Topic: Buy Telegram members | Very High Quality bots at low prices! (Read 871 times)
The page "Recent Tasks" was added in panel.
Added some new features.
That's actual!
Added new profiles.
That's actual!
Now we'll giving bonuses for new users! For more information just contact me.
We had updated the service!
* Added automatic manage panel
* Added a lot of cryptocurrency users
You can register in panel and easily manage ur tasks.
* Added automatic manage panel
* Added a lot of cryptocurrency users
You can register in panel and easily manage ur tasks.
September 27, 2020, 04:43:58 PM
Great Job! If you want to buy Telegram bots with cheap price or buy Telegram members try www.addtelegrammember.com website. i hope that will help you guys.
thats actual!
high quality bots !
high quality bots !
What do you mean by saying 'high quality'? You mean they won't be banned?
low ban chance and high realism
What do you mean by saying 'high quality'? You mean they won't be banned?
It's actual!
How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?
People that do bounty for a living aren't foold and can simply check all those info How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?
In that case, the bounty manager should investigate the telegram activity. I guess the bots of the telegram group are detectable.
If you do everything correctly and use the methods in a complex, then you will never know that there are bots in the group.
Definitely not. All I need to do is having a look at the members in that group, that's possible publicly in groups / supergroups and I can scroll a little bit back to see the members. If there is a significant number of bot accounts it's easily to detect them for experienced shitcoin analysts. If someone is not that dumb they won't be fooled.
Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.
Why do you think that? If they receive their reward as promised there is not a single reason why invited people should be worse than fake bots. And in addition maybe some of these members are going to invest if it's not a scam shitcoin project. As a shitcoin artist (
) I woudn't think a second about inviting bots because it's not just useless, it's harmful for a project. Same as bumping services. If I see such shady marketing, my first impression is GTFO. 
If you do everything correctly and use the methods in a complex, then you will never know that there are bots in the group.
Definitely not. All I need to do is having a look at the members in that group, that's possible publicly in groups / supergroups and I can scroll a little bit back to see the members. If there is a significant number of bot accounts it's easily to detect them for experienced shitcoin analysts. If someone is not that dumb they won't be fooled.
Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.
Why do you think that? If they receive their reward as promised there is not a single reason why invited people should be worse than fake bots. And in addition maybe some of these members are going to invest if it's not a scam shitcoin project. As a shitcoin artist () I woudn't think a second about inviting bots because it's not just useless, it's harmful for a project. Same as bumping services. If I see such shady marketing, my first impression is GTFO. How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?
Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign.
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.
Better allocate a little part in the bounty to give people a reward when they join. And kick all bot/inactive accounts when it comes to final checking one or two weeks after the bounty is over. Disadvantage: the rewards are tiny for each participant and it can happen that there are so many transactions to be done, the transaction costs are far too high for the little amount of tokens for each participant.
To solve this problem of too much transaction costs a better solution is to create the Telegram bounty as invitation bounty where participants can invite their friends to the Telegram group. That would solve the problem that you don't have to send tiny amounts of tokens to thousands of users because the participants who are inviting their friends will get the reward. If each user invites 10 friends on average you'll save 9x transaction costs.
Like in every campaign it's also importand to weed out cheaters like if they are not inviting their friends but instead random people from other chats without their permission or if they add bots:
- When the final checking will be done (around one week after the bounty) to check if all participants are still in the group, kick everyone who has a last active time more than one week ago. (The invited friends have to enable last active time in the Telegram settings and that needs to be mentioned in the rules that they need to enable it. Users where the last active time is not enabled will count as not eligible).
- Kick every participant where more than 50% of his invited friends left the group or if they are not eligible (no last active time enabled or last active time more than 1 week ago) when you check final stakes.
That would save huge transaction costs and be a legit way to increase number of members in a Telegram group.
Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.
How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?
Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign.
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.
Better allocate a little part in the bounty to give people a reward when they join. And kick all bot/inactive accounts when it comes to final checking one or two weeks after the bounty is over. Disadvantage: the rewards are tiny for each participant and it can happen that there are so many transactions to be done, the transaction costs are far too high for the little amount of tokens for each participant.
To solve this problem of too much transaction costs a better solution is to create the Telegram bounty as invitation bounty where participants can invite their friends to the Telegram group. That would solve the problem that you don't have to send tiny amounts of tokens to thousands of users because the participants who are inviting their friends will get the reward. If each user invites 10 friends on average you'll save 9x transaction costs.
Like in every campaign it's also importand to weed out cheaters like if they are not inviting their friends but instead random people from other chats without their permission or if they add bots:
- When the final checking will be done (around one week after the bounty) to check if all participants are still in the group, kick everyone who has a last active time more than one week ago. (The invited friends have to enable last active time in the Telegram settings and that needs to be mentioned in the rules that they need to enable it. Users where the last active time is not enabled will count as not eligible).
- Kick every participant where more than 50% of his invited friends left the group or if they are not eligible (no last active time enabled or last active time more than 1 week ago) when you check final stakes.
That would save huge transaction costs and be a legit way to increase number of members in a Telegram group.
How You collect those membres, source.
I believe that You member will be real, but i need to know source.
These are bots, like living, real people.I believe that You member will be real, but i need to know source.
We make them ourselves.
How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?
Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign.
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.
Jump to: