actually do with merit and possible demerit features. We would probably never get any of the latter.
That's a bug.
The merit number is a cached value derived from the merit ledger. I think that the number got out of sync and weird here due to a bug which existed for a short time last week. The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
The merit number is a cached value derived from the merit ledger. I think that the number got out of sync and weird here due to a bug which existed for a short time last week. The number would've corrected itself the next time this user received any merit.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 4133
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
Why wait for theymos when we can experiment on the account and come out with some hypothesis. If this user owns a demerited account that means every merit you send to user gets deducted from what he is owing the forum so lets say you sent him 1 merit (for any quality post he has made before) and the merit number reduced to -1925 that means it's a demerited account but if the merit increase to -1927 it means that's just another bug on forum.
Would had done the experiment myself but don't have smerit to spare. You know, demerit system might contribute even more in the fight against low quality posting. Just saying,,.
Would had done the experiment myself but don't have smerit to spare. You know, demerit system might contribute even more in the fight against low quality posting. Just saying,,.
He was buying merits and you reported him... Right?
So that got him demerited?
If that's the case, I'm curious what made Admin take away 1928 Merit from a user who had only 2. And if it's a punishment for spamming, why not just ban the user? So that got him demerited?
It is pretty weird to see negative merits on someone's profile. Of course it is a bug as there is nothing like negative merits applied until now by theymos.
Also the user Giratina has not posted anything from Aug 15, 2018, which points that it is nothing intentional or something like a hack, rather a bug for sure.
Also the user Giratina has not posted anything from Aug 15, 2018, which points that it is nothing intentional or something like a hack, rather a bug for sure.
sr. member
Activity: 375
Merit: 1021
Just in case no one loves you, I love you 3000.
Buying and selling merit not from sources is allowed by the forum, somehow...
AFAIK, buying and selling are disallowed.Can I sell merit?
Selling merit is disallowed.
Selling merit is disallowed.
@leo, As a question, can your parser parse negative merit? I don't know it would be able too anyway it'll be interesting to see if anyone knows anything about this.
. I can't think it's an old bug, maybe Theymos has given out demerits or made a few sources to even out the field...
I don't think we having demerit options,because I can see only merit button.Even if it is given for selective people we may already had announcement on META so it must be a bug need to sorted out soon.. I can't think it's an old bug, maybe Theymos has given out demerits or made a few sources to even out the field...
Not everything is announced to meta though... An alt board mod could be a demerit and hopefully will if it does/has come out.
Merit isn't moderated unless it's from sources.
Buying and selling merit not from sources is allowed by the forum, somehow...
Such case is based on Report to Admin function.
Sample of PM sent by user Giratina and got reported to admin.
When admins found out that it is a valid case, they will undo any merit given to a certain user. There are many reporting functions here in our forum and I manage to experienced using them.
He was buying merits and you reported him... Right?Sample of PM sent by user Giratina and got reported to admin.
hi can i ask help
i will pay if you help me
i will pay if you help me
When admins found out that it is a valid case, they will undo any merit given to a certain user. There are many reporting functions here in our forum and I manage to experienced using them.
So that got him demerited?
very interesting. somehow I see this bug as a solution for the spammer or plagiarism.
Jump to: