Segwit readiness, making transaction fees lower when depositing and withdrawing from your site might be a good marketing tool. Plus it also encourages others to use Segwit. You not only help yourself, but also the whole Bitcoin community as well.
We process withdrawals at cost, so the fee we charge is dynamic just like transaction fees are. Right now, for example, the fee for an instant withdrawal is 717.24 bits and 141.78 bits for a batched withdrawal. To account for the marginal cost of consolidating an additional deposit, a fee is also charged for each deposit (currently 59.80 bits).
Because spending from a SegWit address takes up less block space than spending from a legacy address, a lower fee is required. We pass those savings on to the user, so SegWit does indeed lower the cost of withdrawing from bustadice.
Spending to a SegWit address is not cheaper than sending to a legacy address, though, so SegWit doesn't actually lower the cost of depositing.
May I ask how much lower the fees are when users withdraw using Bustadice's Segwit enabled address compared to a legacy address, if you have used it in the past.
Because from the feedback I had from Yolodice, they were saying that the "savings" they are having by using Segwit is only 30% and ethan_nx expressed this as "close to nothing".
Would you say the reduction in fees from using Segwit is close to nothing?
I am not saying ethan_nx is wrong or biased towards other solutions like accepting Bitcoin Cash, but I want to know each casino's experience.