I skimmed a few posts and from the looks of it, they are doing what they should do in this section. I see no doubles or other things that violate the rules:
FTFY. As for violating , well
1) They are making low quality posts
Its a link collection sub board, what exactly do you expect? While a personal view on the article would be nice I dont think its needed.
2) They have a paid signature
I doubt their sig management wants them advertising in a section that is hardly seen, contacting them might get the section excluded.
3) They are posting copied content(can't find that quote from hilarious, from the thread where you report people who copy others' post)
Its properly quoted with a source though. They dont claim to have written even a single word of the post. IMHO thats a big difference.
4) They are doing so massively, a few might be tolerable
Well, yes. I can hardly say anything against that. I also agree that they probably do it for the sig payment, but on the plus side they create a neatly sorted archive of press articles. Exactly what the section was intended for, even though the "news sites" they quote might not be up to everyones standard. I think contacting the campaign manager(s) is the better idea. They will stop if they do it for the satoshi and it removes the need for staff to get involed when its not needed.
And lastly, similar case which was reported by(now my alt)
TheLegendaryOne and they were banned.
I cant read that so I cant say what is what.