"these morons" ... you mean yourself right? Isn't it ironic that the first guy to throw out a personal insult... is completely wrong and is the real moron. So stupid, you don't even know that you are stupid. And aggressively stupid at that.
Don't take it personally; my insult was directed at you morons in general, not you specifically. I'm sorry if I offended you more than the other morons. Anyone who thinks the law or even basic ethics somehow don't apply to Bitcoin is either stupid or severely delusional. If you want to break the law, that's your business, but at least don't act all surprised when people get angry about it.
"We live in a society of law." - actually we don't, it's called bitcoin, and it is illegal (US courts have interpreted the law as giving the US government a monopoly on currency, see how this ended for Liberty Dollar and e-gold; with other countries being similar), and unpoliceable.
What the Hell are you smoking? Bitcoin is
not illegal. Liberty Dollars were busted for counterfeiting (they were trying to pass off their coins as real U.S. dollars), and e-gold is still operating, despite the operators being busted for running an unlicensed money transmitting business. The U.S. government specifically allowed e-gold to continue functioning since it recognises that e-gold's users still have a legal right to the money in their accounts, regardless of what laws the company broke. Bitcoin is not a money transmitting business and is not being passed off as real U.S. dollars, so neither of these cases apply to it. There is also no law giving the U.S. government a monopoly on currency; while the law requires U.S. currency to be accepted as payment for debts, any other currency may be used for any other kind of private transaction if both parties agree. It's perfectly legal to pay Canadian dollars, Euros, or bitcoins to anyone who's willing to accept them as payment. Bitcoin is
not unpoliceable either. I'm not sure why you would think it is.
If it ever magically became policeable and policed, then wait for them to at least threaten you before giving the money back, otherwise they are SOL. It is also unlikely that we even live in the same society - what if the accidental recipient is in some lawless part of the world and the accidental sender is in another part that has no applicable treaty with the recipient's country - sender is SOL again.
There are no laws if there is no one to enforce them.
"society of law"... lol.
When you go shopping, do you just grab all the goods you want and then walk out without paying? At least wait until they threaten you before giving them the money. It's their own damn fault if they don't notice you leaving without paying, right? Right?
You're going to end up either dead or in jail if you try to apply those principles to the real world.
There are always people willing to enforce the law. The question is whether those people are police, who generally won't mess you up too much if you go along quietly, or mobsters who'll beat the shit out of you if you don't pay back what you owe. Which of these societies do you live in?