Pages:
Author

Topic: Business Model of new company 21 Inc predicted by Satoshi? (Read 2044 times)

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 501
There already are solutions that don't rely on centrally trusted nodes for instant confirmations besides sidechains:

http://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper-DRAFT-0.5.pdf
http://lightning.network/lightning-network.pdf
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lightning-network-another-proposal-to-make-bitcoin-scale-970822

There is no reason both cannot exist as well.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Honest 80s business!
I think Satoshi just got a lot of the basic ideas and implications right, even at the beginning and the following 2 years or so - I mean he invented it. The companies that come along now are merely obvious incarnations of various ideas.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
LOLOLOL. Trust me, you have no clue about Satoshi or his motives. So please don't make stuff up about him. You're using his creation, that would automatically make you a fool if you're calling him a fool. That's just circular logic.

Circular logic? There is only circular fallacy in your post.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Just to double check / confirm:
Yes, Satoshi seems to think fast confirmation can be done WITHOUT changing the core Bitcoin protocol.
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

Relying on Satoshi's opinion would be a mistake. He already has a track record of making big ones (unsustainability of mining without subsidies, selfish mining, centralization of mining). It's better to use your own brain if you know how, of course.


LOLOLOL. Trust me, you have no clue about Satoshi or his motives. So please don't make stuff up about him. You're using his creation, that would automatically make you a fool if you're calling him a fool. That's just circular logic.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU
Business Model of new company 21 Inc predicted by Satoshi?

Plausible speculation:
New company 21 Inc to offer realtime payment confirmations for bitcoin:
"More likely, in my opinion, is that they want to become/create ‘trusted nodes’ within the Bitcoin mining network permitting merchants & machines near-instant confidence that their transactions will be 100% confirmed. "
Source: http://alistairmilne.com/2015/03/14/what-is-21-inc-developing/

Satoshi:
"I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less."
Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

"Trust" equals to "failure" in Bitcoin world. If Satoshi seriously considered adding trust to Bitcoin then something wrong with this guy.

Not as long as it's optional whether you want to use 'pure' Bitcoin or 3rd party processing service.
This is correct. The core nugget of bitcoin remains, anything you build on top of that core does not compromise the blockchain.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
Business Model of new company 21 Inc predicted by Satoshi?

Plausible speculation:
New company 21 Inc to offer realtime payment confirmations for bitcoin:
"More likely, in my opinion, is that they want to become/create ‘trusted nodes’ within the Bitcoin mining network permitting merchants & machines near-instant confidence that their transactions will be 100% confirmed. "
Source: http://alistairmilne.com/2015/03/14/what-is-21-inc-developing/

Satoshi:
"I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less."
Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

This is the most interesting Satoshi thread in two years. It does appear that he supports the trusted node concept as presented by the 21 group. Centralization wouldn't be necessary if the company simply intends to act as an insurance company against theft guaranteeing to pay their connected merchants for zero confirm transactions. They would need to comply with worldwide updates or risk being caught on the wrong side of a fork. They could also decide to fork Bitcoin into a private network, if necessary, at any point in time. Neither of these options would centralize the network. As for providing near-instant (0 confirmation) transactions that are guaranteed to be valid. I'm not sure that's possible as a trusted node component of the current larger network. It would be useful for avoiding cancer nodes or a Sybil attack but not classic double spend attacks.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
If you and the company selling you the goods both have coinbase account, your transaction is also real time. Is it the same as 21?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Do you mean instant confirmation? I think you have never heard about greenAddress, it is a web wallet with an instant confirmation (the only rule is that also the other part uses it). Now it can be used for any payment processor.
I used to use green address until after an update it stopped working altogether, another update later and it's back working but slow as to open, it's empty now so i won't be using it again.

Has someone got a quick explanation of how instant transactions work.

An instant transaction wouldn't really be "instant" it was just be "instantly trusted" by those in the network. It could work like this:

A multibillion dollar company establish good rapport in the community and acts as a middle man. Each of us has a "bank account" with them in which we keep some fraction of our bitcoin. This huge/trusted company has 1 well known public address. We walk into a store and use our app that is run by this company, we scan the stores QR code and the bitcoin is sent to the store from that well known public address on our behalf, then the well known company deducts that amount of bitcoin from our "bank account" with them.

The store then sees that the payment came from a well known/regulated/large company and that they "are good for it" meaning that they will not try to create any double spends, thus the transaction is still on the bitcoin blockchain and the transaction is "instantly trusted" by the store, allowing the store to then give the customer the goods with confidence that there will be no double spend and thus no need to wait for confirmations.

a way to do it without trusted parties is just query other nodes in real time for any attempted double spends.  (see BIP 35) 
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Yes, I thought this issue before, about the confirmation, waiting for a confirmation in a real purchasing is very troublesome and time wasting, you can't ask people to wait for a confirmation after they sent the money, this is would stop Bitcoin from becoming a real currency. Satoshi predicted this issue and he always predicted the issues, now company like 21 inc will work this out.

At the moment bitcoin is a good and alternative way for send large quantity of "money" without the use of a centralized intermediate (like a bank) and especially with the lowest fees in the world. It will be a real "currency" when the actual economy system will completely broke, because bitcoin is not compatible with the FIAT economy.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Yes, I thought this issue before, about the confirmation, waiting for a confirmation in a real purchasing is very troublesome and time wasting, you can't ask people to wait for a confirmation after they sent the money, this is would stop Bitcoin from becoming a real currency. Satoshi predicted this issue and he always predicted the issues, now company like 21 inc will work this out.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Business Model of new company 21 Inc predicted by Satoshi?

Plausible speculation:
New company 21 Inc to offer realtime payment confirmations for bitcoin:
"More likely, in my opinion, is that they want to become/create ‘trusted nodes’ within the Bitcoin mining network permitting merchants & machines near-instant confidence that their transactions will be 100% confirmed. "
Source: http://alistairmilne.com/2015/03/14/what-is-21-inc-developing/

Satoshi:
"I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less."
Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

"Trust" equals to "failure" in Bitcoin world. If Satoshi seriously considered adding trust to Bitcoin then something wrong with this guy.

Not as long as it's optional whether you want to use 'pure' Bitcoin or 3rd party processing service.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Just to double check / confirm:
Yes, Satoshi seems to think fast confirmation can be done WITHOUT changing the core Bitcoin protocol.
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

Relying on Satoshi's opinion would be a mistake. He already has a track record of making big ones (unsustainability of mining without subsidies, selfish mining, centralization of mining). It's better to use your own brain if you know how, of course.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
Generally speaking trusted nodes are good stuff, but implementing such nodes would somewhat compromise the decentralization, and that would be the re-implementation of a trust based payment system. Probably this isn't a big price for wider merchant adoption, especially because of the wast majority of the nodes would remain truly decentralized.
full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 101
It is impossible (at the moment) to make a change in the protocol , if you add a fast confirmation you "ruin" the decentralization of bitcoin itself.  I think the unique way is to add a largne number of nodes (but maybe I am wrong). For the large adoption as you said this is a "good" compromise between the use of bitcoin and a sort of partial decentralization.

Just to double check / confirm:
Yes, Satoshi seems to think fast confirmation can be done WITHOUT changing the core Bitcoin protocol.
See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819
full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 101
I think your idea about a trusted node sounds more plausible that the bitcoin mining job that I heard being thrown around. I think there are several ways, they could profit from there. Offer a fast confirmation more like a service for large transactions or maybe become helps towards the retail service adoption. There are many possibilities.

Alistair Milne talks about combining the both Wink
"If this is the case, 21 Inc may be happy to mine at break even, profiting from adoption instead."
http://alistairmilne.com/2015/03/14/what-is-21-inc-developing/
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Well, it should have been addressed somewhere.... We cannot walk into a Coffee shop.. buy a cup of coffee and wait 5 minutes for the first confirmation to happen, before you can leave the shop.

Having one central organization doing this, was not the solution I was waiting for.... I would have hoped some change in the protocol would have made this possible.

The secrecy is not a good thing.... but Satoshi followed that route, so their must be a valid reason for that. {Patent} ?

It is impossible (at the moment) to make a change in the protocol , if you add a fast confirmation you "ruin" the decentralization of bitcoin itself.  I think the unique way is to add a largne number of nodes (but maybe I am wrong). For the large adoption as you said this is a "good" compromise between the use of bitcoin and a sort of partial decentralization.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
Well, it should have been addressed somewhere.... We cannot walk into a Coffee shop.. buy a cup of coffee and wait 5 minutes for the first confirmation to happen, before you can leave the shop.

Having one central organization doing this, was not the solution I was waiting for.... I would have hoped some change in the protocol would have made this possible.

Edit : The secrecy is not a good thing.... but Satoshi followed that route of thought, {trusted nodes} so their must be a valid reason for that. {Patent} ?
Q7
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I think your idea about a trusted node sounds more plausible that the bitcoin mining job that I heard being thrown around. I think there are several ways, they could profit from there. Offer a fast confirmation more like a service for large transactions or maybe become helps towards the retail service adoption. There are many possibilities.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Business Model of new company 21 Inc predicted by Satoshi?

Plausible speculation:
New company 21 Inc to offer realtime payment confirmations for bitcoin:
"More likely, in my opinion, is that they want to become/create ‘trusted nodes’ within the Bitcoin mining network permitting merchants & machines near-instant confidence that their transactions will be 100% confirmed. "
Source: http://alistairmilne.com/2015/03/14/what-is-21-inc-developing/

Satoshi:
"I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less."
Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3819

"Trust" equals to "failure" in Bitcoin world. If Satoshi seriously considered adding trust to Bitcoin then something wrong with this guy.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Do you mean instant confirmation? I think you have never heard about greenAddress, it is a web wallet with an instant confirmation (the only rule is that also the other part uses it). Now it can be used for any payment processor.
I used to use green address until after an update it stopped working altogether, another update later and it's back working but slow as to open, it's empty now so i won't be using it again.

Has someone got a quick explanation of how instant transactions work.

An instant transaction wouldn't really be "instant" it was just be "instantly trusted" by those in the network. It could work like this:

A multibillion dollar company establish good rapport in the community and acts as a middle man. Each of us has a "bank account" with them in which we keep some fraction of our bitcoin. This huge/trusted company has 1 well known public address. We walk into a store and use our app that is run by this company, we scan the stores QR code and the bitcoin is sent to the store from that well known public address on our behalf, then the well known company deducts that amount of bitcoin from our "bank account" with them.

The store then sees that the payment came from a well known/regulated/large company and that they "are good for it" meaning that they will not try to create any double spends, thus the transaction is still on the bitcoin blockchain and the transaction is "instantly trusted" by the store, allowing the store to then give the customer the goods with confidence that there will be no double spend and thus no need to wait for confirmations.

It is the same thing , also greenAddress use an internal instant confirm. but with GA you have a multiSog address, every transaction the change will sent to another address, if they close you will note lose your bitcoin (due the nLockTime). An instant and real confirmation (as you said) will never exist in all the bitcoin blockchain because it disagree with the "basic" rule of decentralization.
Pages:
Jump to: